• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Do we all agree that Nintendo is having a "soft launch" with Switch?

KrawlMan

Member
The launch lineup doesn't give me "soft launch" vibes, but the following bullets do:

- OS by all accounts, seems incomplete
- No proper online functionality
- Seemingly no other apps (Netflix, browser, etc) besides core gaming functions.

I could easily see shifts in how they move forward with these areas based on consumer feedback. It'd be nice if they were transparent about everything though.
 

trixx

Member
The launch lineup doesn't give me "soft launch" vibes, but the following bullets do:

- OS by all accounts, seems incomplete
- No proper online functionality
- Seemingly no other apps (Netflix, browser, etc) besides core gaming functions.

I could easily see shifts in how they move forward with these areas based on consumer feedback. It'd be nice if they were transparent about everything though.

Yes, the only way i see this getting better is with virtual console games, otherwise this is quite bad imo
 

sphinx

the piano man
I am bumping this 6-week.old thread to say.

ABSOLUTELY

I just went to gaming stores here in Germany and it's like Launch hasn't happened

.- no consoles (of course)
.- no merchandising,
.- barely any games (some Zelda and 12 switch copies)
.- barely any perihperals,
.- no visual advertisement, like posters,
.- no area in the store allocated to switch

I can understand the console being outsold, but the in-store landscape is pretty telling, nintendo didn't even care about sending promotional materials or.... anything.
 

ShirAhava

Plays with kids toys, in the adult gaming world
I mean if you want to call Nintendo not having their shit together a 'soft launch' I guess?
 

ramparter

Banned
Yes and no I'm not expecting a big launch, just a gradual launch over the year. I believe we will see two big os updates before the year ends.
 

10k

Banned
Yes. Absolutely.

They knew they'd sell 4m or so of these in six months to the hardcore Nintendo fans and Zelda fans.

By the time the fall arrives, the full online services will have launched, eShop will be more fleshed out, the software library will have a good number of exclusives, the kinks will be ironed out, and they can push for holiday sales with Super Mario Odyssey being the flagship title.
 

Chinbo37

Member
I was at my local "everything" store (like target and groceries).

They don't have the system (ok fine) no really switch section at all. Literally three games (zelda, 1 2 switch and just Dance) which are next to the Wii U games under a heading that says wii u games.

It's really strange actually.
 

entremet

Member
Yes. But it was a brilliant move

Better soft launch now and have a better product in the holidays. Add e3 announcements on top of that.
 

ASIS

Member
I thought I was having deja by but this really is just a bumped threading day this again. Switch's launch is a rushed launch, not a soft one. I doubt they intended a thin launch line up and incomplete IOS just to "test the waters". That makes no sense when two of the Switch's heavy hitters will be out 7 weeks after launch.
 

Kamina

Golden Boy
I'm really hoping they'll release a Virtual Console and some fitting games along with it soon. Some digital WiiU games or Zelda Alttp and Super Metroid would pick up nicely on the switch.
 
I feel like Nintendo is going to sell as many Switches as possible at the $300 price point before dropping the price. If Apple can sell a 10" iPad for only $30 more than a Switch, then I don't see why Nintendo won't be able to lower the price later this year.
 

Megatron

Member
No, because there is no such thing as a soft launch. You either launched or you didn't. Now a launch can be really well planned and prepared for, or it can come across like it was hobbled together at the last second by people who have no idea what they are doing. The Switch launch unfortunately was closer to the latter.
 

Niwa

Member
I am bumping this 6-week.old thread to say.

ABSOLUTELY

I just went to gaming stores here in Germany and it's like Launch hasn't happened

.- no consoles (of course)
.- no merchandising,
.- barely any games (some Zelda and 12 switch copies)
.- barely any perihperals,
.- no visual advertisement, like posters,
.- no area in the store allocated to switch

I can understand the console being outsold, but the in-store landscape is pretty telling, nintendo didn't even care about sending promotional materials or.... anything.

Well our local MÜLLER and SATURN have plenty promotional stuff. Differs to where you go I guess?
 

SmokedMeat

Gamer™
"Soft launch" is spin for not having your shit ready and releasing a half baked product. At least that's how it's being used with Switch. A real "soft launch" would be NES releasing in New York as a test.

Much like "launch window" is used to cover up not having enough content ready for day one.

Call it what you'd like but the Switch launch was very weak. I'm happy with my purchase, but I'm not going to sugar coat things.
 

HeeHo

Member
I'm fine with the launch. All is forgiven with one sweet ass game for me.

