• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

[Update: Phil Spencer says no 4K mandate, devs can make 1080p game with Scorpio]

StudioTan

Hold on, friend! I'd love to share with you some swell news about the Windows 8 Metro UI! Wait, where are you going?
This makes zero sense.

Build a 6TF machine but without a 4k TV the games won't look any better than on the XB1? Nonsense.
 

gofreak

GAF's Bob Woodward
it doesn't make sense, i mean if that console could run games at 4k/30fps will run games at 1080/2160 / 60fps for sure

Well, not quite so for sure necessarily, depending on other resources in the system. And how the dev is making the game and dealing with framerate.

This makes zero sense.

Build a 6TF machine but without a 4k TV the games won't look any better than on the XB1? Nonsense.


A 1080p output downsampled from 4K will look better than XB1 output. It might not be how you would choose to spend those resources if you were targeting 1080p with that power as a baseline, however - it wouldn't give you the same results, the same per pixel complexity and 'richness' as leveraging that power at a 1080p target. But it'll give a cleaner image.
 

RoKKeR

Member
Whatever is happening right now with console hardware, the transition is going to be ugly. This seems so strange to me. And to think they have already managed to fuck up their messaging, when the whole point of announcing the console was to control the messaging over the next year.

This seems like a blunder. Wonder if we can expect them to respond. Feel like I've time traveled back to 2013, reading an article headline about MS thinking "what are you doing?"

And saying it's a premium device that will cost more than the current models, one of which is 399...yikes
 

greenegt

Member
Bruh, once you've seen 4K downsampled to 1080p for the first time it's life changing. Everything just looks so clean, detail pops more, it's amazing.

I refuse to believe they wouldn't allow customers with 1080p sets to have that benefit if they buy Scorpio if this thing can really do native 4K.

I agree. It would be completely asinine for them to release Scorpio and not let devs show off at 1080p 60fps. MS just needs to be clear with their messaging.
 

dealer-

Member
Launching two new consoles at the same event was always going to lead to mixed messages and dumb PR speak .
 

Bgamer90

Banned
So, will the Scorpio just play games in "original Xbox One mode" if it detects that a user's TV resolution is 1080p? "Scorpio mode" will just be for user's with 4K TVs? That's the only way this statement can make sense to me.

I mean, you can still see improvements in Xbox One games over Xbox 360 if you have a 720p TV. Same was true for 360 games vs. Original Xbox for people with 480p TVs.

I really don't get why it's so hard to keep their messaging clear about improvements that should be pretty straightforward.
 

c0de

Member
If you're a developer targetting a cross Scorpio/XB1 game, and the Scorpio is targetting 4k resolution that basically sucks up all your extra processing power. If your frame rates stay the same, AI and game logic etc all the same you don't need more CPU.

Requirements for games will get higher inevitably, also the GPU relies on a CPU - these are not parts of a computer that live on their own.
Again, current gen games are already struggling with the low CPU power - there will be a different CPU.

You need a few years for 14nm to mature. If you want a 4/8 core Zen level CPU plus at least a doubling of GPU performance over scorpio that'll be a big-ass APU and you want mature processes for that. Its really early right now - even the 1080 is only a 300sqmm chip

14nm to mature? The GPU will be 14nm, the Xbone S will be, Neo will be, a PS4 slim will be. What do you want to mature? It will be a challenge for a big APU, of course, but I really don't see that as a big problem as Scorpio will launch fall next year.
 

III-V

Member
This does not make sense, and I don't believe it. Without a doubt, Scorpio will support 1080p TVs and monitors.
 

dh4niel

Member
If the don't have a 1080p60 option in the console's video menu it's almost pointless. At least at lot of these games are coming to PC too. :p
 

jfoul

Member
C'mon Microsoft!

Spin, spin, spin.

Even the Xbox 360 & PS3 had better graphics and frame rates in Standard Definition Mode back in the day. It's silly to omit this basic console option in 2017. The Scorpio better have graphics presets for 4K UHD - SD resolutions or I'm out.
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
I agree. It would be completely asinine for them to release Scorpio and not let devs show off at 1080p 60fps. MS just needs to be clear with their messaging.

The more options you give devs, the more complex it gets for them to support everything. Arguably it will be simpler for them to take an XB1 game and run it at the same detail level but at 4k instead of 1080p. Maybe the tools MS is providing makes that even more straightforward and transparent?

Also fits into what MS wants the marketing message around scorpio to be - 4k4k4k. If devs start to go 'well we want to do 1080p/60 with more details' that starts to cloud that 4k message from MS.
 
