• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Sunset Overdrive Review Thread

Yeah there is an undercurrent to most of the reviews about how easy the game is and repetitive the mission structure is. 2 things that would otherwise kill most other games score wise, or atleast push it into the low 80's type of score. Infamous for example got hammered for repetitive missions even though it also had incredibly imaginative and fun traversal and cool attacks from powers and whatnot. So as always, there is no consistency from one review to the next even if you could have 2 games with identical problems getting completely different review vibes lol, but that is par for the course these days. Destiny was one of those " very fun to play but too repetitive " type reviews which pushed it to a 78-83. SO sounds like it is " very fun but too repetitive " and it stays in the 85-92 range.

I guess if you are going to go repetitive, then just keep it at third person and keep it more to Dead Rising style gameplay.

I'll head over to a friends house this week and check it out. If anything it sounds like classic Insomniac so it will be fun.

uh this is at 83 off 44 reviews on Metacritic. Don't really understand what you're saying here.
 

Jobbs

Banned
Based on some GAFfers' hair trigger shit talking about this game, there's not nearly enough crow eating in this thread.

So you're talking in generalities, and then your vindication to the generalities are highly subjective review scores? I haven't even noticed the shit talking you're referring to.

For me, the reviews and more information/more footage led me to cancel my preorder. I don't really care about numbers.

Why even bring that into this thread?
 

d1rtn4p

Member
The Gamespot review mentions that it can be compared to Crackdown, which could be my favorite game from last gen. Does anyone know how it compares to it?
 
So you're talking in generalities, and then your vindication to the generalities are highly subjective review scores? For me, the reviews and more information/more footage led me to cancel my preorder. I don't really care about numbers.

Why even bring that into this thread?
Last night, a ton of GAFfers we're guessing the metacritic score specifically. One person said 65-70 without any sort of justification. Lots of other folks guessed around the mid-70s. The game is obviously much better than what many have guessed. This thread is about reviews. Why not call out people for their unrationalized opinions?

Also what matters to you doesn't necessarily matter to everyone else and vice versa.
 
Yeah there is an undercurrent to most of the reviews about how easy the game is and repetitive the mission structure is. 2 things that would otherwise kill most other games score wise, or atleast push it into the low 80's type of score. Infamous for example got hammered for repetitive missions even though it also had incredibly imaginative and fun traversal and cool attacks from powers and whatnot. So as always, there is no consistency from one review to the next even if you could have 2 games with identical problems getting completely different review vibes lol, but that is par for the course these days. Destiny was one of those " very fun to play but too repetitive " type reviews which pushed it to a 78-83. SO sounds like it is " very fun but too repetitive " and it stays in the 85-92 range.

I guess if you are going to go repetitive, then just keep it at third person and keep it more to Dead Rising style gameplay.

I'll head over to a friends house this week and check it out. If anything it sounds like classic Insomniac so it will be fun.

I think there is a difference between repetitive mission structures and literally forcing a player to repeat missions multiple times.
 

Lego Boss

Member
For everyone saying they're shocked it reviewed so well, honest question, you expected worse than an 83 meta?

83 is a really good score when taken across the spectrum. When at University (in the UK) if you wrote an 83% paper the lecturers would be gushing over how it had the 'potential for publication'.

I know the metric is not quite the same in gaming, but I think 83 for a new IP on everyone's least favourite console (I own XO by the way) is pretty good going.

Still reckon Edge will give it a 7 though.
 

BumRush

Member
Honest question, is this your first Sunset Overdrive thread on GAF?

Haha no not at all. I just don't know what people expected. I don't have an x1 and I think it's a good looking game by a great developer that looks fun as hell. I'd have guessed 85 average...Def not sub 83
 
For everyone saying they're shocked it reviewed so well, honest question, you expected worse than an 83 meta?

I'd go for "prepared for worse" than "expected worse".

It's a brand new IP, with a years worth of hype behind it. In most circumstances that ends up in disappointment so I'm sure many people were being realistic in that not being successful was a possibility.
 

Catdaddy

Member
Good job Insomnia, so now I need one more XB1 exclusive that appeals to me before I make the plunge, although the Xmas price drop is tempting.
 

ironcreed

Banned
This game really looks like the very definition of an open world sandbox. It also seems like it is going to have an incredible sense of progression with all of the amazing abilities and weapons that you will get access to.
 
GT also rated Forza Horizon 2 nearly the same as Driveclub. I wouldn't necessarily trust their reviews. To each their own though.

Also, Ben Moore rated Bayonetta 2 10/10. I would trust their reviews.

