A water park with swim gear is totally the same situation. It's not like swim suits are functional clothing right? Costumes are totally required at a con!
Right, but it's not the only kind of swimwear available.
A water park with swim gear is totally the same situation. It's not like swim suits are functional clothing right? Costumes are totally required at a con!
This is a universal rule, even in a strip club. Well, its a sliding scale in strip clubs.Your dress code idea won't work. The restriction should be NO FUCKING TOUCHING!
Yeah SDCC is massive, but having cons work together to get a list of people known to have been caught sexually harassing people at SDCC and other cons and ban them from buying tickets to said events might help a bit.I think catching the people in the complaints is gonna be a tad harder than people are taking into account. SDCC is huge.
You can like certain outfits and still want more diversity in the visual design and characterization of female characters.No one deserves to be harassed or touched without permission regardless of gender. And just because someone is dressed in something sexy or almost nude doesn't give you the right to touch or harass.
As a side note, I wonder why females who feel comics and games objectify women , then will come out and dress in costumes that they find objectifying. This doesn't mean people have the right to harass them. I'm just bringing it up as a side thing. I just find female representation in these kind of things weird. Like how often they fall into the role of male power fantasy and yet how popular they seem to be with female cosplayers.
If that last part of my post is ignorant, I apologize. It's just something I've always wondered about.
So I should be able to go to a water park and take tons of photos of ladies without asking because they are in public and clearly want sexualized attention?
How about if you touch you get banned from the con and other cons could work together to put banns on sales of badges to said people? Put a consequence to sexual harassment at cons and don't punish people for wanting to cosplay.
Yeah SDCC is massive, but having cons work together to get a list of people known to have been caught sexually harassing people at SDCC and other cons and ban them from buying tickets to said events might help a bit.
You can like certain outfits and still want more diversity in the visual design and characterization of female characters.
So I should be able to go to a water park and take tons of photos of ladies without asking because they are in public and clearly want sexualized attention?
A water park with swim gear is totally the same situation. It's not like swim suits are functional clothing right? Costumes are totally required at a con!
That's assault, but I'm with you. I can't count on fingers and toes how many times I've had to stop myself from smashing some punk's face in after they yelled some lewd comment at them from across the street.
This girl complained about people staring at her, and taking photos. I'm sorry, but if I left the house 90% naked people would stare at me as well. There's no law against looking or taking photos and it's to be expected when you leave the house 90% uncovered. Obviously touching is bang out of order.
This girl complained about people staring at her, and taking photos. I'm sorry, but if I left the house 90% naked people would stare at me as well. There's no law against looking or taking photos and it's to be expected when you leave the house 90% uncovered. Obviously touching is bang out of order.
Not if its self defense from somebody touching you.
As for lewd comments, that will always boil down to a "he said, she said" argument and would be nearly impossible to enforce.
For what it's worth, my wife went to Origins (a board game convention) 3 years ago wearing Jeans and a T-Shirt and was harassed really badly.
To the point that she left our booth and stayed in the hotel most of the time.
Maybe a "ask before taking a photo" guideline would be helpful on top of hard rules regarding inappropriate pictures.
For what it's worth, my wife went to Origins (a board game convention) 3 years ago wearing Jeans and a T-Shirt and was harassed really badly.
To the point that she left our booth and stayed in the hotel most of the time.
Also,
It's really not too much to stop and ask someone if you can take a photo of them.
If you are taking a photo and they are incidental to a shot, whatever. Like a crowd shot or a shot of a booth.
But if you are specifically taking a photo of someone it really isn't too much to say "hey, mind if I take a photo".
It's really not the end of the world.
You know what kind of creepy attention she's actually talking about. Don't be disingenuous.This girl complained about people staring at her, and taking photos. I'm sorry, but if I left the house 90% naked people would stare at me as well. There's no law against looking or taking photos and it's to be expected when you leave the house 90% uncovered. Obviously touching is bang out of order.
No one deserves to be harassed or touched without permission regardless of gender. And just because someone is dressed in something sexy or almost nude doesn't give you the right to touch or harass.
