BlueSparrow
Member
Even without the Pro controller this thing would cost me AU$560.
Damn dude that's a harsh price tag, the thing already is expensive, but damn. I feel for you.
Even without the Pro controller this thing would cost me AU$560.
Calling it now this thing will only sell about 500k its first month
I'd be shocked if it wasn't.Do we know for sure if it's even superior?
A lot of those "80 titles in development" are probably ports and retreads. Think about it, this was supposed to be the big blowout and the best they could muster was Skyrim, Fifa and stuff like Street Fighter 2? If they had bigger guns they were stupid to now show them now.
If they wouldn't insist that this thing is a console with a portability feature but instead claimed that it was a portable device with TV connectivity, I think the reactions could've been more positive. Other than the price and the freaking backwards online system with voice chat through a smartphone of course.
Do we have confirmation of Switch is significantly more powerful than a WiiU? Or is this a GC to Wii power jump? No game I saw looked even close to a PS4 so I know that's out the window.
Is it? Only have one system to worry about for the future and this is the lineup they have to show.
This is a more appealing WiiU to me.
Price bad.
Graphics capability bad.
Launch games bad.
Presentation bad.
Pricing of peripherals bad.
Battery life bad.
Paid online bad.
Nintendo really blew it. I still want one, but the atmosphere of disappointment is palpable.
Do we know for sure if it's even superior?
I think they realised that in order to offer robust online infrastructure like Xbox Live. They would need to charge for it.I'm a Nintendo kid. The conference was OK, paid online is hot trash for Nintendo and the price seems shit.
Made me want to put the money to a PC and re evaluate down the line.
However, no subscription for online and I'm probably day 1.
FFS Nintendo
330? Not even a 1:1 conversion as usual? It was already a hard sell at 300, but at 330 it's straight up no fucking way, this will bomb hard in europe.
Got mine preordered. That being said, i'm still unpacking the amount of disappointment I had from this event, and just how off it seemed to be.
The first thing I wanna say is I love a lot about the Switch. Again, I have it preordered; I think it has the potential to provide some incredible game experiences. I'll be getting Zelda day 1, but thats more because 'what the fuck else would I get at launch', but I do wish I had more options. Seeing all the tech in the Joy-con, and seeing them being put to use in 1 2 Switch & Arms, really pulled me in better than I thought they would. That SMO trailer solidified my purchase.
However, I just couldn't help but get this feeling watching this presentation, that the Switch was being rushed to market. We've all heard talk that this device couldn't miss the current FY Nintendo is in, that it had to launch this year no matter what, and that they delayed it into March because they wanted it to launch in a period where it had more games to show. But, clearly, the Switch just isn't in that position yet.
It feels like i'm purchasing an early access console, and no other announcement sunk that feeling in more than the paid online service would be available sometime in the late-summer/fall. They didn't even have a revenue stream service that they are clearly investing in & planning on turning into a profitable revenue stream for them to be ready by launch of the system. And does that mean that some of the features they briefly touched on for that service, like parties & voice chat, will not be available until the paid service goes online?
The other 'gut punch' for me at this presentation was just seeing so many games get announced & them not be March 3rd games. Wasn't the whole point of the Switch to consolidate development behind 1 platform for Nintendo? Wasn't the delay into March meant to be so the Switch head a healthy lineup of titles going forward from its launch date?
The device itself seems amazing, but the 'platform' it is meant to be just has me disappointed, not because the games they did announce look bad (they all looked excellent), but that I expected more games to be available around the time it launch.
You seriously just said "powned"?Zelda powned the gaming industry, thats all i need
I do have a Wii U, but I'm purchasing a switch for the superior version of Zelda plus as a future investment.
I see the Special Edition for Zelda up for preorder on Amazon, but not the Master Edition.
I agree with Price and Battery Life butThis is a more appealing WiiU to me.
Price bad.
Graphics capability bad.
Launch games bad.
Presentation bad.
Pricing of peripherals bad.
Battery life bad.
Paid online bad.
Nintendo really blew it. I still want one, but the atmosphere of disappointment is palpable.
Euro is kinda weak, especially against the dollar, but also yen.
Or you could buy the Wii U version, dump it and play it at 4k in CEMU on a medium PC instead of 900p on Switch. There's your superior version.
What kid in 2017 is 1-2 Switch supposed to entertain?JESUS.
How can you show something like this with a straight face.
Come on Nintendo. We were kids during the SNES era but now we are fucking 30!
Or you could buy the Wii U version, rip it and play it at 4k in CEMU on a medium PC instead of 900p on Switch. There's your superior version.
CEMU compatibility is hardly good enough at this point to call it the superior version of any game.Or you could buy the Wii U version, rip it and play it at 4k in CEMU on a medium PC instead of 900p on Switch. There's your superior version.
Fucking great.
Switch = AU$470
Pro controller = AU$100
Zelda = AU$90
$660.... $660 fucking hell Nintendo.
Even without the Pro controller this thing would cost me AU$560.
I don't even know how this console operates, UI, friends list, social media sharing, OS speed and features etc etc.
What kid in 2017 is 1-2 Switch supposed to entertain?
Calling it now this thing will only sell about 500k its first month
- While the launch line-up is disappointing aside from Zelda, having both Zelda & Mario on Day 1 would have eaten into one another's sales.
- The Pokémon Company likely wanted to save Stars for its own Direct later, like what happened with Sun/Moon.
This gif is going to get a lot of use in Nintendo threads in the future.
CEMU compatibility is hardly good enough at this point to call it the superior version of any game.
So rather than buying a switch you are recommending buying a PC for one game?
And considering that they managed to lose half the money that they had on their accounts since the Wii days... just wow. At least Capcom was smart when they had only 120 or so million dollars left on their account after the RE6 and DmC failures and radically changed their entire business strategy and started playing it safe... but Nintendo? It's like watching someone crashing a car against a hydrant, then buying a new car and speeding with it at 200 kmh against a wall.This is a more appealing WiiU to me.
Price bad.
Graphics capability bad.
Launch games bad.
Presentation bad.
Pricing of peripherals bad.
Battery life bad.
Paid online bad.
Nintendo really blew it. I still want one, but the atmosphere of disappointment is palpable.
So rather than buying a switch you are recommending buying a PC for one game?
I don't think it's the hardware holding it back. Zelda was developed for Wii U - the Switch version is a port of version, they are not throwing away all the stuff they have been working on for all these years. Twilight Princess was the same, both versions used identical assets.I'm disappointed overall. Zelda looks good, but I'm really disappointed that the hardware is holding back the game's art style
Its a reasonable assumption that a lot of gaffers already owns a PC and not one of them owns a Switch.
If you have money to spend, yeah. If not, you could just play it on Wii U, the difference is not that big. But yeah, I know, the portability totally deserves 330 euro.