• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

TRUTHFACT: MS having eSRAM yield problems on Xbox One

Status
Not open for further replies.
I kinda laugh at this notion.

It's extremely unlikely. In your scenario, unless they'd get every third-party to agree (impossible, basically) to gimp their software, any number of third-parties that didn't agree to such a conspiracy would make the ones that did agree look utterly incompetent by comparison. No developer will want to look incompetent. There's a lot of professional pride. Plus, as a developer, your ability to get that next job is often built on the perceived quality/reception of the last games you worked on. So developers have an incentive to do their best.
It would be the publisher that hands down that decree.
 

Into

Member
The realistic scenario reading through this entire read, is that the Xbone would be supply constrained at the start of this gen, if they launch in 2013, which lets face it, they will no matter what. And that it will be even more behind the PS4 in power than originally anticipated
 

MogCakes

Member
Too reasonable and non console warriorish? :p

Say whatever you want, I have every right to my opinion.

They also believe ESRAM is going to be a bigger payoff than what people are believing right now, which is largely why I've been stressing the ESRAM in other threads, but mostly avoiding using stuff I've heard on my own, because I can't exactly say where I got it from nor prove it to anyone, but instead mostly using posts from Beyond3D to support my suggestions and belief that ESRAM will be a design win for the Xbox One.

Manufacturing issues are real. A downclock is something that the individual is not aware of, and doesn't believe is true.
So is it sourced info or are you bullshitting? You have yet to clarify. I will continue to ask this until you answer.
 

Valnen

Member
My very first post on this forum was one saying that it doesn't matter if the PS4 is a stronger console than the Xbox One, and said more or less exactly what I said here, albeit in a longer way.

It does matter though. It affects games development. That really isn't a matter of opinion.
 

Rashid

Banned
What's worrying for me is that the xbone has very similar components to the ps4 and it's ridiculously large, and still has heating issues. The ps4 is even more powerful and runs at a higher clock rate, that either means the ps4 well also be a similar size or have a smaller, louder fan to reduce the size.

And I bet those rumours of some games potentially having to run at 60fps on ps4 and 30fps on xbone are false. The ps4 isn't that much powerful, I bet the xbone will just Lee the resolution from 1080p to like 960p or use less post processing to get it to 60fps.
 

scsa

Member
Sony had cell yield problems with the ps3, and coupled with the money in the r&d , that affected profitability majorly.

If these rumors are true, Microsoft, you have a major issue that is going to cost you a lot.

P.S. Learn from Sony and ps3, that launch should be a business study of what not to do, and seems MS copied all of what not to do into their what to do.
 

Klocker

Member
So is it sourced info or are you bullshitting? You have yet to clarify.
you are confusing his comments. His opinion was how he felt about other things people are attacking him for...

His comment on this rumor was always based on a source... Go back to the beginning and read it all again.
 
They did this gen, why wouldn't they next gen? My hope is that the power difference will be substantial enough for developers to refuse to level the playing field, but that just seems like wishful thinking.

You cant be serious. A bit of a difference when its two radically different architectures.
 
I really hope this doesn't end up impacting PS4 and PC graphics quality.

Disappointing news all around even if you never planned on buying a nextbox.
 
What's worrying for me is that the xbone has very similar components to the ps4 and it's ridiculously large, and still has heating issues. The ps4 is even more powerful and runs at a higher clock rate, that either means the ps4 well also be a similar size or have a smaller, louder fan to reduce the size.

And I bet those rumours of some games potentially having to run at 60fps on ps4 and 30fps on xbone are false. The ps4 isn't that much powerful, I bet the xbone will just Lee the resolution from 1080p to like 960p or use less post processing to get it to 60fps.

Even before this new rumor, just comparing relative GPUs available on the market showed a doubling of frame rates was possible. Add today's "news" and you may seriously want to recant.
 
It would be the publisher that hands down that decree.

Considering those same publishers gladly let certain versions of games this gen run better or worse than others, and especially back in the ps2/xbox1 days where you had stuff where the ps2 version would do 480p and the Xbox version would have a better framerate at 720p, I find the idea that MS could pay publishers to actively tone down their own products utterly outlandish.
 
You are comparing PC flops 1:1 to console flops. We already had multiple developers confirm that it doesn´t work that way,e.g. the Metro guys and John Carmack.
A closed environment hardware produces much better results than a PC with similar specs.

Like I said they will raise the baseline of development, but aside from just bare ports they should run at parity with hardware on shelves already, and better than within the first year. Both XOne and PS4 are already using hardware very similar to PC hardware, but weaker. Top end GPU's alone already have the processing power of the entirety of the PS4. By the end of this year multiples of that and next year more still.
 

