• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PC World Struggles To Build PC for $500 to match XOX

Lister

Banned
I'm not sure this has been discussed so apologies if it has. PC gaming, for me, has always been cheaper in the long run with the ability to upgrade individual parts, the fantastic deals available with the online market places, and the savings you get not having to pay for PSN/Live.

It has been discussed. It has also been dismissed as not "Fair". Also where's the UHD blu ray drive? Huh? Where is it?! My preciiiioooouuus!
 

Quotient

Member
It has been discussed. It has also been dismissed as not "Fair". Also where's the UHD blu ray drive? Huh? Where is it?! My preciiiioooouuus!

Why is it considered not "fair"?

The total cost of ownership should play an important role in someones purchase decision. It may cost $800 dollars to build a PC that is equivalent to the Xbox One, but you could make back that $300 over the course of a console generation life time in not having to pay for a Live subscription and the discounts found in steam/gog/etc sales.
 
Why is it considered not "fair"?

The total cost of ownership should play an important role in someones purchase decision. It may cost $800 dollars to build a PC that is equivalent to the Xbox One, but you could make back that $300 over the course of a console generation life time in not having to pay for a Live subscription and the discounts found in steam/gog/etc sales.

Conversely the cheapest way to play AAA titles on release is to buy physical media and sell the game upon completion. More savings for console owners.
 
It'll be impossible to match the form factor even if they did secure the right components. The Xbox One X, like a MacBook Air back in 2011, isn't going to be built with entirely off-the-shelf parts, but its engineering will be specialised in a way that they'll be able to cram all those parts into the chassis it has, while preventing the inside from getting dangerously toasty in operation.

Basically, the PC industry - particularly the self-building segment of it - isn't set up to build a box like the Xbox One X, at the price it's going for.
 

rodrigolfp

Haptic Gamepads 4 Life
Conversely the cheapest way to play AAA titles on release is to buy physical media and sell the game upon completion. More savings for console owners.

and less money for the devs. support the devs. dont buy used games. buy directly from the devs ;)
 

n0razi

Member
Do the price comparison when the system is actually for sale, not using pre-release specs.

A PC with an i3 Kaby Lake, GTX 1060, 256GB SSD, and 16GB ram will run you $600+ right now but in 6 months when the XOX actually goes on sale, those parts will be under $500
 

Lister

Banned
Basically, the PC industry - particularly the self-building segment of it - isn't set up to build a box like the Xbox One X, at the price it's going for.

Yeah, form factor would be hard to match. Although come November, new cases will be out and existing small form factor cases will be cheaper, so again, clsoer. Not sure what that has to do with gaming performance though, which is what this thread is about.

Do the price comparison when the system is actually for sale, not using pre-release specs.

A PC with an i3 Kaby Lake, GTX 1060, 256GB SSD, and 16GB ram will run you $600+ right now but in 6 months when the XOX actually goes on sale, those parts will be under $500

Yep. Said it myself a while back in the thread too. We really nee dot wait for the release of this thign to declare anything.
 

Naglafar

Member
Why is it considered not "fair"?

The total cost of ownership should play an important role in someones purchase decision. It may cost $800 dollars to build a PC that is equivalent to the Xbox One, but you could make back that $300 over the course of a console generation life time in not having to pay for a Live subscription and the discounts found in steam/gog/etc sales.

Not have to pay for Live sure, but there are a lot of Xbox sales throughout the year, and the prices are pretty, close to steam sale levels.
 

flkraven

Member
not really. can you run Quake 3 on XBOX at 500+fps with mouse+kb? again, pc is not only performance for multiplataform games...

While I don't necessarily agree with the person you are responding to, I don't understand how your post is a valid response. What does KB/Mouse have anything to do with price/performance? How does running a 20 year old game at a ridiculously high frame rate impact the price/performance of an Xbox vs a PC?
 

flkraven

Member
Do the price comparison when the system is actually for sale, not using pre-release specs.

A PC with an i3 Kaby Lake, GTX 1060, 256GB SSD, and 16GB ram will run you $600+ right now but in 6 months when the XOX actually goes on sale, those parts will be under $500

I'd be interested in seeing this build at $600. Tough to believe I could get one with the specs you listed, with board, case, license, drive, kb/mouse or controller, etc for $600.
 

CrustyBritches

Gold Member
Well since you can't play online games with an xbox and you can with a PC you should probably factor in +$240 for 4 years of Xbox live then.