Something like the 360 launch bored me to tears.
 

emb

Member
I don't see any problem with a sort of soft launch. They know people are going to buy it at first just because it's there. They know Zelda's not quite an exclusive, but is a big game that they can always use as a selling point. And they know they'd have had trouble providing a full launch lineup without gimping the rest of the year.

Makes more sense to let the typical Nintendo launch buyers get in now, and let the usual holiday customers jump in around the end of the year. Zelda alone is a bit of a stretch to sell to anyone on the fence, but if Mario gets well received, system could be a strong value proposition by the end of the year (Mario + Zelda + a few other Nintendo gems). I'm hoping their plan ultimately is to bundle Zelda in, seems like that would be pretty appealing.
 

4Tran

Member
No, because there is no such thing as a soft launch. You either launched or you didn't. Now a launch can be really well planned and prepared for, or it can come across like it was hobbled together at the last second by people who have no idea what they are doing. The Switch launch unfortunately was closer to the latter.
Nah, soft launches do exist. One good example of it is a film that releases in a limited number of theaters before opening wide to the general audience.

However, soft launches are typically associated with things like a limited amount of marketing, releasing in smaller markets before hitting larger ones, and the like. This isn't the case of the Switch so it's not a soft launch; it's just a case of Nintendo not having everything in place before they launched.
 

schopaia

Member
I don't see why they couldn't have delayed it another 6-8 months to get everything ready for a big Xmas launch, they've been coasting on fumes and tiny sales numbers for the last 2 years anyway so nobody expects any kind of output for the Wii U.

I'd argue that a flat launch is far more damaging for the brand than another year with little to no market presence, they're not exactly in a situation like Sony with the PS3 where 3rd parties will keep them going until they are firing on all cylinders. Well, unless they want to resort to a 3DS style drastic price cut to get customers attention.

I'd say it all has to do with Zelda. It got a massive push last year at E3, and they couldn't sit on it for 15 months or so. Putting it out as a Wii u only game wouldn't have worked out too well - they're not even making the system any more and the last game they put out for it was 6 months ago. So instead they launch it with a new system, bolstering the Zelda brand, Switch brand, and Nintendo brand as a whoile with the grandest piece of software they've ever developed. Seeing as how BOTW has dominated the gaming discussion in a way no other nintendo game has sinc... when? Wii Sports 10 years ago? Seems like they made the right choice.
 
Putting a phrase like "Do we all agree that..." in your thread title immediately makes me think you're making a bad faith argument.
 

spekkeh

Banned
Soft launches are to slowly build up momentum, not to completely sell out across the globe, making your store shelves look like the Soviet Union during a famine. Even if it was intended as a soft launch, which I doubt, it clearly didn't turn out as one.

It's an early access launch, that at least you could say.
 
I'm not sure if having a lot of software/variety corresponds to a strong launch...

Maybe i'm defending Nintendo a bit too much here or putting too much emphasis on their own games but I would rather have a limited launch library that I can maximise the most time and enjoyment out of than a variety of games that collectively I won't enjoy as much.

The PS4 launched with a fair few games that could be played on the XB1 vice versa. But is that really what I want? Do I want to spend my time playing FIFA, CoD, Battlefield etc or engulf myself in an experience.

Okay sure, Zelda can be played on the WiiU, but if I was an outsider, I probably might enjoy having a limited library but a really great launch experience with a few selected titles.

It's hard to judge but hey...

I've always gone for the experience with Nintendo and it's never betrayed me.

I'lll be honest, I don't want this scenario at all.
 
Nah, soft launches do exist. One good example of it is a film that releases in a limited number of theaters before opening wide to the general audience.

However, soft launches are typically associated with things like a limited amount of marketing, releasing in smaller markets before hitting larger ones, and the like. This isn't the case of the Switch so it's not a soft launch; it's just a case of Nintendo not having everything in place before they launched.

Pretty much this

I almost guarantee there will be a 1-2 Switch bundle in the fall and a big marketing push.

I can't think of most anyone who couldn't guarantee this for any console tbh.
 
I always believed the console was originally intended for late 2017 based on the fact that dev kits were sent out so late. So..I do agree that this is a soft launch. This will be a completely different system by this time next year. I also think we will see some ports of the more popular Wii U games to pad out the time between big releases. I'm happy with my purchase, but I'm just hoping they don't botch the virtual console. If I purchased it on the Wii U or 3DS, at least give me a good discount on the Switch version.

Edit: reading through the thread and I see some good points about 3DS/Vita third parties. The Switch is absolutely the logical place to go. Might take a couple of years though
 

balohna

Member
I can't think of most anyone who couldn't guarantee this for any console tbh.

