• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Forza 5: The monetization is even worse than you think.

Status
Not open for further replies.

RyudBoy

Member
Fortunately, I'm not a crazy car fanatic and I'm content with what they've given me, but I do agree that this business model sucks ass. I do hope that track DLCs are free. Probably not though.
 
Man, if this is going to be a trend in racing sims for years to come, I'm going to boycott racing sims altogether.

I speak only for myself, but racing sims to me have always been like an orchestra. It always felt like a work of passion built from amazing visionaries like Kaz or Dan, both leading their simulator dream in different directions, but with the same amount of passion.

I can tolerate a little bit of micro in-games ever since Candy Crush, but fuck it if games are going to literally whisper in my ears to buy DLC or tokens.
 
The gaming media should be up in arms about this. These types of practices need to be vilified. That this is coming from the platform holder makes it extra sleazy.
 

R-User!

Member
*reads entire opening post and first post and first thing that comes to mind is:

lwT4NG6l.jpg


Fuck this!
 

malyce

Member
Between the season pass, abysmal lack of tracks and the monetization mess I can't believe we still have people in here defending this game. It's a spit in the face of forza fans, as long as its flying off shelves, MS/T10 are gonna keep pushing the envelope to see how much they can get away with. I mean ALL the content in iRacing runs you about $600 with a full year sub, while if you purchased all the content in this game it runs you upwards of 3k? SMMFH

I'm gonna wait till next week to see how GT6 handles its micro transactions. If seasonals pay out as much as GT5 does and the credit to real money ratio is reasonable then micro transactions is fine by me as I don't care for the career part of game, its 100% online for me. If the game progress is artificially gimped just to get you to spend money on credits then I'm skipping it all together and re-up my iracing sub.
 

Sorc3r3r

Member
The gaming media should be up in arms about this. These types of practices need to be vilified. That this is coming from the platform holder makes it extra sleazy.

In arms?
No, but make the gamers aware of this absolutely, inform and let them to decide.

As for the topic, it seems that the game has been reshaped to encourage these transactions, that's the bad thing in my opinion.
As long as you are giving people with less time or dedication the possibility to litteraly buy their favourite cars i don't see any problem, but when you are forcing things to earn moar money then you are shady and in some ways you are betraing your fans.
 
I have watched in horror since gamers let Microsoft get away with all sorts of shit: charging for online, ads, enabling on-disc DLC, enabling gratuitous DLC, enabling season-passes, locking apps behind paywall, etc. Why is anyone so horrified and shocked at them introducing F2P elements now? We could see it coming from years away.
this
 

PAULINK

I microwave steaks.
I should have read this thread or something. I didn't know I had to PAY for the cars that I got from the limited edition bundle, if I knew this were the case I would have sold it :/
 

Sinfamy

Member
I'm going to start a gaming publication and review games for what they set out to achieve, and how they deliver, now based on some arbitrary number that lets things like these slip.
 

MMaRsu

Banned
We have a few devs from turn10 here right? They should comment on this disgusting way to treat consumers.
 
I'm going to start a gaming publication and review games for what they set out to achieve, and how they deliver, now based on some arbitrary number that lets things like these slip.

Politifact ver.Gaming Reviews?

Mass Effect : "Your choices will matter!" => Pants of Fire. 1/10.

Forza: "Laser Scans!" => Pants on Fire. 2/10
 

93xfan

Banned
This is the worst DLC policy and (intentional) treatment of fans I've ever seen.

Having one car cost more than the game itself?
 
Who cares if other games did? The fact that people gave it a pass then is the reason we're getting it now. These games cost $60, if someone wants the gold at the end of rainbow then they should either play through the game, or if the devs want to give the casual fans a break they should enable cheat codes or allow all cars to be used in an arcade SP/MP setting, they shouldn't FUCKING CHARGE PEOPLE to play the content on the disk they already bought and they shouldn't fucking charge people EGREGIOUS AMOUNTS OF MONEY.

They shouldn't?

