• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NXGamer first look at XboxOne version of Just Cause 3 (hint: it's baaaaaad)

All the whining about this, and the average framerate in the video is 27.something....I'm stuck wondering how is that bad? The crashing, the long load times - yes, bitch about those. But 27 fps average is hardly a slideshow.
It averages at 27 because it holds 30 when absolutely nothing is happening. It plummets to low 20's/high teens whenever there's any sort of chaotic action going on, which unfortunately happens to be the entire point of the game.
 
It ain't all good in PC Land either, Arkham Knight says hi.

Well, to be completely fair, that's one bad PC port. Consoles have had The Witcher 3, Mad Max, Syndicate, Fallout 4, Just Cause 3, Black Ops 3 (campaign mode), and Bloodborne (framepacing issues) this year alone.

Not shitting on anyone's favorite platforms, but this year has been generally really good for PC games.
 
Well if they dont show off the console versions beforehand how could a potential buyer know?

Not knowing that a game performs badly is understandable, although I would ask why you wouldn't wait a few days to get solid reports on the version you are interested in. I am talking about fully knowing that a game performs badly and dismissing it as no big deal.
 

Ragona

Member
I guess alot of developers went abit overboard with their scope for next gen games, not anticipating the cpu issues on open world games (which are becoming the norme it seems).
Games like Arkham City show, how good a game can look and run when the scope is appropiate.
 
Well, to be completely fair, that's one bad PC port. Consoles have had The Witcher 3, Mad Max, Fallout 4, Just Cause 3, Black Ops 3 (campaign mode), and Bloodborne (framepacing issues) this year alone.

Not shitting on anyone's favorite platforms, but this year has been generally really good for PC games.

I wish more people understood that fact. We've had two full years of next gen releases and in almost every single Digital Foundry Face-Off the PC version easily came out on top, not only on the enthusiast end of the spectrum but also on the budget one, with the bargain bin Core i3/750Ti combo matching or even surpassing console performance.
 
I wish more people understood that fact. We've had two full years of next gen releases and in almost every single Digital Foundry Face-Off the PC version easily came out on top, not only on the enthusiast end of the spectrum but also on the budget one, with the bargain bin Core i3/750Ti combo matching or even surpassing console performance.

Yeah, I don't remember a single terrible PC port since the beginning of this gen except ACU (which was also broken on consoles) and Arkham Knight. I wish people would realize it's an exception, not the rule.
 

Crossing Eden

Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
It ain't all good in PC Land either, Arkham Knight says hi.
Ok. Can people seriously stop bring up Batman on pc in every single game analysis thread where the console versions have a ton of performance issues as if Batman on pc is in anyway shape or form the norm or anywhere close to the state of what games most games on pc launch with? It's so asinine.
 
I wish more people understood that fact. We've had two full years of next gen releases and in almost every single Digital Foundry Face-Off the PC version easily came out on top, not only on the enthusiast end of the spectrum but also on the budget one, with the bargain bin Core i3/750Ti combo matching or even surpassing console performance.

Yeah, I don't remember a single terrible PC port since the beginning of this gen except ACU (which was also broken on consoles) and Arkham Knight. I wish people would realize it's an exception, not the rule.

It already has become the 'fuel' for them though, which is kinda amusing.
 

MMaRsu

Banned
Not knowing that a game performs badly is understandable, although I would ask why you wouldn't wait a few days to get solid reports on the version you are interested in. I am talking about fully knowing that a game performs badly and dismissing it as no big deal.

Well since jc 2 ran great on 360 I had faith in avalanche :s
 
Did he say....15 minute loading times???

UXOgyds.gif
 

ISee

Member
It ain't all good in PC Land either, Arkham Knight says hi.

Let Batman go, he deserves to die a hero and not be brought back in threads long enough to become the villain.

Honestly, out of all the great PC releases this year Batman is the huge exception.
 

KingBroly

Banned
Between this and the whole Tomb Raider deal, I now recognize Square Enix as a company that makes more bad decisions than good video games.