Microsoft drops a bollocks once again! Do they ever learn. I don't want 4k games I want 1080p with better effects and physics etc.. This is lost on me now let's see what sony does
 

viHuGi

Banned
So

Xbox One - 720-900p sub 30 fps
Xbox S - 1080p sub 30 fps
Xbox Scorpio - 4k sub 30 fps

that would be hilarous if true

Meanwhile Ps4 Neo 1440p downsampled to 1080p Ultra Settings 60fps baby :D

Gotta do it haha but on a serious note man i hope Scorpio works great on 1080p tvs will ultra settings, like 2 different conf for both people with 1080p tvs and 4K, you choose what you want and i want 1080p 60 pls.
 

Sjefen

Member
So UWP will be used for every console/phones/tablets/pc and it will just be upscaling/downscaling on which device you play on. So if you buy a scorpio its just for the 4k resolution and not "better" gfx(unless devs develope specific for the scorpio)? Is this right, I am little confused.
 

Aceofspades

Banned
Seems like they regret their amature move announcing Scorpio 16 months before launch.

That's one way to cannibalize your current XboneS sales.
 
They touted this as the "this is for you" and the "we listened" console. So what they should do is put up a Scorpio website, where gamers can go and state what they really want from the new machine.
 

JackHerer

Member
Chasing 4k on console seems like a fool's errand to me considering 4K isn't even widely adopted in the PC space yet. They would be much better off sticking with 1080p for a few more years and dumping that extra power into things other than resolution (effects, textures, great antialiasing, larger environments, framerate, etc.).

I was excited for Scorpio but this, plus the no exclusives thing, is really kinda lame to me. Seems like a dumb decision on MS part.
 
It's like they've gone from positive spinning of bad news in the XB1 days to negative spinning of good news with Scorpio... "Please, don't get excited about our new expensive console!"
 
Huh, yah makes no sense. Pretty sure there is going to be down sampling. Also wouldn't it be up to the devs on what they wanna do in terms of resolution?

I'm not all concerned honestly, I just think they are focusing too much on the 4k aspect of the console. As he states it will still run on 1080p screens.

Think a lot of what goes on with these new consoles will be up to what devs want to push.

Really don't think people need to get too concerned about this. Just wait and see.
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
Requirements for games will get higher inevitably, also the GPU relies on a CPU - these are not parts of a computer that live on their own.
Again, current gen games are already struggling with the low CPU power - there will be a different CPU.

Yes they are. But scorpio and Neo aren't the consoles to be raising the baseline. They're the consoles to render current games at a higher resolution. You will likely need to wait for the next revision to raise that baseline with better CPU


14nm to mature? The GPU will be 14nm, the Xbone S will be, Neo will be, a PS4 slim will be. What do you want to mature? It will be a challenge for a big APU, of course, but I really don't see that as a big problem as Scorpio will launch fall next year.

The process needs time to mature. Both Nvidia and AMD are coming to market with small dies initially. 980ti is a 600sqmm chip. 1080 is a 300sqmm chip and 480 is a 250sqmm chip. There are already rumours of yield issues on 1080 so it *will* take time for AMD to be able to produce large 14nm chips with high yields - important to make the cost acceptable for MS/Sony. It could take a couple of years.
 
1) Scorpio will have better frame rates, better graphical fidelity, VR support, 4k native resolution
2) Nahhh no point buying Scorpio unless you have a 4K TV


3) Scorpio might have exclusive games, it's up to developers
4) Scorpio won't have any exclusive games.

5) It's up to developers how to use the power
6) But it's only going to be a 4K resolution difference from original XB1.

7) Xbox Slim is slightly more powerful, Gears of War is taking advantage of extra power.
8) Xbox Slim isn't more powerful


Honestly what the fuck... MS should have their messaging on lockdown after 2013 but it's actually just as bad.
Nailed it.

I honestly might have been interested in the Xbox One if it supported Oculus Rift or (longshot) the Vive, so I didn't have to buy a new PC, but Spencer seems to be saying it won't? I'm so confused.
 
Wow this can't be entirely true, it has to be some kind of effort to put people off waiting for a Scorpio and pick up an XB1S now.

If this is true then MS are complete idiots to not use that power advantage to turn on some extra graphical bells and whistles and get games running at a rock solid 1080p/60fps. Not many people have 4k TV's yet millions have 1080p TV's why reduce your potential market size by so much, these comments from Phil make no sense at all.
 

gofreak

GAF's Bob Woodward
The more options you give devs, the more complex it gets for them to support everything. Arguably it will be simpler for them to take an XB1 game and run it at the same detail level but at 4k instead of 1080p. Maybe the tools MS is providing makes that even more straightforward and transparent?

Changing two variables is all it would take to bump the res, if the horsepower is there. It's by far the easiest 'out' MS could give devs in dealing with their Scorpio modes if they don't want to put other kinds of effort into it.

However, whether every dev would choose to use that power that way, given the choice, is another matter. But is MS giving them the choice, or are they heavily pushing for 'XB1 at 4K'?
 