MogCakes

Member
you are confusing his comments. His opinion was how he felt about other things people are attacking him for...

His comment on this rumor was always based on a source... Go back to the beginning and read it all again.

Would be nice if he clarified it so that there's no confusion. He didn't say anything about 'other people attacking him' when he said that line.

Say whatever you want, I have every right to my opinion. Am I too positive about the Xbox One for your liking? Sorry, next time I'll be sure to clear all my thoughts with you first.

I don't care if you don't believe me. Surprise! I understand that you don't like any positive in your xbox one negative news, but it is what it is lol.

was a response to

M°°nblade;61343789 said:
Sorry but I don't believe you.

The last couple of months you've been defending the Xbone at every instance. You even went as far as fighting mathematics by stating the 50% higher flops percentage was misleading and should only be 33%.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=53870013&highlight=#post53870013

And then, when we thought you finally agreed, you fought maths again in this thread a month later ...
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=562401&page=7


I'm not trying to be a jerk here but if you don't have an actual source and just use the 'I bet my account on it' to get some extra weight in the discussion, this is the time to be honest about it. You seem to be the only contradicting third hand source.
You don't literally have to defend the console to your grave.

After this exchange he began saying he has a source:
Nobody else on this site outs who their sources are. And clearly I'm in no position to say who their sources are, or how they come by that information, but I've heard from a very reliable individual whom I trust completely, and that individual has said both that this is not true, and that they have heard no such thing. I place extra weight on the person saying it, more so than what I might hear from any site, or even from typically reliable posters on this forum, because it is my firm belief that if this person doesn't know what's going on, then shit has truly hit the fan.

People can take that for what it's worth. If a mod deems it necessary to ask me why I'm so sure, I'm more than happy to tell them why, on the grounds that it remains confidential, of course.

Manufacturing issues are real. A downclock is something that the individual is not aware of, and doesn't believe is true.
 
It really does seem like this is Sony's generation to lose.

...but it's Sony!

what is that suppose to mean, you do know they have two of the highest selling consoles of all time, and the PS3 has surpassed the 360 in world wide total shipments

they are not launching under any of the disadvantages they had to overcome this gen and that knowing that they did overcome those disadvantages, this is Sony Sony's gen to lose, period.
 

kitch9

Banned
What's worrying for me is that the xbone has very similar components to the ps4 and it's ridiculously large, and still has heating issues. The ps4 is even more powerful and runs at a higher clock rate, that either means the ps4 well also be a similar size or have a smaller, louder fan to reduce the size.

And I bet those rumours of some games potentially having to run at 60fps on ps4 and 30fps on xbone are false. The ps4 isn't that much powerful, I bet the xbone will just Lee the resolution from 1080p to like 960p or use less post processing to get it to 60fps.

Dude, if the rumors turn out to be true the Xbox and PS4 aren't even going to be in the same ballpark when it comes to power.

Saying that I fully expect Sony to start waffling on about Suns and crabs with massive damage which all have to get another job to even touch their machine to cock up their momentum, but that's Sony. That shit must be coming at some point.
 

Into

Member
If this is indeed true then MS doesn't have to say a single word.

every multi platform game basically will have 2x framerate on PS4, unless MS ask developers specifically gimp PS4 version. Gamers will notice right away.


That is not happening, what leverage does MS have to make such demands? PS3 multiplatform versions ran worse and sometimes looked worse because the 360 was the lead platform and PS3 was notoriously difficult to develop for, developers got a 800 page guide to develop games on the PS3 written in Japanese thrown on their desks, while the 360 had the familiar, 20-year old architecture.

Third parties gain nothing from appeasing MS, why would they even entertain this idea? Their business is about making the best games, selling the most copies by pushing their developers to do their best, not artificially limiting them to help some other company for no other reason than...i dont know, good will?
 

Klocker

Member
Would be nice if he clarified it so that there's no confusion. He didn't say anything about 'other people attacking him' when he said that line.



was a response to
yes in response to being told that he's too pro Xbox... And he said... That's my opinion to be excited for Xbox... He then wrote a post after that clearly defining a source and the source's info and offered to confer with a mod on the source... I'm posting on my phone so pita to dig it up but go back a page
 

guek

Banned
I wouldn't bet on that.

I think much of this is blown (a bit) out of proportion. Ultimately you're going to build your success on the mainstream and frankly I could see Xbone be more appealing to them, no matter how loud people scream about the uselessness of its "non-gaming" features. Of course much will depend on the price.

The philosophy behind the xb1 seems to be trying to make consumers want a product rather than making a product you know consumers want. It's inherently difficult to accurately predict how well something like the xb1 will do because I don't think we've really seen anything quite like it before.

