• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

God of War: Ascension reviews

RoboPlato

I'd be in the dick
That sucks.

Every game of this kind where there's orb collecting and upgrades should have full NG+ and design the harder modes with it in mind.

Agreed. Even if it doesn't give me everything from the very beginning at least let me keep the upgrades when I get the item in the normal progression.
 
You also have a problem with the trophy name?

Okay.

I wasn't specifically talking about the trophy so much as his other observations, but yeah, I'm with him on this one. It's important to make the distinction that it's not the trophy name alone that's the problem, it's the trophy name in conjunction with the act you've just committed. As Sessler says, it's "borderline" in the first instance, and to then turn it into a cheap frathouse gag is enormously crass. It made me cringe, and I'd be utterly embarrassed to show it to any of my family.
 

Darkmakaimura

Can You Imagine What SureAI Is Going To Do With Garfield?
I wasn't specifically talking about the trophy so much as his other observations, but yeah, I'm with him on this one. It's important to make the distinction that it's not the trophy name alone that's the problem, it's the trophy name in conjunction with the act you've just committed. As Sessler says, it's "borderline" in the first instance, and to then turn it into a cheap frathouse gag is enormously crass. It made me cringe, and I'd be utterly embarrassed to show it to any of my family.
Yeah, he said it's probably the most disturbing or gruesome thing he's seen in the series so far and that was before the Trophy popped up. Is this like American History X curb-stomp cringe worthy because it seems some are making it out to be that way.
 

Manu

Member
Yeah, he said it's probably the most disturbing or gruesome thing he's seen in the series so far and that was before the Trophy popped up. Is this like American History X curb-stomp cringe worthy?

By the looks of it is similar to what you do to
Hercules
in 3.
 

JCizzle

Member
I wasn't specifically talking about the trophy so much as his other observations, but yeah, I'm with him on this one. It's important to make the distinction that it's not the trophy name alone that's the problem, it's the trophy name in conjunction with the act you've just committed. As Sessler says, it's "borderline" in the first instance, and to then turn it into a cheap frathouse gag is enormously crass. It made me cringe, and I'd be utterly embarrassed to show it to any of my family.

Would you show your family the sex scene from GOW3? Or the parts where you tear people apart limb by limb?
 
I find it funny how it's men as apposed to women that are so up in arms about a 3 word trophy title. It's ridiculous to get so upset over some silly joke, but to subtract a point in a game review over a trophy title is crazy.
 

HoJu

Member
I find it funny how it's men as apposed to women that are so up in arms about a 3 word trophy title. It's ridiculous to get so upset over something people say as a joke, but to subtract a point in a game review over a trophy title is crazy.
How do you know that he "subtracted" a point because of that? Overall, he didn't seem too impressed with the game.
 

libregkd

Member
How do you know that he "subtracted" a point because of that? Overall, he didn't seem too impressed with the game.
I don't know if he actually did or not but it apparently bothered him enough to place it under the list of cons for the game. You usually place things that subtracted from the game experience there.
 
Would you show your family the sex scene from GOW3? Or the parts where you tear people apart limb by limb?

Well, no, but the point I'm making is that the violence on its own is less problematic - it's excessive, but it reflects the brutality of the mythology. If I was playing God of War III of an evening, say, and my wife was in the room I'm sure she'd comment on how violent it was, but those elements on their own aren't as bad.

Essentially that Trophy in that context is the game saying: "hey, you just beat a woman to death, but it's okay because bros before hoes! Up high, dawg!"

It treats a nasty, shocking act of violence as a joke. If you can't see why some people might consider that a little much, then that's kind of troubling.
 
Goddamnit - 78 on metacritic, never thought I'd see the day, SSM.

I'm still buying, and I'm still buying not doubt, but man, this is the mighty Santa Monica Studio here, what could have possibly happened here? Guess I'll find out.
 

TheHater

Member
Some of you people act like Ancient Greece was all flowers and sunshine. I guess you guys watched Disney Hercules one too many times. Please get educated on Ancient Greece and Rome before commenting on a game that reflect that brutality of a ancient civilization.
 

JCizzle

Member
Well, no, but the point I'm making is that the violence on its own is less problematic - it's excessive, but it reflects the brutality of the mythology. If I was playing God of War III of an evening, say, and my wife was in the room I'm sure she'd comment on how violent it was, but those elements on their own aren't as bad.

