It was released after the DRM 180. The biggest 180. The 180 that is the mother of all 180s.
Check your facts.
Heres the thread about the cover and the article
http://neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=610711
Here is Edges tweet about it being a Post DRM 180 article
https://twitter.com/michaelgapper/status/352017602131927042
I did not prove your point, i used your argument to show you that consoles that have better looking games have actually outsold the competition, SNES and NES.
Do not try to rewrite history here just to support your lousy argument. Almost every multiplat game on SNES looked better than the Genesis version, and first party Nintendo titles looked better than Sega's, its not even a discussion, its been done to death.
History is not on your side, despite what you thought.
Edge's sources are the most accurate and reliable by far.
They knew about the 8GB GDDR5 before anyone else.
Leagues more difficult? I dont think we've got anything that goes into any detail on this.
You're overdramatizing things quite a bit with your recent posts.
I've heard the architecture with the ESRAM is actually a major hurdle in development because you need to manually fill and flush it.
“Xbox One is weaker and it’s a pain to use its ESRAM,” concluded one developer.
Edge's sources are the most accurate and reliable by far.
They knew about the 8GB GDDR5 before anyone else.
Yes they are. And EDGE is the most reliable mag out there. Really looking forward to see the DF face offs in the coming monthsEdge's sources are the most accurate and reliable by far.
They knew about the 8GB GDDR5 before anyone else.
millions, not billions
Try telling that to anyone who tried to play Skyrim on the PS3
If Ryse Is A Benchmark For What Xbox One Games Are Capable Of Early On, Xbox One Owners Have Nothing To Worry About.
wtf dude. this is a spec thread. i said the most powerful systems have not sold the best. a less poweful system can have better looking games though ( like your talking about) and thats exactly why we should wait to see the differences between ps4 and xbone games.. the pudding.
Man, are you kidding? They've got the best camera in the world packed into that box. Do you realize what an equalizer that is for all of us who care about videogames?
Higher resolution = more pixels. GPU has to create and work hard on those pixels. There is no magical way to fill them with relevant data for free.
1600x900=1.43 billion pixels
1920x1080=2.07 billion pixels
ROP is final section of image compositing, they take all render data and add to them pixel shader effects etc into final pixel state.
Does anyone actually really believe that the systems are roughly equally powerful?
Anyways, the PS4 is a fair bit more powerful, I think we know this already. Why is it still being discussed?
If any of this article was fabricated and untrue Microsoft would launch legal proceedings straight away as it's potentially a massive loss to their business.
I bet they don't.
code? IRIABFWXOGACOEOXOOHNTWA hmm, I'll need some time to work on this...
Why would EDGE even attempt such an obvious blunder?
I think when you have prerelease PS4 games looking as good as this:
It's pretty obvious which console is technically stronger.
I was going to post Xbox 1 gifs to compare (KI, Ryse etc.) but out of respect for the devs I won't, they still have time.
millions, not billions
You picked bad examples dude, killzone looks nothing impressive.
You picked bad examples dude, killzone looks nothing impressive, DC looks good but then you have Forza wich looks good too and will be 60fps.
Resogun Looks FUCKING AMAZING, you should have posted some of them Assassins Creed gifs from yesterday.
Who else thought about Battlefield 4 while reading this? ^_^
It was when the devs didn't decide to gimp the 360 version.Not even the power difference between the 360 and PS3 was that huge when it came down to multiplatform games.
Keep on twisting and spinning your arguments, not like you have an agenda or something. You have been proved wrong, deal with it and stop the nonsense,
That is hyperbole.Not even the power difference between the 360 and PS3 was that huge when it came down to multiplatform games. Fifty percent is a tremendous difference and can eventually make the Xbone obsolete in the future.
If it becomes common practice for PS4 games to be held back graphically just because of the Xbone, I'm going to be pissed. The implication that devs/pubs might do it just to keep MS happy is really disturbing.
The PS3 was supposed to be significantly more powerful than the 360, wasn't it? I can't recall the console wars numbers game. Was it kind of like this? PS3 whatever% faster?
If it becomes common practice for PS4 games to be held back graphically just because of the Xbone, I'm going to be pissed. The implication that devs/pubs might do it just to keep MS happy is really disturbing.
You picked bad examples dude, killzone looks nothing impressive, DC looks good but then you have Forza wich looks good too and will be 60fps.
Resogun Looks FUCKING AMAZING, you should have posted some of them Assassins Creed gifs from yesterday.
The more I think about devs deliberately making bad PS4 versions, I have to wonder: wouldn't they want their games to look as good as possible on that platform since they're still competing against the games of other devs/pubs not to mention Sony 1st party games?
These big open worlds, which are fully interactive, do come at a severe cost on PS3. There is considerable texture pop-in and noticeable framerate issues. Playing back-to-back with the 360 version, it's obvious that Ubisoft did not devote enough resources to the PS3 edition. The framerate is considerably worse, so much so that it begins to affect gameplay in the later levels. You can get through the first two-thirds of Assassin with the framerate being just an annoyance, but it becomes more of an issue for the final third of the missions.
We will see on November 22nd.
If it doesn't show then it never will.
I don't think it's going to be like that. I think they'll have a list of targets that both platforms need to achieve. If the Xbox can't quite meet the target, the devs will spend the time to optimise it until it does reach that target.
Once they are both close then they'll release it.
Thanks guys I hope you're right.Of course they would. Did Ubisoft hold back the 360 version of Assassin's Creed to match the crappy PS3 version?
No, they didn't.
Killzone at launch, Infamous in February.Show us then at launch. Differences should be significant and obvious then not 3 years from now.
Well I don't think they've said anything like 'specs don't matter' in a long time. And I think only that one instance.
Anyways, its PR speak. We know the PS4 is more powerful. Does it really need rubbing in at absolutely every opportunity?