Ruff

Member
This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. 4K is going to look nicer regardless of if your monitor can actually display it. The graphics are obviously going to be improved too unless barring disparity and that'll look better on any screen.
 

Bgamer90

Banned
Seems like they regret their amature move announcing Scorpio 16 months before launch.

That's one way to cannibalize your current XboneS sales.

I thought it was pretty silly during the E3 conference too BUT there would be many upset people if they bought an Xbox One S only for MS to announce the Scorpio a few months later so at least they are giving people a choice/"heads up".
 

Bl@de

Member
That's what he says now, so people buy a Xbox One S. Let's see what Phil says when the Scorpio releases. I bet that there will be Downsampling/higher FPS then. I mean they have to do it if Sony is offering it with the Neo (and that seems to be the case).
 

d9b

Banned
They touted this as the "this is for you" and the "we listened" console. So what they should do is put up a Scorpio website, where gamers can go and state what they really want from the new machine.
Maybe he was talking to those few 4K TV owners in the audience? Maybe. It's possible.
 

greenegt

Member
The more options you give devs, the more complex it gets for them to support everything. Arguably it will be simpler for them to take an XB1 game and run it at the same detail level but at 4k instead of 1080p. Maybe the tools MS is providing makes that even more straightforward and transparent?

Also fits into what MS wants the marketing message around scorpio to be - 4k4k4k. If devs start to go 'well we want to do 1080p/60 with more details' that starts to cloud that 4k message from MS.

Good point about their current marketing. I hope they are not pushing '4k or bust' with the devs. If so, that hardware better be able to deliver. I don't want to see any slowdowns on a 6 TF console.
 
I can't believe what I'm reading. This guy is killing the chances of Scorpios success months before release. This 2013 all over again. Wtf microFail??
 

padlock

Member
Seems to me they're just downplaying Scorpio so that they don't cut off Xbox One sales at the knees. When they get closer to Scorpio's release, they'll change their tune.

Which of course begs the question, why bother to announce it so far in advance ? Seems like a muddled strategy.
 

//DEVIL//

Member
When have outright lies ever been a viable PR strategy? That makes no sense. It's likely a miscommunication or Phil didn't realize what he was saying, but chalking this up to an intentional lie is the worst possible thing MS could do. Why would I continue buying products from a company that straight-up lies to pimp their current products?

You can't say its a lie though. If i remember correctly, Phill also said its almost not possible to see the difference between PS4 and Xbox one ( or something with that line back then around the xbox one post release )

You will always tell the difference. if the game is optimized for Scorpio as well as the Xbox ONE, you will see the difference. one is probably is running on full HD TV that you have on your home, the other is running on 900p on the same TV on xbox one. that alone is difference. imagine if the game is 4k native and down sampled to run on your TV. faster loading thanks to faster processor etc. more detailed graphics even if both running on HD TV. its really common sense.

If you have a GPU that can run games on 4k, yet you play it on FHD, will the image quality look the same as your other GPU that is barely running the game on FHD ? you should know better really its not even debatable.

Don't confuse marketing PR with Lies. think of it as Twisting words in favor of X.
 

gofreak

GAF's Bob Woodward
Cribbed from Bits N Pieces in the other thread...these comments seem to reinforce the idea that they view this upgrade purely through the lens of resolution and TV resolution rather than other improvements at the current (1080p) standard:

http://www.videogamer.com/news/microsoft_considered_releasing_a_more_powerful_xbox_this_year.html

"We could have done a new update this year," Spencer told Eurogamer. "We actually looked at it. We went all the way to, we had the spec in front of us, should we ship something that's less than Scorpio this year, but in truth you can't do a true 4K console this year."

Releasing an upgraded console in 2016 would have resulted in something "kind of weird in the middle" between 1080p and 4K, Spencer says.

"And I just didn't think anything between what is effectively a 1080p console and the 4K console, like, from a consumer television standpoint there's nothing in the middle," he adds. "So let's go focus on 4K and next year was the right year to do that."

This card can't run modern AAA at 4K, at least that's what I thought, I don't understand his comment.

It should more or less be able to run anything that's 1080p on XB1 at 4K. They're not looking at games with PC high settings and wondering about how to get them working at 4K. Just XB1, XB1 levels of pixel complexity.
 

Aceofspades

Banned
I thought it was pretty silly during the E3 conference too BUT there would be many upset people if they bought an Xbox One S only for MS to announce the Scorpio a few months later so at least they are giving people a choice/"heads up".

They should have just announced Xbox S as the slim model. Everyone does that, Sony did it with all Playstations. People weren't angry that they announced PS2 or PS3 later after PSONE and PS2 slim respectively.
 

AmyS

Member
6 TeraFlops

qbERBzL.jpg
 
Top Bottom