And I fail to see how $50 xbone pad and Bluetooth is mandatory for a PC. If you're going to say that you get into kbm adapter territory for the Xbox and unnecessarily buying a kbm just for the Xbox.

Either way both systems come out to $700+ if you don't want to extremely limit your budget on the PC build and we include 4 years of Xbox live as you cannot play online multiplayer without it. $500 if you really limit your PC build and $500 if you don't play Xbox games online.
1. The whole point is to build a console replacement targeting 4K/30fps. This should include: Win10, mini-itx case, quality PSU, mobo, CPU, GPU, RAM, HDD, optical drive, quality KB/M or cheap KB/M and nice gamepad, and hdmi cable.
---
2. You're fluffing your build cost by: 1. Excluding Windows 2. Excluding KB/M 3. Excluding gamepad 4. $15 firehazard PSU 5. Excluding optical drive 6. Big honker ATX case 7. No HDMI cable
---
3. A baseline build estimate looks like: $40 Case, $30 PSU, $50 Mobo, $45 RAM, $45 HDD, $45 BD drive, $20 KB/M, $50 gamepad+receiver, $90 Win10, $5 hdmi.
TOTAL = $420

That leaves CPU and GPU budget of $80 for a $500 build, or $180 for a $600 build. We know GTX 1060/RX 580 run ~$250 and an i3 starts around $120. That's at least $350 even with $20 MiR.

Putting us at:
$770 for i3+GTX 1060 or RX 580
$840 for i5+GTX 1060 or RX 580
$920 for i3+GTX 1070
$990 for i5+GTX 1070

This is mini-itx. The best deal on big honker ATX case build is ASUS prebuilt for $950 with i5/GTX 1070. Let's just be honest that right now, it's about $900 to beat the X1X without accounting for UHD Blu-Ray.

Do a build list on pcpartpicker or newegg with all the requisite components and post it here I'm curious to see what you end up with.
 
and less money for the devs. support the devs. dont buy used games. buy directly from the devs ;)

Hmmm...many of the cheaper solutions for games presented here do not go to the devs. The $10 version of Windows 10, the deals from CD keys etc.

Why is it considered not "fair"?

The total cost of ownership should play an important role in someones purchase decision. It may cost $800 dollars to build a PC that is equivalent to the Xbox One, but you could make back that $300 over the course of a console generation life time in not having to pay for a Live subscription and the discounts found in steam/gog/etc sales.


There was a time last gen when a game would launch on PC and be $49.99 vs. $59.99 on console, that's not the case any longer. Many games are on sale on PS/XB digital stores before Steam - Neir Automata is a recent example - Or publishers run sales across all platforms with similar discounts.

There are deals to be had on all platforms, and w/ major retailers supporting discounts/rebates on new console games be it physical or digital it's often cheaper to get AAA games day one from the likes of Amazon or Bestbuy vs. Steam.

I don't think the "savings" of PC gaming is as great a delta as it was in years past. Assuming you're not going gray market.
 

flkraven

Member
Why is it considered not "fair"?

The total cost of ownership should play an important role in someones purchase decision. It may cost $800 dollars to build a PC that is equivalent to the Xbox One, but you could make back that $300 over the course of a console generation life time in not having to pay for a Live subscription and the discounts found in steam/gog/etc sales.

To be honest, none of these 'can you build a PC like the Xbox' threads have anything to do with being fair. We can debate all day and night about the benefits of one over the other. PCs can do other things, are more flexible, don't have to pay to game online, etc. Consoles are easier to use, don't have to fiddle with drivers, shared ecosystem/control scheme for everyone you are playing with, etc. But that ISN'T what these threads are doing.

These threads aim to answer 1 simple question: Can you match the power of an Xbox One X on a PC for $500 or less. Obviously there are benefits of one over the other, but these are very narrow comparisons. That is why you can't exclude windows license, optical drives, input device, etc because we are comparing hardware.

The cost of Xbox Live, the value of the Games with Gold games, etc are all irrelevant to this type of comparison. It's a different debate entirely.
 

rodrigolfp

Haptic Gamepads 4 Life
While I don't necessarily agree with the person you are responding to, I don't understand how your post is a valid response. What does KB/Mouse have anything to do with price/performance? How does running a 20 year old game at a ridiculously high frame rate impact the price/performance of an Xbox vs a PC?

again, because when you buy a pc, you dont buy just performance? i find funny people ignoring all the innumerous other gaming vantages besides "only performance".
 