Of course there are many factors surrounding success other than specs. Marketing, price, manufacturing, etc., are all things that can potentially make or break MS and Sony. Sony is playing their cards safer in terms of design but it just seems much more sensible than the choices MS has made. Of course only time will tell, and all our expectations could potentially be turned upside down in less than a week.
 
Considering those same publishers gladly let certain versions of games this gen run better or worse than others, and especially back in the ps2/xbox1 days where you had stuff where the ps2 version would do 480p and the Xbox version would have a better framerate at 720p, I find the idea that MS could pay publishers to actively tone down their own products utterly outlandish.
I absolutely agree.

But such a suggestion would come from publisher, not the developer. As per the comment I quoted.
 
Man, I love this. New 'insider' pops up, seems very level-headed. Gaffer points to strong bias in 'insider''s post history, said 'insider''s facade cracks a little, starts getting a little personal.


Well, whatever the case is, I hope for the sake of multiplatform games, it's not true.
 

TheD

The Detective
Too reasonable and non console warriorish? :p I'll say it again, I think the One's specs are fine as they are. I don't look at them and think developers are being handed a weak console. Sure, weak by high end pc standards, maybe but not as it concerns an upgrade from the Xbox 360. I plan on owning the PS4, and have said so many times, so maybe I just don't see it the way that some of you do.

But, rest assured, I'm not changing my view to conform to however you guys think I should talk. My very first post on this forum was one saying that it doesn't matter if the PS4 is a stronger console than the Xbox One, and said more or less exactly what I said here, albeit in a longer way.

No, that is not at all reasonable.

Nearly anything is powerful enough to make what would be termed an "incredible game"!

You can not claim that a system is powerful without taking into account how it matches up to it's peers like the PS4!

People believe that the XB1 has at most 2/3rds the GPU power of the PS4 (at least before the info in this thread) based off the leaked specs of the systems (that seem to be turning out true), if you do not think what has been shown by the leaked specs conforms to a GPU that is 2/3rds as powerful at best then you should remove your self from posting in threads like this due to your lack of logic and understanding of computer hardware.
 

RoboPlato

I'd be in the dick
Man, there's a lot of writing on the wall for the console needing a delay but I know there's no way that MS will do it.

This could also mean that games will look better at E3 than they will at launch.
 

Nikodemos

Member
and the PS3 has surpassed the 360 in world wide total shipments.
According to relatively recent sales numbers, they're currently neck-and-neck. Though, given the PS3's gargantuan starting handicaps (a year late and a whole lot of dollars short) that's still highly impressive.
 
Man, I love this. New 'insider' pops up, seems very level-headed. Gaffer points to strong bias in 'insider''s post history, said 'insider''s facade cracks a little, starts getting a little personal.


Well, whatever the case is, I hope for the sake of multiplatform games, it's not true.

He's not new and has no history of being an insider. What he does have a history of is being pointed out.
 

MogCakes

Member
yes in response to being told that he's too pro Xbox... And he said... That's my opinion to be excited for Xbox... He then wrote a post after that clearly defining a source and the source's info and offered to confer with a mod on the source... I'm posting on my phone so pita to dig it up but go back a page

It really doesn't matter that he 'offers' to confer with a mod. Read that exchange between him and the other poster that I quoted. There was no attacking his enthusiasm for the xbox - it was pointing out his history of attacking 'the math' as it pertained to discussions before as well as questioning where he's getting his info from. How can you not see that? If he gets credibility just for 'offering' to confer with a mod, then BY GOLLY GEE we should all believe him! No really, I would LOVE for a mod to take him up on that offer.
 
So is it sourced info or are you bullshitting? You have yet to clarify.

Seriously, junior, go to hell. I've been contacted already on the issue by a mod and have given the reason for my comment. People like you are clearly only interested in playing silly games and trolling. I was actually taking the time to clarify some stuff on here and make it clear that this isn't some random opinion or statement that I tossed out there with no reason for doing so. I've made it clear already that it came from someone that I feel is especially trustworthy on this matter, and that it was more than enough reason for me to be able to say with confidence that this downclock business isn't true.

And because I believe the person to be a reliable source, I went so far as to say that if I'm wrong, I'd be more than willing to accept the consequences that come with that. Comments made by me were in the OP of this thread, so I thought I'd come in and stand by and take responsibility for what I said, as opposed to trying to run and hide from my statements.

And with that I'm done. Because clearly a lot of people in this thread have one purpose, and one purpose only.
 

