• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

SFV August and September Update Detailed (Dailies, VS CPU, Ragequitting, more)

DR2K

Banned
Decapre is basically done. They can make her a free character. Charge for the Cammy reskin bikinis.
 

MagnesD3

Member
Feel like with flagging sales, season 2 will be pandering. So:
Akuma
Sakura
Evil Ryu
Dan
Sagat
Sean

The season of shotos! I hope we get less popular guys like Oro and Sodom but I wouldn't blame Capcom for going with what'll sell while they still can.

That would be the absolute worst, I'd prefer no season 2.
 

Rudiano

Banned
『Inaba Resident』;213911652 said:
Said nothing about Akuma. Just that Sakura would never be a free character because she's very popular.

Popular among who though? the anime people? certainly not among those who play the game. Sakura has been a trash character in SF4 and games before that, I doubt she will be any good in SF5 if she joined
 

Swarna

Member
Still a bummer that they couldn't work out a model where characters are free. Not for me, personally, but for the overall competitive health of the game. You know, one of the few things this game has going for it.
 

Gren

Member
Popular among who though? the anime people? certainly not among those who play the game. Sakura has been a trash character in SF4 and games before that, I doubt she will be any good in SF5 if she joined

Give her VC/A-Groove for her VT. She's sure to be decent/more popular then.
 

Rudiano

Banned
『Inaba Resident』;213914784 said:
http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2013/...-fighter-favorite-characters-popularity-poll/

I even believe Ono said Sakura was the 2nd most popular character in Japan right behind Karin when she was announced.

But she will end up sucking as a character once again, the same thing happened for SF4 when people wanted Makoto and Ibuki to satisfy their anime needs, they both sucked and then hardly anyone played them. I hate how people vote for certain characters just because they are female and not because they actually want to play them
 
But she will end up sucking as a character once again, the same thing happened for SF4 when people wanted Makoto and Ibuki to satisfy their anime needs, they both sucked and then hardly anyone played them. I hate how people vote for certain characters just because they are female and not because they actually want to play them

Ok?
 

Rudiano

Banned
『Inaba Resident』;213915291 said:

1061715-cammy_vs_sakura.jpg
 

lupinko

Member
Still a bummer that they couldn't work out a model where characters are free. Not for me, personally, but for the overall competitive health of the game. You know, one of the few things this game has going for it.

The characters are free though, they just cost 100k FM, you don't need a season pass or real money to get them.

Don't bring up guilty gear as an example because those characters were only free during the launch period. And also Arc didn't do it for every region either.

If you were to buy Revelator now, both Kum and Dizzy are $8 each, whereas playing through the general story mode and the character story modes can get you Ibuki and Juri without any actual money spent.
 
I hate how people vote for certain characters just because they are female and not because they actually want to play them

People who want Sagat don't want female Sagat.

They want male Sagat.

Can you believe those people?

I hate how people vote for certain characters just because they are male.

See how ridiculous and sexist that sounds?

People said the same crap about Mika. "People aren't gonna actually play Mika. They just like her burbs." Then Mika turned out to be REALLY GOOD. Now, lots of people play Mika. AND, some people like her burbs. Try to stop them. You can't.

Anyone want any character in the game for whatever reason they want.
 
It would take losing around 15 to 20 straight games to drop 1,000 since we're only being matched up with people with a similar point total. So yeah that's a pretty significant amount. Nobody will be rage quitting anymore if their points are really that precious to them. Or they will try to limit quits to one every once in a while.
 

Hyun Sai

Member
Well, I don't really care. If I'm getting 2 server disconnects in short times, it's time to make an online pause anyway.
 
Seems the system can't tell who's the Rage Quitter and who's the Victim, if someone RQ on you, you also get penalize, so 3 players RQ on you, you get banned for 2 days also..
 

VariantX

Member
Seems the system can't tell who's the Rage Quitter and who's the Victim, if someone RQ on you, you also get penalize, so 3 players RQ on you, you get banned for 2 days also..

It's almost the same problem KI had with the jail system early on in its life then... why implement the system then when all the rage quitters will do is drag you down in the hole with them?
 

Neoxon

Junior Member
Seems the system can't tell who's the Rage Quitter and who's the Victim, if someone RQ on you, you also get penalize, so 3 players RQ on you, you get banned for 2 days also..
And I think I know why. If you look closely at your profile box before each online match, you'll see two squares connected by a white squiggly line. That likely indicates a peer-to-peer connection. Because most matches are done peer-to-peer, there's no way for the server to know who rage-quit (at least right now). This may be what Capcom meant by working out the rage quitting specifics.

That said, you can get server-run matches on occasion, but they aren't common.
 

FSLink

Banned
SF 1 has : Ryu, Ken, Retsu, Geki, Joe, Mike, Lee, Gen, Birdie, Eagle, Adon, Sagat

Ryu, Ken and Birdie are already there.

So we are left with ...

Retsu
Geki
Joe
Mike
Lee
Gen
Eagle
Adon
Sagat

I think the bolded is a good mix of "known" characters and "unkown"

Adding Lee would be neat considering they seem to have redesigned him as a drunken fist fighter.
 

Fersis

It is illegal to Tag Fish in Tag Fishing Sanctuaries by law 38.36 of the GAF Wildlife Act
Is Urien releasing on August?
 

Csr

Member
And I think I know why. If you look closely at your profile box before each online match, you'll see two squares connected by a white squiggly line. That likely indicates a peer-to-peer connection. Because most matches are done peer-to-peer, there's no way for the server to know who rage-quit (at least right now). This may be what Capcom meant by working out the rage quitting specifics.

That said, you can get server-run matches on occasion, but they aren't common.

I doubt it is that simple, wasn't SFIV p2p as well?
How did they know then, i never lost points when someone else rq'ed on me, i did lose them when i had connection problems.
 

Skab

Member
But she will end up sucking as a character once again, the same thing happened for SF4 when people wanted Makoto and Ibuki to satisfy their anime needs, they both sucked and then hardly anyone played them. I hate how people vote for certain characters just because they are female and not because they actually want to play them

Yeah man we totally wanted them to satisfy our anime needs and not because we find them fun and loved them in 3rd strike.
 

GorillaJu

Member
Seems the system can't tell who's the Rage Quitter and who's the Victim, if someone RQ on you, you also get penalize, so 3 players RQ on you, you get banned for 2 days also..

Are you sure about this? Do you have evidence of this happening to you or are you just saying some shit you heard somewhere?
 
Top Bottom