Panajev2001a

GAF's Pleasant Genius
I'm not even a PC guy, but I'm gonna go ahead and say that the PC community will figure out a build that'll match, and even surpass the XBONEX by November.

I am the first one to point out consoles’ format benefit to consumers, but it is not fair to compare what you can build now to what Xbox One X will provide several months from now. The same kind of articles which one year out were unfairly calling PS4 Pro a disappointing half step by comparison (to a trailer of something coming a year later) are now talking down PC parts value months before the console is out (and knowing how prices fall in the PC space).
 

SapientWolf

Trucker Sexologist
The takeaway isn't that the XBX will replace a similarly priced PC. The feature sets aren't interchangeable. It's that MS actually made a decent console for the price this time around.
 

CrustyBritches

Gold Member
P.S.- Prices on the RX 480/580 and GTX 1060 have gone up since last year thanks to ethereum, they're currently sold-out, and there's no guarantee of a drop on those cards by later this year. The "can/will get for $150" people are dreaming.
 

flkraven

Member
again, because when you buy a pc, you dont buy just performance? i find funny people ignoring all the innumerous other gaming vantages besides "only performance".


If this thread was "compare the advantages of both of vs Xbox I'd agree with you" but it's not. It's "can you build a PC as powerful as an Xbox x". Cool, a PC can run excel and an Xbox cant. Has nothing to do with this thread.
 

Shpeshal Nick

aka Collingwood
Can't speak for American pricing, but in Australia, you'd have no chance of getting anywhere close to it.

The AMD 580 would be at least $400-$500. That's with an 8GB version. Not even sure a 12 exists.

The UHD Bluray drive would cost at least a couple of hundred.

So you've already passed the $649 retail price of the Xbox One X in Australia with only 2 parts.
 

coughlanio

Member
Only way to probably do it right now is with used parts. Can probably pick up an Ivy Bridge i5 system from an office surplus store for about $100 these days. Throw in a GTX 1070 as long as the PSU can handle it, and that should get you comparable real world performance.
 

coughlanio

Member
P.S.- Prices on the RX 480/580 and GTX 1060 have gone up since last year thanks to ethereum, they're currently sold-out, and there's no guarantee of a drop on those cards by later this year. The "can/will get for $150" people are dreaming.

Both are readily available here in Japan, but for MSRP, not $150.
 

Gattsu25

Banned
To be honest, none of these 'can you build a PC like the Xbox' threads have anything to do with being fair. We can debate all day and night about the benefits of one over the other. PCs can do other things, are more flexible, don't have to pay to game online, etc. Consoles are easier to use, don't have to fiddle with drivers, shared ecosystem/control scheme for everyone you are playing with, etc. But that ISN'T what these threads are doing.

These threads aim to answer 1 simple question: Can you match the power of an Xbox One X on a PC for $500 or less. Obviously there are benefits of one over the other, but these are very narrow comparisons. That is why you can't exclude windows license, optical drives, input device, etc because we are comparing hardware.

The cost of Xbox Live, the value of the Games with Gold games, etc are all irrelevant to this type of comparison. It's a different debate entirely.

Either we are comparing hardware or we are comparing hardware and software.
 

DrSlek

Member
2. You're fluffing your build cost by: 1. Excluding Windows 2. Excluding KB/M 3. Excluding gamepad 4. $15 firehazard PSU 5. Excluding optical drive 6. Big honker ATX case 7. No HDMI cable
---


Several of these points don't really matter that much or at all.

It's a safe bet that one might already have a KB/M that can be used in the build, and one might already have a gamepad. Optical drives are fast becoming obsolete, and personally I go months without using mine. An HDMI cable costs $2 and a shop up the road from me. Alternatively, one might already have several spare HDMI cables.
 
Eh, I could slap a a cheaper GTX 1070 in my PC from 2012 with a i5 2320 and get true 4K 30FPS if I really wanted it for less than £450.

Guess that'd be a unfair price comparison though?
 

shandy706

Member
Eh, I could slap a a cheaper GTX 1070 in my PC from 2012 with a i5 2320 and get true 4K 30FPS if I really wanted it for less than £450.

Guess that'd be a unfair price comparison though?

You have to build an entire system. It's the point of the thread.

We all know we can upgrade our systems...well...it would be a downgrade for me with those parts...but anyway..

Also, the target needs to be 4k/60 in games like Forza Motorsport.
 

n0razi

Member
I'd be interested in seeing this build at $600. Tough to believe I could get one with the specs you listed, with board, case, license, drive, kb/mouse or controller, etc for $600.

