Looks impressive. Just not fun.
Of course.
Looks impressive. Just not fun.
I'll say this as someone who was unimpressed by the footage: people need to define what they mean by impressive. Graphically I think the game looks great but as far as gameplay, it really didn't impress me. You can say a bunch of stuff like "the transitions were seamless," "PHYSEX," or "you can actually drive the car now,"" but all of those do not cover up the fact that it was a slightly more advanced on rails section. I am more interested in gameplay experiences that are created by the player due to interaction with a sandbox, not what someone else thinks looks really cool for one playthrough.
How can you tell its not fun if you are not playing it yourself?
They also did that remaster in about 6 to 8 months if I'm not mistaken.
Oh most certainly. But I don't know if I ever would have thought it's "world changing" the media just went too wild over something we couldn't see ourselves. So it's not like I'm blaming ND, but I think it would have been better to show the demo to everyone at the same timeYou have to understand how unfair that is. The press hyped it the fuck up, but it was glorious. Imagine if PlayStation said "fuck the time frame" and threw this entire demo on their E3 stage? You would've been super blown away.
This was demonstrated at PSX.I'll say this as someone who was unimpressed by the footage: people need to define what they mean by impressive. Graphically I think the game looks great but as far as gameplay, it really didn't impress me. You can say a bunch of stuff like "the transitions were seamless," "PHYSEX," or "you can actually drive the car now,"" but all of those do not cover up the fact that it was a slightly more advanced on rails section. I am more interested in gameplay experiences that are created by the player due to interaction with a sandbox, not what someone else thinks looks really cool for one playthrough. And yes, I understand that that may not be what uncharted is, but that doesn't mean that I can't criticize the game for being what it is.
I'll say this as someone who was unimpressed by the footage: people need to define what they mean by impressive. Graphically I think the game looks great but as far as gameplay, it really didn't impress me. You can say a bunch of stuff like "the transitions were seamless," "PHYSEX," or "you can actually drive the car now,"" but all of those do not cover up the fact that it was a slightly more advanced on rails section. I am more interested in gameplay experiences that are created by the player due to interaction with a sandbox, not what someone else thinks looks really cool for one playthrough. And yes, I understand that that may not be what uncharted is, but that doesn't mean that I can't criticize the game for being what it is.
I can understand that opinion and believe it is a legitimate one, which is why I think it is ridiculous when people act like you cannot also have a negative opinion of the uncharted series. Both viewpoints are valid.
To me, uncharted is about playing a movie action hero with scenarios ripped from classic movies (most notable Indiana Jones)
The linear nature may put you off from a gameplay perspective, but if you were playing the game not knowing what was coming next, I bet you would be more in to the scene moment to moment
Looks impressive. Just not fun.
Looks impressive. Just not fun.
This was demonstrated at PSX.
So this argument also applies to people saying it *does* look fun, too?How can you tell its not fun if you are not playing it yourself?
Probably posted already but here is a YT mirror
Holy shit are people seriously not impressed? To me that looked amazing. People are hard to impress these days
But we are not talking about the psx footage are we? This thread is about this new demo that was supposed to be super impressive. For me it wasn't.
Looks impressive. Just not fun.
lol, ok. And what does look "fun" in your opinion?
But we are not talking about the psx footage are we? This thread is about this new demo that was supposed to be super impressive. For me it wasn't.
I'll say this as someone who was unimpressed by the footage: people need to define what they mean by impressive. Graphically I think the game looks great but as far as gameplay, it really didn't impress me. You can say a bunch of stuff like "the transitions were seamless," "PHYSEX," or "you can actually drive the car now,"" but all of those do not cover up the fact that it was a slightly more advanced on rails section. I am more interested in gameplay experiences that are created by the player due to interaction with a sandbox, not what someone else thinks looks really cool for one playthrough. And yes, I understand that that may not be what uncharted is, but that doesn't mean that I can't criticize the game for being what it is.
Seriously, people.Don't. C'mon don't.
Will his answer actually satisfy you? Or will it just be confirmation of what you already believe his character to be?
You said you were looking for sandbox gameplay and you implied that Uncharted 4 doesn't have that.But we are not talking about the psx footage are we? This thread is about this new demo that was supposed to be super impressive. For me it wasn't.
It's Seanspeed. He has a lot of opinions on things he has never tried or knows about. Just move on lol.How can you tell its not fun if you are not playing it yourself?
