I think the original LOZ would be their first open world game.
Obviously I mean "open world" in the modern sense. But I appreciate the pedantic correction.
So are Majora's Mask and Wink Waker the only 3D Zeldas that didn't get delayed? And in the case of The Wind Waker, that game is obviously rushed.
I have a feeling something like this happened:
e3 2014
Aunoma:
'look what we're doing with Zelda U! We have some great concepts, most of our giant world is mapped out! Our engine is nearly up and running, things are going well, and 14 months from now we should be good to ship!
VGAs 2014
Aunoma:
'Our engine is running and stready, the world is mapped out, and Epona won't run into trees! Check out the world! It's a bit empty, but our designers are now filling it in with side-quests, enemies, dungeons, and NPCs, and we'll show you at e3!'
February 2015
EAD staff:
'hey Aunoma, yeah, things are good, but if we want to do some of our cool concept ideas with side-quests and NPCs, we need a little more time. Also, if we want to make these ZOMG mega dungeons, yeah we need more time'
March 2015
EAD:
'Hey Monolith, great job on XCX. Now get over here and help on Zelda U filling in this giant world.'
Monolith:
'cool, why don't we add in some of these UBER giant creatures, and why isn't their a bird for link to fly around on? Woah look at this....we can do some epic shit if we add this....and this...and this'
Aunoma:
'goddamn, that is awesome - although it's not really within our scope or timeline. It's very important we launch this holiday'
Monolith:
'you think that's awesome? Well, we learned a little something on XCX, give us a minute....here....watch this-
*shows Aunoma*
Aunoma:
Aunoma:
Screw the release date. Let's make the ultimate Zelda.
Hahaha, I hope something like this DID happen
Nintendo announced this morning that its anticipated new adventure game, The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess, has been delayed. The title, formerly scheduled to debut this November around the world, has since been postponed to 2006 so that the developer can continue to make the game better.
"After much discussion, the Zelda development team has requested extra time to add new levels, more depth and even higher quality to Zelda: Twilight Princess," said Nintendo of America's vice president of corporate affairs, Perrin Kaplan. "Consequently, we're announcing a new global launch in 2006, after the conclusion of this fiscal year (March 31). We'll provide a specific date at a later point in time. While this may come as a disappointment to many eager fans, it will absolutely enrich the game and make it a multi-million seller."
Twilight Princess, developed by Nintendo and directed by Majora's Mask overseer Eiji Aonuma, was previously set to be the company's big holiday game. In fact, analysts expected the game to be Nintendo's single greatest deterrent to consumers potentially interested in Microsoft's next-generation console, Xbox 360, which is set for a November launch. The delay leaves Nintendo without a major holiday release on GameCube.
Asked whether Nintendo would launch any previously unannounced GameCube titles this holiday to stand in for Zelda, Kaplan pointed to already-shown software.
With Twilight Princess being pushed in 2006, some Nintendo fans are wondering if the game might ultimately be killed for GameCube and instead repositioned as a launch title for Revolution, the Big N's next-generation platform. Revolution is set to launch sometime in the second half of 2006, according to sources. According to Kaplan, though, the game is still scheduled to ship for GameCube.
"In effect, because of the backward compatibility built into Revolution, every GameCube game also will be a Revolution title," she said. "But we feel a commitment to the GameCube owners who've been patiently awaiting this new Zelda title, and don't want to force them to wait and buy a brand new system in order to play the game."
August 2015
http://www.ign.com/articles/2005/08/16/zelda-delayed-to-next-year
History is repeating, guys.
So are Majora's Mask and Wink Waker the only 3D Zeldas that didn't get delayed? And in the case of The Wind Waker, that game is obviously rushed.
http://www.ign.com/articles/2015/03...for-wii-u-has-been-delayed#comment-1932278145This announcement takes me back more than a decade to when I myself covered Nintendo (and my favorite franchise, The Legend of Zelda). I was wondering, have any of the Zelda console titles ever shipped "on time?"
Here's a quick history (IGN only goes back to the N64 days, so I don't recall off-hand what happened with SNES and NES):
1997: Ocarina of Time Delayed to 1998: http://www.ign.com/articles/19...
1999: Zelda Gaiden (Majora's Mask) Scheduled for 1999 (it came out in 2000): http://www.ign.com/articles/19...
2002: Wind Waker Delayed to 2003: http://www.ign.com/articles/20...
2005: Twilight Princess Delayed to 2006: http://www.ign.com/articles/20...
2010: Skyward Sword Delayed to 2011: http://www.ign.com/articles/20...
The good news is that those games all turned out mighty fine. So Let's hope that the additional months in development will result in another memorable installment. And that Nintendo has something nice to show at E3.
August 2015
http://www.ign.com/articles/2005/08/16/zelda-delayed-to-next-year
History is repeating, guys.
About ten pages back bub. ;PThis will be fine as long as they include a female Link. Right guys?
That would blow up in their faces.Hideo Kojima, Shigeru Miyamoto and Hideki Kamiya
Zelda U will be about the Four Links riding on Epona through Hyrule.About ten pages back bub. ;P
Anyways, I still can't rationalize what they must be adding for such a delay, and honestly I think the excuse is just a delay for the sake of hiding that they actually ran into development issues, so don't expect a massively different game or anything.
