• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Xbox One: Details on Connectivity, Licensing (24 hour check-in) and Privacy Features

D

Deleted member 752119

Unconfirmed Member
All this really boils down to two broad camps.

1. Collectors, people who don't have internet, people who replay games and keep their old consoles, people who sell their games themselves, people who rent, people etc. etc. who are severely affected by this and are understandably pissed off about it.


It's easy to think that camp 1 should be everyone--and it is a huge chunk of serious gamers for sure, but it's not everyone. Enter camp 2....


2. People who truly aren't really affected by any of it. People who are always online, people who only/mostly play games online (and wouldn't be gaming if their internet is down anyway), people who just trade games in (they don't sell on their own, or collect games to play again later), people who sell/trade their consoles when they move onto the next gen (thus no concerns over being able to play the games years down the road) etc. etc.


Some of camp 2 may be pissed out of the principle of the matter, but they can more easily shrug it off as it doesn't affect their gaming habits at all, and they can maybe some some benefits in not having to change discs etc.

Thus some in camp 1 need to realize that not everyone who isn't livid over this crap is a shill or fanboy etc. Some people just aren't affected by it.

Myself, I guess I fall in camp 1 as I do resell my games after beating them. But that's it--I'm always online, I don't collect or replay games, I get rid of my consoles when I move on to a newer generation and so forth. So other than having severely limited reselling options (which pisses me off), my gaming wouldn't be much affected by this. So while I don't like it at all, I'm not in full on rage/boycott gaming mode yet either.
 

bill0527

Member
but going PC only would be the same wouldn't it? All digital, no used games, no sharing at all.

prices are lower on steam etc, but i think retail will still provide that option on console if the digital stores don't.

The fact remains, through Steam sales and sales from other digital. shops, I rarely pay more than $20 for a PC game. At that price, its an impulse buy and I don't give a shit if it only holds my attention for 20 minutes. If its a shit game, its a lot easier to swallow the fact I threw away $20 or less than it is $60.00.
 

lenovox1

Member
Always online, millions of PC users can't be wrong. Need a Internet connection to Dl games off steam.

I think everyone is just blowing it out of proportion

Over 30 million Xbox owners don't even have a Live account. Their money not good enough for Microsoft anymore?
 
Always online, millions of PC users can't be wrong. Need a Internet connection to Dl games off steam.

I think everyone is just blowing it out of proportion
Need the internet to download my digital game? Thanks Captain Obvious. Now tell me if my disc PC games need to be online.

Can these apologists stop talking as if Steam = the entirety of PC gaming?
 

Jarmel

Banned
Yeah that's what I'm saying. You'll only be able to trade in old games and there will be no market for newer used games so you trade in old games to afford new. Yeah the games are super cheap because they're old and GameStop will give you like $2 for each one, but that's ok! Next gen starts now!

That's going to make a huge dent in GameStop's profits though.
 

Klocker

Member
All this really boils down to two broad camps.

1. Collectors, people who don't have internet, people who replay games and keep their old consoles, people who sell their games themselves, people who rent, people etc. etc. who are severely affected by this and are understandably pissed off about it.


It's easy to think that camp 1 should be everyone--and it is a huge chunk of serious gamers for sure, but it's not everyone. Enter camp 2....


2. People who truly aren't really affected by any of it. People who are always online, people who only/mostly play games online (and wouldn't be gaming if their internet is down anyway), people who just trade games in (they don't sell on their own, or collect games to play again later), people who sell/trade their consoles when they move onto the next gen (thus no concerns over being able to play the games years down the road) etc. etc.


Some of camp 2 may be pissed out of the principle of the matter, but they can more easily shrug it off as it doesn't affect their gaming habits at all, and they can maybe some some benefits in not having to change discs etc.

Thus some in camp 1 need to realize that not everyone who isn't livid over this crap is a shill or fanboy etc. Some people just aren't affected by it.

Myself, I guess I fall in camp 1 as I do resell my games after beating them. But that's it--I'm always online, I don't collect or replay games, I get rid of my consoles when I move on to a newer generation and so forth. So other than having severely limited reselling options (which pisses me off), my gaming wouldn't be much affected by this. So while I don't like it at all, I'm not in full on rage/boycott gaming mode yet either.

great post and I'd say that's it in a nutshell as far as people dealing with each other go
 

j-wood

Member
Sony has only said you don't need a persistent internet connection.. Microsoft said the same thing before the reveal..

Hopefully Sony pulls through as our savior..



I think the problem becomes physical media.. They wouldn't need to check online all the time if everything was all digital..

Technically, Sony said you could NEVER go online if you didn't want to.

This simple fact means Sony probably won't have this crazy DRM. If you never go online no way to validate
 
Fuck XBox One. They are literally making a play on the profits of reselling and taking value from the consumer, en masse, and redistributing it however they choose.

This is not acceptable, and is a blatant violation of consumer rights.

Fuck PS4 if it does the same.
 
smh

os8HnxJ.png

Kicking and Screaming? He makes it sound like we have no choice..lol

NO BUY!
 

