Blackleg-sanji1
Banned
His post was fine until he went and said fire the whole team..now thats hyperbole
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Fallout 4 - PS4 screenshots (now feat. PNGs)
- Thread starter Kenzodielocke
- Start date
- Status
No I'm referring to your hyperbole filled comment.
I'd put money on it being a last-gen title that was made strictly current-gen due to technical issues.
I don't think so. If you actually played previous Fallout/Elder Scroll games, all of them have below average graphics. Yet their open world is massive and contains over 100~200 hours of contents. Developer probably choose to focus on contents than graphics which I prefer them to do.
Beelzebufo
Banned
Wait, how much is the season pass for this game again?
Blackleg-sanji1
Banned
Except for the fact fallout has a season pass and will most likely(given their track record) have patches to?
29.99
Crossing Eden
Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
No I said for all we know. I wasn't confirming anything. Was merely presenting a hypothetical because people were complaining about lack of footage.
Bethesda isn't far off from Ubisoft now. Even F4 is heading towards more of a casual path.
Not to sound elitist.
Nah. Bethesda can do better; they did Skyrim.
There's something up. I can't imagine why it would look so bad in any context other than being a remastered last-gen port.
$30.
And I can guarantee you would get your money's worth.
Skyrim looked like shit.
how? wtf
Kenzodielocke
Banned
Oh okay. So then my guess is we won't see anyhting until the 9th.
N30RYU
Member
I would be really impressed if this wasn't a PS360 game at start and they just ported the game... but that doesn't justify the lack of 60fps even being open world.
Blackleg-sanji1
Banned
Lol this is crazy man! Screw it fallout 4 GOAT and any other fallout after it
The Baron Count
Member
Compared to what? It looked better than just about every other open world game on consoles at the time.
Saying it looked like shit is an objectively wrong statement. There are a bazillion games that look like shit. Skyrim wasn't one of them.
As does this, but I'm not seeing a relative improvement comparable to other 'last game on last-gen, first game on current-gen' games. This looks like a last-gen port.
How can you guarantee anything?
ikr. its like a sin complain about something that you are paying full price just because is bethesda game.
i thought platinum and fromsoft fans were the worst ( not in a bad way lol)
Crossing Eden
Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
That is just as likely, hopefully we get footage sooner tho.
Because I've played Oblivion, Fallout 3, and Skyrim. All three of those have had DLC worth my time and money.
Except your point still isn't really that good because you, like several other people in the thread act like game developers have to check specific boxes, and are required by the laws of gaming to allocate as much resource as equally possibly to all these different places.
In other words, you think it's a REQUIREMENT that Bethesda games should have amazing mindblowing graphics, because it's a post-apoc game that makes millions.
Have you ever considered that MAYBE, they don't care about the graphics as much, because they know most of the fans don't either? Yes, it would be nice if Fallout had great graphics, but it didn't the last two times, and it doesn't now.
They added a full, dynamic extremely in-depth crafting and building system, where almost every single physical asset in the game can be picked up, rearranged, or given a purpose in gameplay. They've completely retooled the way combat and stats work. This game has 100s and 100s of NPCs, all with stats and items and behavior patterns that need to be accounted for. They literally spent over 2 years of doing the protagonist recording lines. This game has over 111,000 voiced lines, to ensure that the game delivers the same level of freedom of choice that Fallout fans have come to expect. More than Fallout 3 and Skyrim combined. They have gone above and beyond to ensure that this is an exciting, full game with a huge world.
To have the gall to say that the entire team should LOSE THEIR JOBS, because the graphics don't BLOW YOUR MIND, is childish and petty.
Beelzebufo
Banned
So $30 is okay but $40 isn't? What's the tipping point? $31? $35?
And that's why the market model works so well.
I rather play the entire thing than its pieces for a year or two (paying double the price)
When did I say $40 isn't ok? I'd pay $40 for a season pass of FO3/FNV quality. Different companies, but I liked FNV's DLC more.
You really have no idea how game development works do you?
Blackleg-sanji1
Banned
Im a huge fromsoft fan if u came at me about bloodborne and most likely dark souls 3 framerate im not going to go.."lol get use to it its a fromsoft game"fan no! Im going to agree because jus because all their games are lik thay doesn't mean they gt a pass
TheOhrenberger.
Banned
I'm really glad I don't get too picky with visuals. I feel like there are people who don't enjoy certain games just because of their visuals and that's so sad.
So you're talking out your ass. OK. I don't have a problem if you liked the DLC in those games. But you can't even guarantee you'll like FO4's DLC, let alone that we universally will. What if you end up hating the DLC?
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Not unless it breaks immersion. People like to feel immersed in the gaming world as well.
WadiumArcadium
Member
Yep. Delving into these threads always makes me shake my head.
legacyzero
Banned
Historically, Fallout games have produced some of my favorite expansions, namely Dead Money and Point Lookout. So if we're going by the past releases, it'll be awesome.
Blackleg-sanji1
Banned
Quote the amount of people saying they wont play because of the graphics. I wanna see
Green Yoshi
Member
No, I'm talking from EXPERIENCE. Get over yourself, past results are indicators of future results.
All he said was he feels like there are people who won't enjoy because of it. Nothing about not playing. Which is a completely understandable thing to assume. Calm down.
LookAtMeGo
Member
Show me in that post where he says people don't play games because of bad graphics.
Unless you've played FO4's DLC, you are not speaking from experience.
.
It all adds to the experience of playing a game.
If the graphics turn people off from the game, then that's their 'problem'. But I can't look at those images, despite the fun I'm sure the game will be, and think anything other than "That looks bad".
John Kowalski
Banned
??
don't you have other games for that
If I think Uncharted 1-3 and the Last of Us was great, am I wrong to assume Uncharted 4 and Last of Us 2 will be at least pretty good?
Blackleg-sanji1
Banned
If that wasn't what he was implying why say it? We are talking about graphics because its a screenshot thread.
that doesnt make sense when you have the witcher 3 in all platforms
Well.. That pretty much explain the bad graphics. They pretty much made it 2 years ago and concentrated in the voice overs. Thinking that way you convinced me to buy the GOTY version with 75% off.
- Status