Here's something I threw together in about 30 seconds, its missing OS and KB/mouse but you can get a builders OS license for around $40 and KB/mouse runs $20 for a basic setup. Its already under $600 and thats without any sales/discounts (I have seen the i3 go for under $100 and the GTX 1060 for around $200 at palces like MicroCenter)

3UTpHKS.png



The point is that something like this will easily outpace the XOX and will certainly be much cheaper around November when the XOX is actually out for sale.
 

shandy706

Member
Here's something I threw together in about 30 seconds, its missing OS and KB/mouse but you can get a builders OS license for around $40 and KB/mouse runs $20 for a basic setup. Its already under $600 and thats without any sales/discounts (I have seen the i3 go for under $100 and the GTX 1060 for around $200 at palces like MicroCenter)

3UTpHKS.png



The point is that something like this will easily outpace the XOX and will certainly be much cheaper around November when the XOX is actually out for sale.

You think a 1060 (3GB?!) and an i3 will get 4k/60 on High/Ultra settings in Forza 7 at 4k?

As a PC gamer...I have my doubts, and Motorsport tends to be well optimized.

🤔
 

n0razi

Member
You think a 1060 (3GB?!) and an i3 will get 4k/60 on Ultra settings in Forza 7 at 4k?

As a PC gamer...I have my doubts, and Motorsport tends to be well optimized.

You think the XOX is running it at Ultra settings? Im sure even a Skylake Pentium ($50) will run circles around the Jaguar in the XOX
 

True Fire

Member
Barring the 1060/i3 ridiculousness^, I think you guys are seriously underrating the presentation factor. The form factor and out-of-the-box OS and effortless optimization is worthwhile to quite a lot of gamers. It's at least half the value in the $500 price tag.

Not everyone enjoys the enthusiast aspects of PC building.
 

shandy706

Member
You think the XOX is running it at Ultra settings? Im sure even a Skylake Pentium ($50) will run circles around the Jaguar in the XOX

I'm not sure your build would run it at 4k/60 locked on high/med.

It takes a 1070 to get close to 4k/60 in Forza 6...and it doesn't stay there when weather and 23 cars are on the track.
 

ss_lemonade

Member
Several of these points don't really matter that much or at all.

It's a safe bet that one might already have a KB/M that can be used in the build, and one might already have a gamepad. Optical drives are fast becoming obsolete, and personally I go months without using mine. An HDMI cable costs $2 and a shop up the road from me. Alternatively, one might already have several spare HDMI cables.
Can the same be said when people argue that one must include a TV when considering console costs? I see that a lot when the opposite side says that you must include a PC monitor, which I believe most starting from scratch wouldn't even have in the first place (unlike TVs?).

The point is that something like this will easily outpace the XOX and will certainly be much cheaper around November when the XOX is actually out for sale.
Is a 1060 really that much more capable ("easily outpace") than what's in the Xbox One X? I was under the impression that the XOX would deliver something closer to a 1070 in performance, which is quite a bit faster than the 1060.
 
I'm not sure your build would run it at 4k/60 locked on high/med.

It takes a 1070 to get close to 4k/60 in Forza 6...and it doesn't stay there when weather and 23 cars are on the track.

Agreed. People are trying so hard to make a PC for the same value but the truth is that the XBX is an amazing deal for $499, and come November people are going to see it for themselves.
 

n0razi

Member
I'm not sure your build would run it at 4k/60 locked on high/med.

It takes a 1070 to get close to 4k/60 in Forza 6...and it doesn't stay there when weather and 23 cars are on the track.

Is a 1060 really that much more capable ("easily outpace") than what's in the Xbox One X? I was under the impression that the XOX would deliver something closer to a 1070 in performance, which is quite a bit faster than the 1060.



I was under the impression that the 1060 would meet or beat the XOX but hell even a 1070 runs about $300 these days and will be closer to $250 by November and that would still be within budget.
 

Mozendo

Member
Is a 1060 really that much more capable ("easily outpace") than what's in the Xbox One X? I was under the impression that the XOX would deliver something closer to a 1070 in performance, which is quite a bit faster than the 1060.

I was under the impression it was using a 580. Is there a article/video that touches on the subject I haven't been paying attention to the specs.
 

ss_lemonade

Member
I was under the impression that the 1060 would meet or beat the XOX but hell even a 1070 runs about $300 these days and will be closer to $250 by November and that would still be within budget.