I guess the difference is they'll go into their first holiday with a lot of enthusiast purchases out of the way, and a line-up that's had a few months to grow. Plus all this paid beta testing :^)
 

4Tran

Member
I always believed the console was originally intended for late 2017 based on the fact that dev kits were sent out so late. So..I do agree that this is a soft launch. This will be a completely different system by this time next year. I also think we will see some ports of the more popular Wii U games to pad out the time between big releases. I'm happy with my purchase, but I'm just hoping they don't botch the virtual console. If I purchased it on the Wii U or 3DS, at least give me a good discount on the Switch version.
That's an argument for the Switch being released sooner than Nintendo had originally intended, but it's not one for it being a soft launch. Soft launches are characterized by, among other things, having a limited number of units available for sale at the beginning. 2 million units in the first month is not limited, so it's just a regular launch.
 

DonShula

Member
At this point it's irrelevant. The launch was a success and they've increased production for the next fiscal year. Whatever you want to call it, it's working so far.
 
It is pretty embarrassing that half of the store is freaking Neo Geo games.

That said Zelda is receiving both effusive and near universal praise so I don't think it matters.
 
Lol some people in this thread actually trying to argue the ps4/xb1 launched with too many games and that nintendo having less games is actually better for gamers....mind blown
 

Kebiinu

Banned
Soft launch or not, the launch was a success for Nintendo. Seems like they know what they're doing, I hope anyway.
 

SmokedMeat

Gamer™
Soft launch or not, the launch was a success for Nintendo. Seems like they know what they're doing, I hope anyway.

They have a fine piece of hardware and a great concept that's more then making up for all the shortcomings. If Switch were a standard console without the portability factor we'd probably be looking at a very different situation right now.
 
I was at my local "everything" store (like target and groceries).

They don't have the system (ok fine) no really switch section at all. Literally three games (zelda, 1 2 switch and just Dance) which are next to the Wii U games under a heading that says wii u games.

It's really strange actually.

They probably have Skylanders Imaginators too, but in the Skylanders section. That's how it is here in LA. I'm not sure why they don't put a couple of Skylanders boxes in the Switch section as well.
 

flozuki

Member
I am bumping this 6-week.old thread to say.

ABSOLUTELY

I just went to gaming stores here in Germany and it's like Launch hasn't happened

.- no consoles (of course)
.- no merchandising,
.- barely any games (some Zelda and 12 switch copies)
.- barely any perihperals,
.- no visual advertisement, like posters,
.- no area in the store allocated to switch

I can understand the console being outsold, but the in-store landscape is pretty telling, nintendo didn't even care about sending promotional materials or.... anything.

Strange, a lot of promoters in the north of Germany in the huge electronic stores...Big ads in central station hamburg for release. Since then stores are selling what they get so I guess for now no further activity needed.
 

jholmes

Member
I'd say it all has to do with Zelda. It got a massive push last year at E3, and they couldn't sit on it for 15 months or so. Putting it out as a Wii u only game wouldn't have worked out too well - they're not even making the system any more and the last game they put out for it was 6 months ago. So instead they launch it with a new system, bolstering the Zelda brand, Switch brand, and Nintendo brand as a whoile with the grandest piece of software they've ever developed.

No, see, Nintendo didn't launch the Switch as a reaction to the state of the Wii U, they started holding the Wii U back to prepare for the Switch launch. Nintendo chose to pull hardware from store shelves rather than cut the prices to get them into homes. Nintendo could've upped advertising for the Wii U and pushed Zelda hard on the system, but chose to cut the Wii U off at the knees and put that money into an early Switch launch. Whether that idea was the right one or wrong one is certainly in the eye of the beholder, but the situation was largely of Nintendo's making.
 

Animator

Member
They made the mistake of not having enough units for launch. Up until two weeks ago I was trying to find one and would have bought on the spot for zelda. Now my hype died down and I don't give a shit since there is nothing other than zelda on it that I want to play.
 

NimbusD

Member
The only way I could agree with this is the state of the is and online. We all know it's being updated later on, so we're just waiting to see what's to come in that regard.

But the games are fine, similar enough to any other launch.
 
They made the mistake of not having enough units for launch. Up until two weeks ago I was trying to find one and would have bought on the spot for zelda. Now my hype died down and I don't give a shit since there is nothing other than zelda on it that I want to play.

If the console is good, they know it's not a lost sale. You'll get one, eventually. If you had gotten one truly just because of hype and now never intend on buying one ever, you may have ended up selling it and the person buying it from you would have been a lost sale too.
 
Top Bottom