As a side note, I wonder why females who feel comics and games objectify women , then will come out and dress in costumes that they find objectifying. This doesn't mean people have the right to harass them. I'm just bringing it up as a side thing. I just find female representation in these kind of things weird. Like how often they fall into the role of male power fantasy and yet how popular they seem to be with female cosplayers.
If that last part of my post is ignorant, I apologize. It's just something I've always wondered about.
The thing is, that's already a guideline that a lot of people understand about cosplayers. That doesn't prevent the problems they're having. I find the photo ban stuff to be unenforceable anyway but that guideline won't change anything.
Lord knows SDCC can afford to hire more security. Truth is this should be a standard at conventions regardless of the purpose behind the con
Men have specific power fantasies. There doesn't need to be a gender equivalent for that to be true.Yuck, I hate that term "male power fantasy" because it get's so overused and underexplained. I mean a big muscular guy in a loin cloth with a broad sward = male power fantasy. A big muscular guy in a loin cloth dipping a woman about to kiss her in a romance novel cover = ?
It just seems like somehow with that term only male's have power fantasies, I have yet to hear about what a "woman's power fantasy" would be.
You know what kind of creepy attention she's actually talking about. Don't be disingenuous.
It's hard out there. Harder than it should be.
Like what? Any picture of her is gonna seem like a creeper shot because she's practically nude. I don't see how giving her any sort of attention couldn't in some way be construed as weird/creepy.
If it's codified it can be reported and enforced. Employees or security or enforcers in the case of PAX can issue warnings or remove people if they break a rule and people reporting the issue can get it handled. Writing it down makes a difference. And issuing an official guideline regarding asking people is just an awareness thing.
It's not more security, it's better trained security. I'm not sure if this is the case at SDCC, but at most cons, they can't pull someone's badge with out taking the offender to con-ops and going through their own methods of dual process.
Yes, evidently wearing a button on her shirt was open season for people to lean in real close to 'read the button'.
That is a whole other complication to this mess.
At PAX, the enforcers are fanboys who aren't being paid. I've observed some to be absolutely fucked. These conventions need a larger police or professional security presence.
Just out of curiosity, to you have the quote?
Also,
It's really not too much to stop and ask someone if you can take a photo of them.
If you are taking a photo and they are incidental to a shot, whatever. Like a crowd shot or a shot of a booth.
But if you are specifically taking a photo of someone it really isn't too much to say "hey, mind if I take a photo".
It's really not the end of the world.
It took me awhile to want to go back to cons because of what happened to me but I have 2 friends that will never go back due to this one group of guys who kept on slapping their asses and getting on the floor to look up their skirts and then run away. All they were trying to do was pass out candy to kids at the con but were met with harassment INFRONT OF THE KIDS and they even started stalking them the entire con and two of them put a pack of condoms in their candy basket with their room number on it and staff wouldn't do shit!
Shit gets pretty fucking bad at cons and it really can be emotionally damaging.
I thought people did this. Every con I went to I personally asked people for pictures and I seen others do the same. Weird
You've got to be shitting me
Random people leaned in and came into her personal space to read the button she was wearing?
Wow!
I mean what happened to the "Hey what's your button say?"
This girl complained about people staring at her, and taking photos. I'm sorry, but if I left the house 90% naked people would stare at me as well. There's no law against looking or taking photos and it's to be expected when you leave the house 90% uncovered. Obviously touching is bang out of order.
if you're in public you shouldn't complain about your picture being taken.
I'm speaking generally here so forgive me...
but its pretty ridiculous how actual strippers get better treatment than women who dress down at conventions.
I'm speaking generally here so forgive me...
but its pretty ridiculous how actual strippers get better treatment than women who dress down at conventions.
She deleted the message.
She deleted the message.
Oh, it was a logo on a 4.5" button. There is zero question that the button could be read from about 15 feet away.
Why do you feel adult men can't be good human beings? I could be put in a room with her and have no problem with respecting her as a human being. Why put it on her to change for shitheads?I don't see how she can sit there and say she's pissed about stares when she's walking around a predominatly male Con pretty much naked.
Yeah it sucks, but that particular costume is gonna get stares that I think you would know about ahead of time.