Snapshot King
Member
I understand people wanting 700 hours of gameplay in their $60 game, that's fine. Personally, i would rather have a tight 4-8 hour story that's engaging and good then a 20+ hour game that i want to be over 1-2 hours in. Infamous Second Son is a perfect example of a game that was 10 hours too long.
What i don't get and will never understand is this notion of "IF ITS NOT 234324 HOURS IT SHOULDN'T BE $60" bullshit, it's a AAA title. It's longer then 3 standard 90 minute movies which would cost you $60 if you bought them day of release on blu-ray.
This is the argument that drives me insane. This is not either or. This is a third person shooter, right? You ever play RE4? RE5? Dead Space 1 or 2? Uncharted 2? Last of Us? Are you saying that they're de facto worse because they have long campaigns?