TAJ

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
Always online, millions of PC users can't be wrong. Need a Internet connection to Dl games off steam.

But can play them offline indefinitely.
GTFO with that tired shit.
 
D

Deleted member 752119

Unconfirmed Member
So what's to stop them from using Kinect to flag certain keywords — swears, n-word, c-word, fuck etc — and ban a persons account, which would lock them from accessing their game library?

I said this earlier, but I'm guessing they'll make us have a store account and then separate gamertag accounts that are linked to that store account.

That way if someone is violating the live terms of service, they can just ban that gamertag and the person loses that username, achievement history etc., but can make a new tag and access the games on the linked store account.

Just total speculation on my part, but I can't see them block accounts from accessing their games. I know that's how it works now, but that would be a shit storm and surely they've though of a way around that. Be it my speculation or something else.
 

PhatSaqs

Banned
All this really boils down to two broad camps.

1. Collectors, people who don't have internet, people who replay games and keep their old consoles, people who sell their games themselves, people who rent, people etc. etc. who are severely affected by this and are understandably pissed off about it.


It's easy to think that camp 1 should be everyone--and it is a huge chunk of serious gamers for sure, but it's not everyone. Enter camp 2....


2. People who truly aren't really affected by any of it. People who are always online, people who only/mostly play games online (and wouldn't be gaming if their internet is down anyway), people who just trade games in (they don't sell on their own, or collect games to play again later), people who sell/trade their consoles when they move onto the next gen (thus no concerns over being able to play the games years down the road) etc. etc.


Some of camp 2 may be pissed out of the principle of the matter, but they can more easily shrug it off as it doesn't affect their gaming habits at all, and they can maybe some some benefits in not having to change discs etc.

Thus some in camp 1 need to realize that not everyone who isn't livid over this crap is a shill or fanboy etc. Some people just aren't affected by it.

Myself, I guess I fall in camp 1 as I do resell my games after beating them. But that's it--I'm always online, I don't collect or replay games, I get rid of my consoles when I move on to a newer generation and so forth. So other than having severely limited reselling options (which pisses me off), my gaming wouldn't be much affected by this. So while I don't like it at all, I'm not in full on rage/boycott gaming mode yet either.
Also a great post.
 

Jeux

Banned
I hate this "community" sometimes.

This is the last generation of physical media, and even during this generation I would wager that the vast majority of games will be purchased digitally. You can rage against your windmills all you want, but that doesn't mean it isn't happening.

Both console manufacturers will have digital trade in options where we sell back the license. Both manufacturers will have online rental options.

Putting a new disc in your machine will soon feel as quaint and antiquated as listening to music from a CD.

Over the last 7+ years of owning a PS360 they have not been connected to the Internet a handful of times, and only once or twice for more than 24 hours and I have lived in three different countries during that time span.

People without Internet are not early adopters and by the time these people get around to buying one of these new consoles they will probably have better Internet.
 
I would almost rather them just have outright no way to play used games. At least then I could appreciate their brutal, blunt, money hungry honesty. This convoluted bullshit plan they are rolling out just seems like them throwing crumbs at a starving person, and gamers are the starving person.
 

Vyrance

Member
Always online, millions of PC users can't be wrong. Need a Internet connection to Dl games off steam.

I think everyone is just blowing it out of proportion

dont need an internet connection to play them though. not to mention they're much, much cheaper.
 

webkatt

Member
Always online, millions of PC users can't be wrong. Need a Internet connection to Dl games off steam.

I think everyone is just blowing it out of proportion

This is the reason I chose consoles as my gaming platform. Ultimately I knew what i was getting into with PCs and Steam. It's mostly a single player experience barring line play

For me consoles have always been about couch co-op and ease of access, i don't have to update my video card drivers, etc.

Now with all this crap I may have to convert to PC/Steam as it's less restrictions and better prices.
 
D

Deleted member 752119

Unconfirmed Member
Technically, Sony said you could NEVER go online if you didn't want to.

This simple fact means Sony probably won't have this crazy DRM. If you never go online no way to validate

I believe what they said is the console would work if you never put it online--it seemed very dodgy semantically.

The console could still work, but certain games from certain publishers may not if they don't go online to get authorized.

I just have a hard time seeing MS doing this, EA dropping online passes etc. if Sony didn't have a similar "it's up to the publishers" system in place for used games.
 

Shoeless

Member
I'm unbelievably curious about how the general American market is going to react to this. On the one hand, it's usually the hardcore that drive the early adopter sales of a new console, but if GAF is anything to go by, there's not a whole lot of love for the Xbone right now.

On the other hand the mainstream media like Fox, NBC et al are going to be reporting on this to the average consumer as The Next Big Thing for the holidays and if the Xbone gets any air time on a day time talk show, the soccer mom contingent will be throwing money at it to bring it home. Makes me wonder if we're looking at a Wii situation again, and if so, how long will the bubble sustain before it bursts?
 

Jeels

Member
great post and I'd say that's it in a nutshell as far as people dealing with each other go

I disagree. It isn't people in group 1 that should accept that there are a lot of people in group 2. It's the other way around. People in group 2, even if its not affecting them, should be understanding of those in group 1. Plus, even if it doesn't affect them, they should be against anti consumer practices based off the principal of it.