Essentially that Trophy in that context is the game saying: "hey, you just beat a woman to death, but it's okay because bros before hoes! Up high, dawg!"

It treats a nasty, shocking act of violence as a joke. If you can't see why some people might consider that a little much, then that's kind of troubling.

I can certainly understand it in isolation of everything else, but in the context of this particular game I don't have much trouble with it. Just like I didn't have a problem with most of Bulletstorm, for example, when the entire game was pretty offensive. I don't judge a game like GOW the same I would seeing a trophy like this in a game like Uncharted. If you don't know that the game is going to be overly vulgar and violent, then you probably haven't played GOW before.
 
Getting the game because of the multiplayer, I understand people being fixated on the single player part and considering it kind of pointless (Prequels always have that stigma), I also understand those offended with the trophy, however this is a violent game, in context the violence should make sense with Greek Mythology, I haven't played the game so I can't tell. However I do think that maybe the discussion could be better served if the focus is that GOWA is extremely violent and the violence in video games, Kratos does brutal stuff in all the games, but he's a equally ruthless against man/beast/everything, so it doesn't seem out of place to me, from what I can see.
 
Some of you people act like Ancient Greece was all flowers and sunshine. I guess you guys watched Disney Hercules one too many times. Please get educated on Ancient Greece and Rome before commenting on a game that reflect that brutality of a ancient civilization.

lol come on, man. Homeric myth has some completely comic book moments of violence, they're in no way intended to be historically accurate - it's melodrama.

Violence being the only tiny filament that connects these games to Homer's rendition of Greece, they are similarly intended to be over the top - take it as such, don't mistake it as an attempt to be "historically accurate."
 
Well, no, but the point I'm making is that the violence on its own is less problematic - it's excessive, but it reflects the brutality of the mythology. If I was playing God of War III of an evening, say, and my wife was in the room I'm sure she'd comment on how violent it was, but those elements on their own aren't as bad.

Essentially that Trophy in that context is the game saying: "hey, you just beat a woman to death, but it's okay because bros before hoes! Up high, dawg!"

It treats a nasty, shocking act of violence as a joke. If you can't see why some people might consider that a little much, then that's kind of troubling.

Troubling to who? You? Ok.

And what about the other trophies in the series treating "shocking acts of violence" as a joke? The series has always toyed with murder and sex, so it's strange to me to see people making a big deal out of it now when they had no issue with any of it in the past.
 

Jigolo

Member
Forgot the game came with TLoU demo. Now I really can't wait to get it next week.

500
 
Sweet Jesus. Sessler didn't lower the game score because of the trophy. He just said he thought the trophy was tasteless partnered with the action that unlocked it, and he clearly had a lot of other problems with the game that ended with it getting an "average" score. I personally do think it's notable that this complaint is coming from a guy who has, on numerous occasions, defended against attacks on video games regarding content and has openly stated he enjoys the "naughtiness" of the GoW series. At this point I'd say Sessler's demonstrated enough integrity and transparency to have the situation given some thought. Before anyone jumps on me, I'm not saying he's right, I'm just saying his opinion is notable.

It's fine to disagree, but losing your minds over a reviewer making a simple complaint seems silly. There's so much belittling and superfluous ":lol :lol :lol" going around, the discussion is borderline unreadable. I don't normally pay close attention to these review threads, so maybe this is all just par for the course.
 
So I just watched Sessler's review and found out about the Bros Before Hos trophy. While I'm not offended or anything, that trophy name just seems sooooooo immature and unnecessary.
 
Sweet Jesus. Sessler didn't lower the game score because of the trophy. He just said he thought the trophy was tasteless partnered with the action that unlocked it, and he clearly had a lot of other problems with the game that ended with it getting an "average" score. I personally do think it's notable that this complaint is coming from a guy who has, on numerous occasions, defended against attacks on video games regarding content and has openly stated he enjoys the "naughtiness" of the GoW series. At this point I'd say Sessler's demonstrated enough integrity and transparency to have the situation given some thought. Before anyone jumps on me, I'm not saying he's right, I'm just saying his opinion is notable.