It is well within their rights. No one is forcing anyone to purchase anything. It is always up to the consumer to make a choice of whether they think it is worth it or not. You don't like the price? Don't purchase it. If someone wants to pay that, hurrah for them, but it affects no one but the consumer who decided to purchase this content.

Te sheer fact that it exist shouldn't bother you at all if you are not going to pay for it.
 

Booshka

Member
We have a few devs from turn10 here right? They should comment on this disgusting way to treat consumers.

There is really no way they can do this without risking their job or coming off as bullshitters towing the company line.

Part of me feels bad for the developers working for MS that have to actively deal with this shit on a daily basis while they make a pretty solid video game overall. Sad that this garbage is just a necessary evil for their First Party games now.
 
D

Deleted member 10571

Unconfirmed Member
We have a few devs from turn10 here right? They should comment on this disgusting way to treat consumers.

And what exactly should they say? "We're sorry, it's not our fault"? "Yeah, we're 100% behind that, so suck it"? "Oh god we hate our game"?

If anything, they should stay the hell out of this thread and maybe send a link to their Community Management team.
 

Dead Man

Member
They shouldn't?

It is well within their rights. No one is forcing anyone to purchase anything. It is always up to the consumer to make a choice of whether they think it is worth it or not. You don't like the price? Don't purchase it. If someone wants to pay that, hurrah for them, but it affects no one but the consumer who decided to purchase this content.

Te sheer fact that it exist shouldn't bother you at all if you are not going to pay for it
.

Such a lazy and wrong argument. Even if you are not going to pay for it it can be reasonable to be upset for a couple reasons. Maybe you like what the game is doing, but don't want to support the particular practise, so you don't buy the game even though you like most of it. Maybe you don't want it to become the prevalent model, which may happen if other people support it well. Or maybe you just don't like seeing people fleeced since it has not exactly been well described in mainstream media.
 

KaYotiX

Banned
I'm not happy with paid car packs so early, but the rest is easy to ignore. I've ran 5 or 6 races and messed around in other modes..including designing decals. My avatar has made me good money too.

I topped over 100k pretty quickly and bought a new car. I've also done a number of upgrades. I have not and will not buy tokens. Thankfully it doesn't force you to.


Don't talk common sense in here.....

Marketplace is coming soon and I'm almost positive you can buy liveries from ppl and tuning setups. There are even achievements for them

This thread just screams of ppl who never wanted too or will ever play Forza 5. They see something something microtransacions and OMFG AHHHH GAMING IS DEAD.

Gaining credits is easy, I've played for maybe 2 hours tops and 45 mins of that is actual racing. I have 300k already. This thread needs a enema.
 

geordiemp

Member
Only DLC I have ever bought is borderlands as it reviewed well and looked good value.

Don't do games with micro transactions where I have to pay too much. I usually wait until games are out for a couple of months and dropped to £ 30.

I can easily afford (2x Ps3 and 2 x 360 in house, maybe 200 games) but its principal and you have to draw the line as there are enough games.

Lets hope these pubs suffer in sales and learn a lesson - Look at Humble KILLZONE offering free DLC. Just seems they want to be liked as much as make money..
 
Such a lazy and wrong argument. Even if you are not going to pay for it it can be reasonable to be upset for a couple reasons. Maybe you like what the game is doing, but don't want to support the particular practise, so you don't buy the game even though you like most of it. Maybe you don't want it to become the prevalent model, which may happen if other people support it well. Or maybe you just don't like seeing people fleeced since it has not exactly been well described in mainstream media.

So basically you are saying it is out of principle that you are trying to argue against choice.

The freedom of the devs to try this method, and the choice of the consumer to want to partake in the offer.

You do know that being fleeced means to be cheated. This is very upfront. It is either you spend time to get what you want or spend money to get instant gratification.

There is nothing about this situation that warrants a reaction that implies that they are doing something wrong. At the end of the day, if people buy into this, it will go forward.

EDIT: Just for the record here. I don't purchase shortcuts but I don't like the idea that taking that choice away from people is a good thing.
 