I haven't been following these new GPUs recently but are there newer GPUs coming out at the end of the year that would cause something like a 1070 to drop that low? A 1070 for 250 sounds like insane value
 

Kssio_Aug

Member
I was under the impression it was using a 580. Is there a article/video that touches on the subject I haven't been paying attention to the specs.

They're probably talking about this article:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/d...pio-is-console-hardware-pushed-to-a-new-level

From what I've seen so far, there is some evidence that Scorpio's true 4K performance could pose a challenge to the likes of Nvidia's GTX 1070 and AMD's Fury X-class hardware. I've seen Microsoft's new console running a Forza Motorsport 6-level experience locked to 4K60 on the equivalent to PC's ultra settings - cranking up the quality presets to obscene levels was one of the first things developer Turn 10 did when confronted with the sheer amount of headroom it had left after a straight Xbox One port. Out of interest, we tested Forza 6 Apex with similar settings at 4K on GTX 1060, 1070 and 1080. Frames were dropped on GTX 1060 (and a lot of them when wet weather conditions kicked in), while GTX 1070 held firm with only the most intense wet weather conditions causing performance dips. Only GTX 1080 held completely solid in all test cases. It's only one data point, and the extent to which the code is comparable at all is debatable, but it certainly doesn't harm Scorpio's credentials: Forza 6 Apex received plenty of praise for the quality of its PC port.

The bottom line: PC games need to evolve to more efficiently address 4K, in order to bring down the cost of GPU hardware to effectively and consistently power an ultra HD screen with the latest games. The best console titles have led the way here, and it's a tradition we expect to see continue on Project Scorpio. If third-party games live up to the first-party results we have seen, where 900p and 1080p games scale up to native 4K, the comparisons with PC hardware will prove absolutely fascinating. If Scorpio's GPU can hold native 4K and hand in results on par or better than GTX 1070, this is a seriously good result for a console.

I would wait before any further conclusion though. If Xbox One X indeed is as good as an GTX 1070 set up that's gonna be pretty amazing, but we will see.
 

JaggedSac

Member
I was under the impression that the 1060 would meet or beat the XOX but hell even a 1070 runs about $300 these days and will be closer to $250 by November and that would still be within budget.

Is 3gb of video mem enough for 4k textures? What do 4k games generally use these days?
 

Mozendo

Member
They're probably talking about this article:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/d...pio-is-console-hardware-pushed-to-a-new-level



I would wait before any further conclusion though. If Xbox One X indeed is as good as an GTX 1070 set up that's gonna be pretty amazing, but we will see.

Are we sure it's native 4k and not checkerboard-ed? I was planning on getting a base model after the X launched due to price drops but I might go the X instead.

Wonder if this will affect BC games if they don't already get constant 60 frames.
 

clem84

Gold Member
"That might be a first"

??? Are they nuts? Don't consoles always have the upperhand dollar for dollar?
 

flkraven

Member
Here's something I threw together in about 30 seconds, its missing OS and KB/mouse but you can get a builders OS license for around $40 and KB/mouse runs $20 for a basic setup. Its already under $600 and thats without any sales/discounts (I have seen the i3 go for under $100 and the GTX 1060 for around $200 at palces like MicroCenter)

3UTpHKS.png



The point is that something like this will easily outpace the XOX and will certainly be much cheaper around November when the XOX is actually out for sale.

This build is over $500, missing a harddrive, optical drive, windows license and input device (kB/mouse or controller). On top of that many argue it isn't as powerful. Also it needs to be built. So what did this prove?
 

Alebrije

Member
So why Phil said Microsoft is not selling at lost XboneX? Unless Microsoft got big deals from suppliers for the parts. Even then it seems would not be a profitable console just as hardware.
 

K.Jack

Knowledge is power, guard it well
So why Phil said Microsoft is not selling at lost XboneX? Unless Microsoft got big deals from suppliers for the parts. Even then it seems would not be a profitable console just as hardware.

He didn't say they aren't selling it at a loss, though. This is the full quote:

"No," Xbox leader Phil Spencer told me in an interview this week, after I asked him if Microsoft makes any money selling the Xbox One X at $500.

"So, you're taking a loss?" I said. "I didn't answer it that way," he responded, intentionally not offering more detail.

"I don't want to get into all the numbers, but in aggregate you should think about the hardware part of the console business is not the money-making part of the business. The money-making part is in selling games."


He completely avoided saying whether they are taking a loss. Why wouldn't he have just answered with a"no", if they are breaking even?

"I didn't answer it that way" does not scream "we aren't taking a loss".
 
Top Bottom