It's fine to disagree, but losing your minds over a reviewer making a simple complaint seems silly. There's so much belittling and superfluous ":lol :lol :lol" going around, the discussion is borderline unreadable. I don't normally pay close attention to these review threads, so maybe this is all just par for the course.

Just be lucky you missed Uncharted 3's 8/10 Carnival of Stupid
 
Watch as the same people who are outraged by the trophy have no problem with GTAV. I doubt they had problems with the "Dastardly" trophy in RDR either.
 
Sweet Jesus. Sessler didn't lower the game score because of the trophy. He just said he thought the trophy was tasteless partnered with the action that unlocked it, and he clearly had a lot of other problems with the game that ended with it getting an "average" score. I personally do think it's notable that this complaint is coming from a guy who has, on numerous occasions, defended against attacks on video games regarding content and has openly stated he enjoys the "naughtiness" of the GoW series. At this point I'd say Sessler's demonstrated enough integrity and transparency to have the situation given some thought. Before anyone jumps on me, I'm not saying he's right, I'm just saying his opinion is notable.

It's fine to disagree, but losing your minds over a reviewer making a simple complaint seems silly. There's so much belittling and superfluous ":lol :lol :lol" going around, the discussion is borderline unreadable. I don't normally pay close attention to these review threads, so maybe this is all just par for the course.

I think you will find that it's the reverse - the reviewer lost his mind over a trophy name. A trophy name!
 

nib95

Banned
Here it is for any lurkers still wondering

b1zm8wM.jpg


A trophy name as a dislike is a joke.

Sesslar is my fave game journalist, and as much as I love GOW, I feel confident in his complaints. I've felt a bit iffy on this one from the start. A lot of the decisions didn't go down well with me, from it being a prelude, to it not matching GOW3s spectacle, to not having alternative weapons, to a messier camera system and to the over focus on multiplayer. And you know what, Bros before Hos? Really... Come on now. Imo it does take it too close to that dumb frat esque humour Adam speaks of. Come on now Santa Monica. Also Todd Papp, good effort, but sounds like it's fallen short.
 

GraveRobberX

Platinum Trophy: Learned to Shit While Upright Again.
Quick ? to those have retail copies

Do you get a voucher for PSASBR Character Codes or is it "Disc Benefits"?

Do you realize if Sony allowed it, Insomniac's R&C would have racy euphemisms out of their ass (some still do =D)

All 4 One was at one time could have been called Bros before Foes

So yeah!
 

beast786

Member
Well, no, but the point I'm making is that the violence on its own is less problematic - it's excessive, but it reflects the brutality of the mythology. If I was playing God of War III of an evening, say, and my wife was in the room I'm sure she'd comment on how violent it was, but those elements on their own aren't as bad.

Essentially that Trophy in that context is the game saying: "hey, you just beat a woman to death, but it's okay because bros before hoes! Up high, dawg!"

It treats a nasty, shocking act of violence as a joke. If you can't see why some people might consider that a little much, then that's kind of troubling.

Wait, who the hell takes God of War violence against mythological demigod SERIOUSLY?

it is a Joke. If it didnt then all of us would feel like mass murderes .
 

Robot Pants

Member
Some of you people act like Ancient Greece was all flowers and sunshine. I guess you guys watched Disney Hercules one too many times. Please get educated on Ancient Greece and Rome before commenting on a game that reflect that brutality of a ancient civilization.
Cemented that junior status permanently.
 
I think you will find that it's the reverse - the reviewer lost his mind over a trophy name. A trophy name!

Yep.

Watch as the same people who are outraged by the trophy have no problem with GTAV. I doubt they had problems with the "Dastardly" trophy in RDR either.

And because of Sessler making a big deal out of it, people are following suit. Suddenly, people who had no issue with any number of instances making jokes about violence in games are jumping on their high horses. If Sessler hadn't mentioned it, I doubt we'd ever have this discussion about the trophy (well, maybe, I guess -- but likely from those who were offended by stuff like that in the past).

Be consistent, people.
 
It can't be as bad as the Gerstmann reviews of the last 2 console Zelda games.

If there's a 7-8/10 for "Naughty God's latest magnum opus", there will be plenty of foolishness about.

Reading a lot of the reviews, besides the recurring theme of "been there, done that", the first half of the game gets criticized a bit, outside a big opening set piece, it's all kinda by the numbers. Funny, I felt similarly about GoW3, which after it's epic opening of all openings, felt the game just kinda settled into a meandering groove until that great Hades fight.
 