Nah, it'll probably be more about one Link and one Hylian princess adventuring together to save the kingdom.That would blow up in their faces.
Zelda U will be about the Four Links riding on Epona through Hyrule.
Nah, it'll probably be more about one Link and one Hylian princess adventuring together to save the kingdom.
As in Pokemon? Because I was thinking more along the lines of like 3D World or Galaxy 2 where both characters are playable at anytime.Zelda, as sheik, would be Links Rival character.
Oh Nintendo.
Only an announcement of 1080, Wave Race, F-Zero and Excite at E3 could make up for it :-/
August 2005
http://www.ign.com/articles/2005/08/16/zelda-delayed-to-next-year
History is repeating, guys.
I just hope they don't hold on to the game until Holiday 2016 if it's going to be completed long before that. Any chance of the game being a holiday system seller is going to be dead and buried with grass growing on top by that point.
If it's done by next spring, for the love of god, give it to us ASAP.
It would make sense why they might not show us anything at e3. Monolith helped finish up Skyward Sword too, although I think it was mostly art assets.
Bad examples. Both companies did a lot more than you probably think for those games.That's the other Monolithsoft, the one that doesn't make their own games anymore. They only do asset creation.
It's sort of like saying Retro developed Mario Kart 7 or that Monster Games made Tropical Freeze.
It'll be November '16. Don't get your hopes up...again.
That's the other Monolithsoft, the one that doesn't make their own games anymore. They only do asset creation.
It's sort of like saying Retro developed Mario Kart 7 or that Monster Games made Tropical Freeze.
... and there it is.August 2005
http://www.ign.com/articles/2005/08/16/zelda-delayed-to-next-year
History is repeating, guys.
... and there it is.
Get hyped for Zelda NX in November 2016!
(not all bad. Depends on what their new console looks like from a control/design perspective... and we might have a new 3D Mario to go with it...)
Not releasing a main Zelda for WiiU would be very un-Nintendo like, although I'm sure you were being sarcastic
zelda is probably cross gen. the wii u will get a zelda.Not releasing a main Zelda for WiiU would be very un-Nintendo like, although I'm sure you were being sarcastic
zelda is probably cross gen. the wii u will get a zelda.
that would be utterly irrational of them. any extra development time would benefit all versions of the game, and they would still get the game they were promised. getting pissy because it's available on another nintendo system is dumb. and buying systems for unreleased games is really super dumb.It'd still make history as the first Nintendo console not to have a Zelda all its own. With Twilight Princess, the Gamecube could still claim to have received Wind Waker exclusively.
Mind you, if cross platform does happen, I personally wouldn't mind it, and would even get it in the successor. But I do think goodwill would be lost with many fans.
Actually, SS was done by Monolith Tokyo (the Xenoblade team). The Kyoto Studio that does asset creation wasn't established until October 2011.
While Monolith Kyoto is probably already on Zelda U, but I guess it is possible that the Xenoblade X team is also helping too, given the similar scopes.
How did I miss this? Worst news of 2015 videogames. Kind of expected a delay but a no show at E3 is a horrible U turn... Nintendo is dumping the Wii U IMO.
Worst news of 2015 videogames. Kind of expected a delay but a no show at E3 is a horrible U turn...
..a horrible U turn....
U turn...
Monolith likely subcontracted a ton of companies to even make Xenoblade Chronicles X, I doubt they would have any free artists and animators to lend over this time. Also, I fully expect some type of DLC following the main release of Xenoblade X. They totally have to monetize that small consumer base.
Could even be the case that Monolith Kyoto is assisting on Animal Crossing U, while perhaps Aonuma contracts Imagica-Digitalscape for the additional texture artists and modelers (like Wind Waker HD).
It'd still make history as the first Nintendo console not to have a Zelda all its own. With Twilight Princess, the Gamecube could still claim to have received Wind Waker exclusively.
Mind you, if cross platform does happen, I personally wouldn't mind it, and would even get it in the successor. But I do think goodwill would be lost with many fans.
The strange thing about this is not the delay, it's the fact that it won't even show up at E3. Either Miyamoto upended the tea table on the direction was going or it's going to show up as an NX cross gen game next E3. I could certainly see the game getting a big overhaul
The fuck?
I'm fine with a delay in release, but no E3 showing? Then what in the hell is Nintendo gonna show?! Unless they completely surprise us out of left field with SMG3, this E3 is gonna absolutely suck ass.
August 2005
http://www.ign.com/articles/2005/08/16/zelda-delayed-to-next-year
History is repeating, guys.
For me it comes down to the quality of Starfox. I don't care for an inevitable Animal Crossing U, and I doubt they have anything else big in the pipeline. If Starfox looks nice and includes all of that co-op, ground + air gameplay with Miyamoto quality....it could be something worthy of the November slot.
Didn't Miyamoto said Starfox is episodic and a low budget game?
For me it comes down to the quality of Starfox. I don't care for an inevitable Animal Crossing U, and I doubt they have anything else big in the pipeline. If Starfox looks nice and includes all of that co-op, ground + air gameplay with Miyamoto quality....it could be something worthy of the November slot.