About the short, unexplained replies. Was playing LoL and replying between que pops/deaths. Back to your list.
1 - Kark has said that he purposely put the roles in a certain way. So saying "why would 2 mafia be in gossip chat" doesn't really amount to anything.
It amounts to plenty. Kark's placements are not random. From Kark's behavior, I think it's unlikely to have two mafia in the same gossip chat. Unless we're talking about a whole lot of mafia, which is also unlikely. It's probably just 3-4.
2 - Here is the post about you suggesting Hobo should be investigated.
Then you defend him saying:
Could be a case of you buying Hobo another day to think up a lie and also gaining yourself cred saying, "I can't be HHA, I pointed the investigation toward an HHA."
That makes sense. Try to earn cred with the townies by throwing one of our own under the bus. And yet...
Your only defense to explain painting a target on your back is "wanted to distract mafia". Which makes no sense at all, unless you want the mafia to attack you to flip you.
It makes perfect sense without this whole lost partner drama. You're looking at things too narrow. At the time, I thought "I rather they kill me than a power townie". Also your reply to my earlier explanation was this:
Understandable I guess. Still not sold on Hobo being town aligned though. He didn't even mention being town aligned in role descript.
You found my explanation for my cagey ordinary townie behavior as "understandable" but now suddenly it "makes no sense at all".
Your defense about being confused for the Salva vote is kinda weak as well. I myself had posted the voting update at the time and Kark posted an official one as well. With Darryl, you can sorta tell he was trying to undo the tie. With you, you waited for 2-3 minutes to pass, then posted a msg to me w/o changing your vote. Then conveniently posted a new vote a minute after deadline.
My excuse is certainly not any weaker than what you've been justifying for my eviction. I already said that I thought you voted for a tie. I counted up the votes, but when you switched your vote in the last few minutes, I thought it was a new vote. I did what I thought I had to do to avoid a tie.
And then I realized my mistake and voted for Hobodobo to end the tie. However I was late by at least a minute.
Also this bit "With Darryl, you can sorta tell he was trying to undo the tie." He didn't post anything like "hey guys I'm gonna change my vote to Ourobolus". You're reaching here!
Lets not forget you posted this reply to my explanation about my confusion:
Maybe it was, idk. Misread Darryl's post.
So during that moment, you were also confused about what the real vote count was. It's okay for you have confusion, but not me?
Why didn't you vote for Hobo last day phase? You called the investigation on him, saw it all unfold and still didn't vote for w/e reason. You say you were watchin soccer, which is true, since you had like 20 posts in the soccer thread during that day phase as well. You found time enuff to post random stuff and reply to LMQ's post replying about Maz putting the nail in Hobo's coffin. But still didn't vote. One of your posts for that day is suggesting Hobo to come up with a lie
I didn't vote for Hobodobo because I didn't want to end the day too early, and it was gonna happen sooner or later. There was no threat of Hobodobo NOT getting evicted.
About me suggesting Hobo to come up with a lie. I wasn't suggesting he come up with a lie, I was implying he might be scum and is trying to create a lie to make sense of his role. And he did make up a (clever) role description.
or at least come up with a convincing lie.
I don't see how you can look at that post (and the original post it was replying to) and think that's somehow evidence towards my mafianess.
You simply don't have a retort for my contradicting behavior! In your second point you say that I wanted to earn some cred. But how does that explain my behavior towards Hobodo? Why try to "earn cred" by throwing hobodobo under the bus...and then do everything my power (despite causing great suspicion) to save him?
It's contradicts so bad, like peanut butter and mayonnaise. So lets update this, a vote for me is a vote on the assumption that:
1) You believe in the likelihood of two mafia in the same gossip. There might be a total of 3-4 mafia.
2) You believe I was trying to gain the trust of the townies by throwing Hobodob under the bus, asking franconp to investigate him.
3) You believe despite me trying to earn the trust of the townies, I then throw that trust under suspicion by doing everything I can to save Hobodobo at the very last second. You believe I did that because ????
Ezekiel is reaching. He believes that I thought Hobodobo was expendable but at the
same time was so not expendable. So non-expendable that I was willing to throw all suspicion upon me by saving him at the last second. Ezekiel looks at only one piece, my refusal to role claim easily, as the main issue. And he is willing to ignore clear contradictions to reach his conclusion. Lets not waste a vote here, vote for someone else.
#dontvoteforkingkitty2016