HoJu

Member
I think you will find that it's the reverse - the reviewer lost his mind over a trophy name. A trophy name!

So do you disagree with his reasoning as to why the trophy's name and context is cheap?
Not agreeing with Sessler's opinion is fine, but responding to it by just saying how he shouldn't be outraged in the first place is an ineffectual stance.
 

gioGAF

Member
Reviews seem kind of low. I wonder if this is a case of series fatigue, haters hating or if the game is truly not where it should be. I'm really looking forward to playing the game.

However, I firmly believe that the addition of multiplayer to any single player game can do nothing but damage the single player experience. Resources HAVE to be committed to multiplayer, resources that could have been put into the single player game if there was no multiplayer.

There better not be any online trophies! I HATE them!
 

beast786

Member
So do you disagree with his reasoning as to why the trophy's name and context is cheap?
Not agreeing with Sessler's opinion is fine, but responding to it by just saying how he shouldn't be outraged in the first place is an ineffectual stance.

Because that is not exception but has been the rule in god of war series

kratos_headr2ild.gif


tumblr_lr4p3yB4mp1qdpdzzo1_500.gif


tumblr_lyylswdZ1A1qdc8j6o1_500.gif


What part of this is NOT cheap?
 

Mifune

Mehmber
So do you disagree with his reasoning as to why the trophy's name and context is cheap?
Not agreeing with Sessler's opinion is fine, but responding to it by just saying how he shouldn't be outraged in the first place is an ineffectual stance.

I think the name is stupid, juvenile, and eyeroll worthy. On its face I don't understand the outrage though. I'll have to see if context makes it more objectionable, not that I particularly care if a handful of people find a dumb name offensive.
 

RoboPlato

I'd be in the dick
OT subtitle needs to be Kratos Before Hoes.


Also someone needs to .gif the Poseidon double eye gouge.

And the Hercules face tenderizing. That one got me.

I think the name is stupid, juvenile, and eyeroll worthy. On its face I don't understand the outrage though. I'll have to see if context makes it more objectionable, not that I particularly care if a handful of people find a dumb name offensive.

Eyeroll-worthy is what it seems to me. I just find it hard to comprehend the sheer anger it evoked in Sessler.
 
If there's a 7-8/10 for "Naughty God's latest magnum opus", there will be plenty of foolishness about.

Reading a lot of the reviews, besides the recurring theme of "been there, done that", the first half of the game gets criticized a bit, outside a big opening set piece, it's all kinda by the numbers. Funny, I felt similarly about GoW3, which after it's epic opening of all openings, felt the game just kinda settled into a meandering groove until that great Hades fight.

Didn't Zelda:TP get 8.8? So, not really 7-8/10.


So do you disagree with his reasoning as to why the trophy's name and context is cheap?
Not agreeing with Sessler's opinion is fine, but responding to it by just saying how he shouldn't be outraged in the first place is an ineffectual stance.

I'm indifferent to it to be honest. He did give the game a 3/5 and the only noteworthy dislike that he had was the trophy name. He sort of back-pedalled and quickly scrapped together some nonsensical negatives afterwards but it says a lot. Let's also not forget his Sly 4 review. 2/5 for being more Sly? Yeah....
 
Reviews seem kind of low. I wonder if this is a case of series fatigue, haters hating or if the game is truly not where it should be. I'm really looking forward to playing the game.

However, I firmly believe that the addition of multiplayer to any single player game can do nothing but damage the single player experience. Resources HAVE to be committed to multiplayer, resources that could have been put into the single player game if there was no multiplayer.

There better not be any online trophies! I HATE them!

Addition of MP can do nothing but damage the single player experience? Ever heard of a small game called Uncharted 2?

As for the fatigue point, should that really be a reason to dock points from a game? If yes, why isn't that rule applied to the yearly sports franchise, the 2D Marios or the CoDs?
 

Endo Punk

Member
Kratos alway seems to rustle peoples jimmies with his actions. I still love him though, one of the most colourful characters Sony produced. From what I hear SSM has succeeded in making Kratos more human so I can't wait to see how the story unfolds but definitely will be playing on hard for added challenge.
 
Top Bottom