I'll say this as someone who was unimpressed by the footage: people need to define what they mean by impressive. Graphically I think the game looks great but as far as gameplay, it really didn't impress me. You can say a bunch of stuff like "the transitions were seamless," "PHYSEX," or "you can actually drive the car now,"" but all of those do not cover up the fact that it was a slightly more advanced on rails section. I am more interested in gameplay experiences that are created by the player due to interaction with a sandbox, not what someone else thinks looks really cool for one playthrough. And yes, I understand that that may not be what uncharted is, but that doesn't mean that I can't criticize the game for being what it is.
Holy shit are people seriously not impressed? To me that looked amazing. People are hard to impress these days
You said you were looking for sandbox gameplay and you implied that Uncharted 4 doesn't have that.
The media just went a little too nuts, especially gamesradar
http://www.gamesradar.com/extended-uncharted-4-e3-demo/
graphics are more important to me, but if there's one dev who'd be able to maintain their vision of the game graphically while still doing 60fps, it's ND.I would have found it especially not refreshing if an Uncharted game failed to exhibit industry-leading fidelity.
speaking of mp...I noticed on the twitch comments section that ND responded "no word yet" for a coop mode.Me too. I was excited for that 60fps thingie but I had my doubts that they could pull it off. Still, I won't complain like I did with Ratchet And Clank doing 30fps on PS4.
Having 60fps for the multiplayer is awesome though.
If we are going to be picky about sentence fragments and singular words to criticize people's opinions, we might as well go into what we mean by "sandboxy".You said you were looking for sandbox gameplay and you implied that Uncharted 4 doesn't have that.
I'll say this as someone who was unimpressed by the footage: people need to define what they mean by impressive. Graphically I think the game looks great but as far as gameplay, it really didn't impress me. You can say a bunch of stuff like "the transitions were seamless," "PHYSEX," or "you can actually drive the car now,"" but all of those do not cover up the fact that it was a slightly more advanced on rails section. I am more interested in gameplay experiences that are created by the player due to interaction with a sandbox, not what someone else thinks looks really cool for one playthrough. And yes, I understand that that may not be what uncharted is, but that doesn't mean that I can't criticize the game for being what it is.
graphics are more important to me, but if there's one dev who'd be able to maintain their vision of the game graphically while still doing 60fps, it's ND.
speaking of mp...I noticed on the twitch comments section that ND responded "no word yet" for a coop mode.
ugh.
i'm one who wants splitscreen and as unlikely as that may be, that was a new addition to Uc3. It'd be a bummer if they take it out of Uc4.
I wouldn't care about that. I'm a big believer in local mp being the true mp. Not that online isn't important, but I hate that the industry is slowly forgetting about two+ friends sitting on a couch playing through a game together.I wouldn't keep my hopes up, but I guess it's a possibility if they're honestly targeting 60fps, splitscreen would theoretically run at 30.
So you've played this game already? Amazing how you guys don't realize the obvious flaw in this line of thinking.It's Seanspeed. He has a lot of opinions on things he has never tried or knows about. Just move on lol.
I wouldn't keep my hopes up, but I guess it's a possibility if they're honestly targeting 60fps, splitscreen would theoretically run at 30.
Agreed.I wouldn't care about that. I'm a big believer in local mp being the true mp. Not that online isn't important, but I hate that the industry is slowly forgetting about two+ friends sitting on a couch playing through a game together.
So basically the gameplay sucks since it's not an open world sandbox game? In what universe does that resemble Uncharted?
Games are entertainment experiences. Not all games have to be deeply interactive sandbox experiences to be good. The devs are trying to tell a story in a fun, action-packed way. Their way. And most people would agree that they're really fucking good at it. You'll probably enjoy more games if you appreciate them for what they're trying to achieve rather than how they compare to other games.
Looks impressive. Just not fun.
I'll say this as someone who was unimpressed by the footage: people need to define what they mean by impressive. Graphically I think the game looks great but as far as gameplay, it really didn't impress me. You can say a bunch of stuff like "the transitions were seamless," "PHYSEX," or "you can actually drive the car now,"" but all of those do not cover up the fact that it was a slightly more advanced on rails section. I am more interested in gameplay experiences that are created by the player due to interaction with a sandbox, not what someone else thinks looks really cool for one playthrough. And yes, I understand that that may not be what uncharted is, but that doesn't mean that I can't criticize the game for being what it is.
It is up here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BPSX38PmIQ
I understand. However, the beginning portion has multiple routes the player can take.I didn't mean to imply that. I meant to say that this section didn't show sandbox gameplay, therefore it wasn't interesting to me.
Surely more open ended unlike past games in the series.If we are going to be picky about sentence fragments and singular words to criticize people's opinions, we might as well go into what we mean by "sandboxy".
This makes no sense why would come into a thread about a game knowing what type of game it is just to criticize it.
It's like going into a fighting game thread and complain it's a fighting game.