I think the issue with carrying on with this type of discussion is that there's really nothing to discuss. Your assertion is that the system will do "fine," -- which is an and of itself a pretty wishy-washy metric -- and to back that up there's the citation of historic turnarounds that you think set a precedent for this kind of recovery and a gut feeling that Nintendo's software will attract consumers. Now, I'm not telling you that this is all off base and fair, but it's not really predicated on any sort of strong analysis that digs deep into the crux of the issue and provides good insight for what the system's recovery will look like.
Ultimately, it's just an opinion. And don't read this as a condemnation of you having an opinion, as I think it's fine to voice it. However, I don't necessarily think it's worth exhaustively defending the view, as it's really just a "time will tell" type of hunch you're working with. If and when the Wii U is performing well, you get to pat yourself on the back for calling it. But for the time being, the rhetoric you're putting forth doesn't really give me much pause in terms of reconsidering my skeptical stance about the platform's prospects.