That's the truth. Eh.What......
It must be pretty shitty to be a dev and create such detailed environments, only for people to turn around and psis all over your efforts because they have a skewed memory of how last-gen games look.
this is coming out this year
It must be pretty shitty to be a dev and create such detailed environments, only for people to turn around and psis all over your efforts because they have a skewed memory of how last-gen games look.
Lol, its going to be order a pizza and get a weapon dlc or something.
Wouldnt you rather save up for a PC?
Im not going to be hyped for this because I know it'll be a big pile of broken shit at launch.
Dying Light fps it's absolutely fine. A graphic comparable made me happy.People in here actually complaining about graphics like this game's framerate wouldn't chug it into oblivion if it was anything remotely close to Witcher 3.
Man....
It seems like theres no green/brown filter.
That alone is enough to make my hype go through the roof.
With Sony or Microsoft PR/DLC deals? Any bets?
does anyone like before and after shoots?
Lol, its going to be order a pizza and get a weapon dlc or something.
It looks great. If there are going to be comparisons to TW3, I'd much rather it be about the quality of the quest design and writing. Other than that, I don't see the two series being all that comparable as they are two completely different bests.
Seriously, massive upgrade in that department, even if it is not the most technically impressive game.
What previous bethesda games were broken at launch?
Cuz it came out super early in the generation, before there was a ton of big name games to compare it to like we have now.Oblivion was pretty impressive when it came out.
Have you honestly looked at the pictures of fallout 3 posted here? It looks pretty awful, you're remembering it without hindsight, the difference is huge.graphically it really isnt even a skip past FO3/NV
but i for one am willing to sacrifice that for frame rate and gameplay potential and a much bigger world
quite frankly im more/less content with FO3 graphics on max settings if the above is applicable
What previous bethesda games were broken at launch?
There is a reason why lots of devs don't come here anymore.
Fucking hell, that looks shocking. Damn it bethesda, hire some actual coders.
I just had an email from GMG which implied that it is coming out this year.
Many responses in this thread is why i'm sure the core gaming market's decline is as much to do with the publishers and devs as it is to do with the gamers. Damn i'm having an headache with the amount of people freaking out over visuals in Fallout by Bethesda no less
Fucking hell, that looks shocking. Damn it bethesda, hire some actual coders.
Looks amazing! Not shocked at the typical "shit grafix, shit game." comments from people who apparently haven't played a Bethesda game before...
The art direction alone looks heaps better.
What do you mean by pushed?I've just had that too. But then they've also pushed arkham knight.
If we're talking PS3, every single Bethesda RPG.
Dying Light fps it's absolutely fine. A graphic comparable made me happy.
900p 30 fps with this graphic? O_O If they can't handle this game at 1080p better they change their job.I guess the scope of the game must be much bigger than its predecessors to have to make visual sacrifices. Honestly though, considering other WRPGs in the previous generation, were we expecting FO4 to look more stunning that TW3 (especially given how it suffers from myriad issues on PS4)?
Personally, I just hope they can lock the performance down to at least 30fps (900p ftw) although, with V.A.T.S. it's framerate is bit less of an issue during combat.