• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Lego City Undercover Switch cover mentions 13GB download [Up3: Full game on card]

Pancake Mix

Copied someone else's pancake recipe
How is that possible when apparently the carts are expensive (hence this topic in the first place). Maybe that would explain this game being nowhere to be found in the UK for a couple of weeks now. Is it readily available elsewhere?

If that were the case, then it would just be Warner Bros. being cheap in NA and not being cheap in the EU. It's possible.

We'll find out soon.
 

nubbe

Member
(Bomberman) How is that possible when apparently the carts are expensive (hence this topic in the first place). Maybe that would explain this game being nowhere to be found in the UK for a couple of weeks now. Is it readily available elsewhere?

Different laws
EU is pro citizen
USA is pro corporate
 

Grimsen

Member
The Bomberman cover also mentions a required download and as you all know there's no such thing.

m2AyyJz.jpg

Um. It doesn't say that there is storage space required to play.
 

Pancake Mix

Copied someone else's pancake recipe
MGSV just had a steam installer. There was no gamedata on the disc.

Yes, I know and that does not negate my point, it's just more info than I needed in my post. Games can ship in the EU in a similar state as Lego City Undercover is (supposedly) in within NA.

If it's different in Europe, it's because of Warner Bros. themselves or Nintendo of Europe, not EU regulations, as MGSV shows us.
 

Dingens

Member
(Bomberman) How is that possible when apparently the carts are expensive (hence this topic in the first place). Maybe that would explain this game being nowhere to be found in the UK for a couple of weeks now. Is it readily available elsewhere?

do we actually know what expensive means in this case?
like a 20 cent module would still be more "expensive" than say a 15 cent one...

(because I somewhat doubt that these things are expensive enough to warrant a 10$ premium)
 
So a bunch of folks are saying the box was printed wrong? Hopefully that's the case? IGN said there was a "small update" on day 1 but not 13GB
 
So a bunch of folks are saying the box was printed wrong? Hopefully that's the case? IGN said there was a "small update" on day 1 but not 13GB

LOL if it was supposed to say "1.3GB install" and the "." got left out by mistake.

I really hope this is sorted out, I definitely want to play this again with smaller loading times and actually finish it. I'd get it on PS4 but I want all the special Nintendo touches too. But if there really is some fuckery afoot where the full game isn't on the cart or can't be played properly without a download that just sucks and I won't be buying it again ):
 

LordKano

Member
So a bunch of folks are saying the box was printed wrong? Hopefully that's the case? IGN said there was a "small update" on day 1 but not 13GB

Well, if IGN got the game and didn't have to download a 13GB patch/install/whatever, I think we have pretty solid evidence that there's a fuckery somewhere.
Care to share a source ?
 

Gamezone

Gold Member
So a bunch of folks are saying the box was printed wrong? Hopefully that's the case? IGN said there was a "small update" on day 1 but not 13GB

They accidentally printed Internet required along with a 13 GB typo, while the game is 13 GB smaller than the Wii U version
 

Dingens

Member
Nah... from reading this thread, it seems plausible that those 13gig are pal languages they cut from the US version to save cost on cartridges. You won't need them to play, but you still get a somewhat inferior version since they won't be able to do that with the PAL version
 
Well, if IGN got the game and didn't have to download a 13GB patch/install/whatever, I think we have pretty solid evidence that there's a fuckery somewhere.
Care to share a source ?

http://m.ign.com/articles/2017/03/28/wb-comments-on-lego-city-undercover-switch-download

"Players who purchase LEGO City: Undercover on Nintendo Switch at retail do not need to download the game to play. All players who purchase the game can download the small content update patch with an internet connection."

If small is 13gb then WB are nuts
 

Gamezone

Gold Member

LordKano

Member
What if it's 13MB and the typo is just a letter.

And because of 1.3GB you put "Internet required" on front of the boxart? Or they were able to reduce the file size by 10GB? Doubt it.

Maybe it's a Nintendo policy to add the mention if you have to download something to play the game ?
 
And because of 1.3GB you put "Internet required" on front of the boxart? Or they were able to reduce the file size by 10GB? Doubt it.

Then why the eShop thing though, that's baffling in its own right because saying it's ~8GB is disingenuous as all hell if it's ~20...
 

tuffy

Member
Then why the eShop thing though, that's baffling in its own right because saying it's ~8GB is disingenuous as all hell if it's ~20...
The space used up for things like save and extra data is likely treated separately from the download for the game itself as far as the eShop listing is concerned.

But WB's statements about a "small content update" when playing from a physical copy aren't consistent with some massive required download after purchasing it.
 

Plum

Member
And because of 1.3GB you put "Internet required" on front of the boxart? Or they were able to reduce the file size by 10GB? Doubt it.

If the patch is required to play the game then it could be 13kb and they would still put it on.

As I've said before, this is a port of a notoriously poorly-coded game 4 years after the fact from a team whose gotten a lot better at porting games. Being able to compress everything down to 7-9GB isn't exactly an impossibility, it just seems that way because blu-rays and mandatory installs have made compression a lost art. Skyrim came out on a single 7.5gb disc on the 360 and that had tons of voice, textures, etc.

That and it's not like boxarts haven't gone out with typos before. Remember Resident Evil: Revelaitons?

It might not be a typo, there may be another explanation, but now that I know how big the Xbox One and digital versions are the Switch version being 7gb+a 13gb download is becoming increasingly more far-fetched.
 
Why would that require an internet connection?
If WB wanted they could tie the game cart to a console on their servers to keep someone from just installing the game on other people's consoles for free.

Not that I think the cart is just an installer, just spitballing why an internet connection could be required by the publisher.
 
Omfg did WB use the word "game" again for IGN too? Why do they say they won't need to download the "game" when we know that already! Also what kind of wizardry is able to make the game run with only 7GB?! We need to know as if this is true then it's a good sign for third parties. Wtf is going on!

Edit: Does anyone know what the size will be on the eu eshop?
 
Top Bottom