Anyway, this holyday season I'm picking both consoles (including SO) since I'm expecting Sony to answer microsoft's move by lowering their prices too.
 

Kandinsky

Member
That's how I feel about the humour from what I have seen of the game. Computer games in general haven't ever really managed to hit the comedy mark well, the games that get the closest for me would be Rockstar games.

I'm sure this game will be fun to play though.

Paper Mario is great, play it.
 

Jobbs

Banned
Last night, a ton of GAFfers we're guessing the metacritic score specifically. One person said 65-70 without any sort of justification. Lots of other folks guessed around the mid-70s. The game is obviously much better than what many have guessed. This thread is about reviews. Why not call out people for their unrationalized opinions?

Also what matters to you doesn't necessarily matter to everyone else and vice versa.

so because "lots of people" guessed mid 70s meta, and it's low 80s meta, it's time to shove their face in it? that's what this thread is for? nailing people who were 8 points off in their meta prediction?
 

Sydle

Member
Haha no not at all. I just don't know what people expected. I don't have an x1 and I think it's a good looking game by a great developer that looks fun as hell. I'd have guessed 85 average...Def not sub 83

A lot of people said it was bound to get mostly 6's and 7's.
 
so because "lots of people" guessed mid 70s meta, and it's low 80s meta, it's time to shove their face in it? that's what this thread is for? nailing people who were 8 points off in their meta prediction?
I'm just saying that there was a ton of undeserved vitriol towards the game before release (for whatever reason). This is a fact - go read any past SO thread. In many cases, the people who have talked shit about the game in the past haven't honed up to their mistakes. I don't see what is wrong with this statement.
 

Jobbs

Banned
They've moved on to the $349 holiday bundle thread. Like roaches I tell ya.

we've already established that "hair trigger shit talking" means predicting a mid 70s meta, oh, and one guy who predicted 65-70. I think we should beat the shit out of those guys!

I'm just saying that there was a ton of undeserved vitriol towards the game before release (for whatever reason). This is a fact - go read any past SO thread. In many cases, the people who have talked shit about the game in the past haven't honed up to their mistakes. I don't see what is wrong with this statement.

If we're even going to assume your proof of "go to ANY SO thread! everyone's shit talking" claim is true, I don't think metacritic being 83 instead of 75 is "vindication". personally, I never really listen to review numbers because I know how pointless they are.
 

kaching

"GAF's biggest wanker"
Decent scores overall, but its a shame that Insomniac just can't ever seem to break through that 90 ceiling on their games. They really deserve to do better with the majority of their catalog.
 

Ape

Banned
They've moved on to the $349 holiday bundle thread. Like roaches I tell ya.

speaking of that, if i buy the so bundle at target on tuesday do you know if they will refund the difference when the price drops since its five days after?
 
I'm literally teetering on the edge. I really don't want to get it from the US store, but I'm not sure I can last the three days until Friday either.

Gotta love your enthusiasm Miles, it reminds me of my TEW excitement. I hope you get it ASAP! Game looks fantastic. Great to see the review scores being so good.
 

Jobbs

Banned
Holy shit dude, relax. It was a throwaway comment.

you're the one who brought the fanboy war stuff into the thread. I'm just pushing back against it. I am the least console warrior person you're likely to find. I couldn't care less if an exclusive for either side gets a high score or a low score.

don't drop a stinkbomb into a clean thread and then tell other people to relax.
 

muzzymate

Member
Was very on the fence about this game. Glad it's getting such good reviews. Will definitely pick up now when I get enough Bing Rewards credits.
 

alterno69

Banned
Great scores, i'm happy last gens 9 are current gens 8.

Not my type of game tho, had fun infamous but got bored midway. Open world games are not really for me, only one i've managed to beat is GTA V thanks to the characters mostly.

But great to see Insomniac deliver, coolest guys in the industry.

Now my hype for R&C is higher :D
 

Principate

Saint Titanfall
A lot of people said it was bound to get mostly 6's and 7's.

I never understood this, it always looked like a pretty fun game with some nice animations and traversal. Thinking it would get those scores leads me makes me wonder if it's because they don't own the console and thus wanted it to get those scores, maybe just my taste in games.

It always seemed to me like a bread and butter 8/10 game unless the devs really fucked up somewhere Insomniac were certainly playing to their strengths on this.
 

Servbot24

Banned
Good for Insomniac! Glad they haven't lost it. Last gen was very uninspiring from them.

Think I'll wait til this hits bargain bins simply because the combat looks too easy to manipulate, but I'm sure lots of people will get a kick out of the game.
 
Top Bottom