You should've seen them last gen. Especially the Japanese side of things. Very poor games across the board, and they really didn't have much to boast about.

Considering how poorly most open world games have been running this, year it's pretty interesting that Witcher 3 came through it all the most unscathed. It had quite a few problems, but a lot of them were fixed over time.
 

Behlel

Member
Who cares about PC in a technical analysis for the Xbox one version of the game?
Let's stay in topic and judge what we see here please.
 

Xater

Member
I am having fun with Just Cause 3 but on a technical level it's a mess on PS4 as well. It seems like as soon as a certain amount of physics objects are doing their thing the frame rate just tanks. I noticed this right at the start of the game when they make you blow up that bridge. I suspect the bad CPU in these consoles are a bottleneck but as a dev you should then scale that physics interaction back. I am really not surprised they have always just shown off the PC version.

In regards to the load times, I have noticed the game having issues keeping a connection to the Square Enix servers. Telling it to go to offline mode doesn't help either because it will just try again after a couple of minutes. When I disconnect my console from the internet and the game doesn't try to connect all the time the load times are slightly better.

No crashes on PS4 here and I have probably played 15 to 20 hours.
 
This looks like badly optimized code and/or not enough time in the oven. When GTAV looks and runs much better than this crap, there is no excuse specially on the ps4
 

Dazza

Member
If it's the physics which is causing the FPS to tank, they really should be shifting it off to the GPU, that afterall is a strength of these consoles
 

Behlel

Member
This looks like badly optimized code and/or not enough time in the oven. When GTAV looks and runs much better than this crap, there is no excuse specially on the ps4
You know, different team, different engine and different scope: JC3 is like an hulk game, you go around messing with thing, shoot everything you want, destroy everything, it's a very chaotic game. GTA is a lot slower then this even if it look better and have a lot of fun the only thing you can destroy are the cars.
The fact that this is terribly optimized is another thing but you know very different game and different budget.
 

Rich!

Member
Glad I got the PC version. £15 well spent, I hope.

We shall see tomorrow - I've got it preloaded and ready to go
 
From what TotalBiscuit said, the pc version is decent but it needs a beefy computer, don't think you are going to move it at 60fps with a mid-spec machine.
 

Litri

Member
I have a couple of friends also annoyed by the perfomance. Now I wonder if all videos/trailers they released were of the PC version running on a high-end PC.
 
Dips to 17fps seemed bad in that video. Terrible slowdown that makes the already clunky shooting seem even worse.

And 15 minute load times? That's completely unacceptable
.
Invest in a decent PC people. Better than these toasters.

Good God man stop creaming yourself.
 

Lucifon

Junior Member
It is a technical mess from an optimisation standpoint sadly. It was much much worse before the day one patch though.

I'm unsure about the memory leak thing though, I played my Xbone online and had no long loading issues, yet when online with the servers constantly disconnecting and reconnecting (including mid load) is when I encountered the crazy long load issue a couple of times.
 

SparkTR

Member
I have a couple of friends also annoyed by the perfomance. Now I wonder if all videos/trailers they released were of the PC version running on a high-end PC.

They confirmed that was the case a long time ago. If I remember right the first we saw of a console version were leaked streams on Twitch.
 

IvanJ

Banned
Tin foil hat theory:
Square Enix purposely encouraged (allowed) breaking the street date, so they can sell as much as possible before the crappiness is exposed.
 

John Wick

Member
I imagine the game does run on a mid spec PC insanely well. However a mid spec CPU now.....destroys anything in these consoles. Look at how well some 2011 i5's run compared to the laptop style ones in the console. They really should have put at least a halfway decent processor in the consoles.

Yeah I'm sure when they designed these consoles a mid spec PC would have cost £349???
 
Memory leaks still....I'm sure there was a memory leak on jc1 pc that never got fixed....had to restart the game every half hour to speed it up again.
 

Alienous

Member
I would have bought this shoddy piece of shit. Of perhaps all the games in these recent months, aside from MGSV and even above Fallout 4, I was waiting to get this full-price day one.

Fucking terrible.
 
Top Bottom