Just because some company tearing down a slum to build a skyscraper isn't affecting me, I can still be against it in principal. (Random example I know, I'm just on very few hours of sleep).
 
The "bu- bu- it's just like Steam!" comparisons make absolutely no sense.

1) Steam is not the only source of digital distribution in its "own" platform. There are plenty of other venues, including good ol' box retail, that actively compete with Steam. There's even GoG, which prides itself in being 100% DRM free. No such options on the X1.

2) Steam does not require online check-ins every 24 hours, X1 does. It's not a month either, it's indefinite.

3) I can log into any computer regardless of its location with my account and get 100% functionality on that computer. X1 does not let me do that.

4) Steam got famous in the first place for the completely ridiculous sales. Until that happened the service was niche and was actually hated by many an angry Half-Life 2 launch buyer. Just last week they had Alan Wake and its American Nightmare DLC for $4 total. Microsoft is NEVER going to make those kinds of sales because they control all methods of distribution now.

5) You can even buy Steam keys from different retailers. There have been countless times where games appear on Green Man Gaming or Amazon DD that are far and away better than any time they have been on sale on Steam. So even within the steam platform there's no monopoly.

6) I can back up any Steam game I want to any form of storage I want and install the game from that backup any time I want. That's far more convenient than Microsoft's "Never use a disc again!" spin, and it already exists on Steam.

So excuse me if I call bullshit on any comparisons with Steam. As "draconian" as Steam's policies may be, they're nothing compared to the restrictions on the X1.
 

Brinbe

Member
Also don't understand how people can be so short-sighted about this. If this trend picks up in any significant way outside of MS (hopefully not!), it's potentially a fatal blow to ever easily enjoying/playing games in the long-term, 15/20 years after release. That's just fucking scary to think about.
 
Putting a new disc in your machine will soon feel as quaint and antiquated as listening to music from a CD.

I do that quite a lot still. I don't feel quaint doing so - it's still the best way to get lossless music. Why does a digital future have to be all or nothing?

Over the last 7+ years of owning a PS360 they have not been connected to the Internet a handful of times, and only once or twice for more than 24 hours and I have lived in three different countries during that time span.

People without Internet are not early adopters and by the time these people get around to buying one of these new consoles they will probably have better Internet.

Internet doesn't just get magically better in places where it's spotty.

Your perfect situation doesn't invalidate everyone else's imperfect situations.
 

ciridesu

Member
God damn that Kinect build quality is beasting

All this really boils down to two broad camps.

1. Collectors, people who don't have internet, people who replay games and keep their old consoles, people who sell their games themselves, people who rent, people etc. etc. who are severely affected by this and are understandably pissed off about it.


It's easy to think that camp 1 should be everyone--and it is a huge chunk of serious gamers for sure, but it's not everyone. Enter camp 2....


2. People who truly aren't really affected by any of it. People who are always online, people who only/mostly play games online (and wouldn't be gaming if their internet is down anyway), people who just trade games in (they don't sell on their own, or collect games to play again later), people who sell/trade their consoles when they move onto the next gen (thus no concerns over being able to play the games years down the road) etc. etc.


Some of camp 2 may be pissed out of the principle of the matter, but they can more easily shrug it off as it doesn't affect their gaming habits at all, and they can maybe some some benefits in not having to change discs etc.

Thus some in camp 1 need to realize that not everyone who isn't livid over this crap is a shill or fanboy etc. Some people just aren't affected by it.

Myself, I guess I fall in camp 1 as I do resell my games after beating them. But that's it--I'm always online, I don't collect or replay games, I get rid of my consoles when I move on to a newer generation and so forth. So other than having severely limited reselling options (which pisses me off), my gaming wouldn't be much affected by this. So while I don't like it at all, I'm not in full on rage/boycott gaming mode yet either.

This is a very black and white approach to it though. What you are saying is correct in regards to the very specifics of these two clauses, but does not take into account the indirect consequences; prices are likely to go up by average and so on, and these affect everyone negatively
 

Klocker

Member
all I know is if they are trying to encourage the DD world, they had better offer me some trade on my digital (which now looks dead) or price digital quite a bit cheaper than disc
 

Anoregon

The flight plan I just filed with the agency list me, my men, Dr. Pavel here. But only one of you!
I am in Dmaul's "camp 2". Internet always on, rarely if ever sell games/buy used games, so the Xbone stuff doesn't personally affect me.

That being said, I won't touch this fucking mess. What a god damn disaster in planning and marketing. As for the idea that Sony HAS to follow suit to keep the publishers happy, that's a two-way street. If the PS4 install base is significant at all (which it obviously will be) it would be beyond stupid for third parties to neglect the console just for used games/DRM purposes. They want to sell as many copies as possible, bottom line.
 
Yeah getting on once a month is a whole lot easier than every 24 hours. Means I just make a trip to local wi fi spot in town and validate there. But can't do that with the XBONE.
 
Top Bottom