Afrikan

Member
if it is supply constrained at launch...do yall think that Microsoft would shift Japanese and other EU Launch shipments to the US and UK? and then eventually release it in those other territories a couple of months later?
 

Klocker

Member
It really doesn't matter that he 'offers' to confer with a mod. Read that exchange between him and the other poster that I quoted. There was no attacking his enthusiasm for the xbox - it was pointing out his history of attacking 'the math' as it pertained to discussions before as well as questioning where he's getting his info from. How can you not see that? If he gets credibility just for 'offering' to confer with a mod, then BY GOLLY GEE we should all believe him! No really, I would LOVE for a mod to take him up on that offer.


Well that's how GAF works man... They probably will. I'm not defending his info just that he was clear in referencing a source from the beginning and his "opinion" was addressing the attacks.
 
Sony fans rejoicing in this are doing so at their own peril. A less powerful Xbox One potentially means less powerful PS4 games for developers who start on the lowest common denominator and port up.

this unfortunately, at least at first.

On the plus side, increasing framerate tends to require less extra work.
 
As opposed to the sources spreading this FUD who have a history of being wrong.

More right than wrong. So I'd at least entertain them first, especially since they've been mod vetted to some extent (in the case of The Bird)

So no it's not even in the same ballpark.
 

jaosobno

Member
Unified for GPU and CPU. The 4GB of GDDR5 could still be unified. The 3 GB would just be partitioned for the other OS.

Wouldn't this affect OS calls? You have one fast RAM pool and one slow RAM pool. Not to mention you add copy overhead when you have to transfer everything from RAM to VRAM (or "OS RAM" to "Game RAM" if you like).

APUs benefit greatly from unified memory pools.
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
if this is the case, why go with ESRAM on the same die? Why not copy what they did originally with xbox 360 and go with a daughter die on the same package?
 

maltrain

Junior Member
I'm actually the relatively sane person that was telling people on this forum all along that there is absolutely nothing wrong with the Xbox One specs as reported by vgleaks, and that it was quite capable of delivering incredible games and not nearly as underpowered as people believe. I added that it didn't matter how much stronger or weaker it was compared to the PS4, because that isn't important. What's more important is Microsoft giving developers enough power to create incredible games, and I feel they have done that.

You can't be serious. It's always important and more in this case, when PS4 has apparently all the advantages (more developer friendly, more easy to develop for, more power, more ram).

I think it's very relevant and could be very harmful if Xbox lose the advantage they had this gen: was easy to develop for and multi games looked better most times.
 

MogCakes

Member
Seriously, junior, go to hell. I've been contacted already on the issue by a mod and have given the reason for my comment. People like you are clearly only interested in playing silly games and trolling. I was actually taking the time to clarify some stuff on here and make it clear that this isn't some random opinion or statement that I tossed out there with no reason for doing so. I've made it clear already that it came from someone that I feel is especially trustworthy on this matter, and that it was more than enough reason for me to be able to say with confidence that this downclock business isn't true.

And because I believe the person to be a reliable source, I went so far as to say that if I'm wrong, I'd be more than willing to accept the consequences that come with that. Comments made by me were in the OP of this thread, so I thought I'd come in and stand by and take responsibility for what I said, as opposed to trying to run and hide from my statements.

And with that I'm done. Because clearly a lot of people in this thread have one purpose, and one purpose only.
Oh hi, nice rank-calling going on there. The catch is I'm not the one making contradictory claims. Oh you've been contacted? Great. There's no way for us to know so that really doesn't help your case. You haven't made jack shit clear, you responded to a poster calling you out for your source by telling him to essentially fuck off because you're "allowed to have an opinion".

Say whatever you want, I have every right to my opinion. Am I too positive about the Xbox One for your liking? Sorry, next time I'll be sure to clear all my thoughts with you first.

I don't care if you don't believe me. Surprise! I understand that you don't like any positive in your xbox one negative news, but it is what it is lol.

In response to

M°°nblade;61343789 said:
Sorry but I don't believe you.

The last couple of months you've been defending the Xbone at every instance. You even went as far as fighting mathematics by stating the 50% higher flops percentage was misleading and should only be 33%.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=53870013&highlight=#post53870013

And then, when we thought you finally agreed, you fought maths again in this thread a month later ...
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=562401&page=7


I'm not trying to be a jerk here but if you don't have an actual source and just use the 'I bet my account on it' to get some extra weight in the discussion, this is the time to be honest about it. You seem to be the only contradicting third hand source.
You don't literally have to defend the console to your grave.

You've been quite keen to avoid this after being called out, and now that you finally have to address it you're pulling the rank card and basically telling me to shut up. Yeah, that sure convinced everyone!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom