So, is there significant Sony funding or not? Is the game console exclusive to PS4 or not? We still don't seem to have any straightforward answers and that is a real problem. People can trash Kuchera's Polygon article all they want, I'm assuming out of love for the Shenmue franchise, but it raises valid and important questions. When a Kickstarter game appears on the E3 stage of a platform holder it is natural to ask what part said holder plays on the development of the game.
As I said before, I am not at all opposed to the idea of using Kickstarter in order to secure more funds and bring a niche project to life. However, when you are asking people to pay for a product that they will get after several years you need to be absolutely transparent about a) what kind of product it will be, what its scope will be depending on the amount raised, b) how much money you will need to complete it and c) where that money will come from. From my point of view the Shenmue Kickstarter campaign failed on all three fronts.
During the span of a few days we've heard several different versions about Sony's involvement with the project. At first it was "we just want to help out a friend so we're giving him the stage", then it was "if fans back it we will absolutely make this a reality", which is what got everyone thinking that Sony was heavily investing in the project and sparked the backlash, and now it's "we'll help with marketing and pay for a PS4 version". If I got something wrong please correct me, there have been so many confusing and contrasting statements that I may still have it wrong.
I suppose I am going to be called out as a 'concern troll', the idiotic blanket statement that is lately being used to deflect all criticism and dismiss legitimate concerns. There is an unbelievable amount of hostility being directed towards people who are basically saying "when you are asking for money directly from consumers in order to fund the game you have to be as clear and transparent as possible".
Why didn't everyone say the truth from the beginning? Kickstarter backers will fund most of the development and determine the game's scope, some external investors will chip in, Sony will pay for the PS4 port and some of the marketing. Clear as day. Would anyone have a problem with that? Why did we have to put up with all this obfuscation in the first place?
No need to directly play the victim role....
Anyway, I agree that to a certain extent the information policy isn't the best.
It all started with the kickstarter page itself, which kinda felt rushed and not fully thought out.
Both with informations itself and other things like the rewards that aren't all that interesting compared to other projects.
The rest of your criticism is partly right and partly wrong.
The scope of the game and in particular how comparable it is to the older titles is something that's definitely missing.
I get that they need to be a bit more flexible with that model kickstarter, still they should have taken a bit more time to sell their actual vision.
These informartions are a bit sparse, because just saying a it's a sequel isn't gonna help us that much with a game that's already that old.
The AMA wasn't that informative either, not many details were shared and the answers in general were a bit short.
Apart from that it's been pretty clear.
Sony is helping with marketing/development and will fund sum x, don't ever think they will openly declare what kind of sum that will be.
That's something they obviously won't do.
Same goes for the game being exclusive on consoles, there are working contracts and if there are any changes (the announcements of other platforms or other parties involved in funding the game), they got a certain time to announce it.
And obviously we don't know what else is part of the contract, for example if there is a flexible budget/funding or things that still have to be decided.
I mean Boyes made it pretty clear that they choose that role to skip the process of aquiring the funds at Sony in the usual manner, which would have taken alot more time...
With the kickstarter method they can measure the demand more easily and therefore aquire the necessary funds or get even more.
This is surely something that will develop over time and is nothing we will ever hear about, so it will lead to nothing to speculate about things like that.
It's certainly easier to convince the higher ups at Sony who will greenlight the funding to invest even more, if the Kickstarter is a big sucess...
Being flexible about something like that shouldn't suprise anyone, especially with a case like Shenmue.
Why would Boyes meet Suzuki for years, if they just paid for marketing and the PS4 version ?