Explain why, please. I'm not being obtuse - I want to know whether you mean graphically, stylistically, or whether it's just a game you think you don't want to play on a mechanical level.
Based on that video, it looks and sounds outdated. None of what that shows appeals to me whatsoever, and redoing stages over and over to get a 'perfect run' is not something I will remotely enjoy. I might not even bother downloading it.
If a big fan of it describes it as frustrating but rewarding, then I can safely assume it's not a game for me. Not to mention the negative opinions it's gotten in this topic.
How do you come to the conclusion that they're 'skimping' on it? And why are you ignoring the fact that half the time you are getting games that probably outvalue the 'wasted' £5 during the remainder of the year?
You know what you are signing up for when you pay for PS+. You do not always get what you want. You sometimes get things that are perfect and you are delighted with, and sometimes you get things that surprise you or disappoint you.
That's the way it is and I see no valid reasoning for the kind of downtrodden hyperbole that some are echoing.
I say they're skimping on it because the value of next month's games is low, particularly on the Vita side of things. JSR is £6.50 and Pinball Arcade is £8. Bringing it to a grand total of £14.50. Comparatively, this month we have MK, which retails at about £14, Big Sky is £8 and Knytt is £10. Next month is straight up poor in comparison.