Booshka

Member
So basically you are saying it is out of principle that you are trying to argue against choice.

The freedom of the devs to try this method, and the choice of the consumer to want to partake in the offer.

You do know that being fleeced means to be cheated. This is very upfront. It is either you spend time to get what you want or spend money to get instant gratification.

There is nothing about this situation that warrants a reaction that implies that they are doing something wrong. At the end of the day, if people buy into this, it will go forward.

EDIT: Just for the record here. I don't purchase shortcuts but I don't like the idea that taking that choice away from people is a good thing.

I bought into previous Forza games because they were great Racing Sims with a ton of content, well produced and supported. $60 games that I felt comfortable paying for. Now I look at this and feel cheapened, the Forza series is now gimped and compromised to support their terrible Premium model. I can't pay 60 bucks and get an awesome and complete Forza experience anymore, I have to deal with all this bullshit. That's what bothers me, the only precedent to make Forza like this was Microsoft's greed.
 

Zabant

Member
As someone who does not buy DLC, this basically means I'm no longer getting content I had access to before in previous versions for my $60.

They are holding the popular high profile cars people would want for ransom. If one out of ten people pony up for that bugatti because money is no object to them, then it's all been justified. If this is how they want to do it just sell each car and track individually and make the game free.

Of course they wont actually do this as it's just opening the door for GT or NFS:Shift to take their entire audience

This is incredibly Anti-consumer and does nothing but set themselves up for failure if they plan on selling more games for $60, gamers don't forget, especially ones on a tight budget.
 
D

Deleted member 10571

Unconfirmed Member
gamers don't forget, especially ones on a tight budget.

Huh, if there's any audience that forgets within seconds, it's gamers. I can't even tell how often I've read things like "Wow, I'll never buy that EA/Ubisoft/Microsoft/random other company blockbuster series again!" and hey, the next installment still has 5 OTs and 2 community threads.

We're literally in an Xbox One thread right now, talking about Xbox One games. A console almost nobody on GAF wanted to support "even if they would cut the DRM/Kinect/whatever crap".
 
I hate shit like this and can't trust reviews for shit. Giving this a 5 out 5 my ass. Why is not every gaming site reporting on this? Infact this should hit the press, get on your twitter accounts and tell the world Gaf.
 

Booshka

Member
I don't know why everyone is complaining. Do you know how much money goes into these AAA games? They need to scale it against what the iPad app store charges for their ingame purchases. :)

Well shit, when you put it that way, I should feel bad for Forza 5, they had to put so much content in their game, and people just get to play it with a one time fee. As gamers, we should be supporting these generous companies by purchasing as much ancillary content and microtransaction purchases as possible. I am practically taking food off the game developers tables by not buying Token packs and DLC cars that take 2-3 extra purchases to access. I apologize profusely.
 

sirap

Member
It's kind of crazy how a once respected gaming figure is now proven to be no better than the rest.

Yeah, Sessler really dropped the ball for not making a fuss out of this (he's made a bigger deal out of much smaller issues before)

Glad I waited a bit, can't trust any reviewer anymore.
 

Yagharek

Member
Well shit, when you put it that way, I should feel bad for Forza 5, they had to put so much content in their game, and people just get to play it with a one time fee. As gamers, we should be supporting these generous companies by purchasing as much ancillary content and microtransaction purchases as possible. I am practically taking food off the game developers tables by not buying Token packs and DLC cars that take 2-3 extra purchases to access. I apologize profusely.

Send them a cheque
 
D

Deleted member 10571

Unconfirmed Member
I don't know why everyone is complaining. Do you know how much money goes into these AAA games? They need to scale it against what the iPad app store charges for their ingame purchases. :)

Difference being those games don't cost a dollar to play while the companies running and maintaining them often being not that much smaller than your average "AAA" companies.
 
Don't talk common sense in here.....

Marketplace is coming soon and I'm almost positive you can buy liveries from ppl and tuning setups. There are even achievements for them

This thread just screams of ppl who never wanted too or will ever play Forza 5. They see something something microtransacions and OMFG AHHHH GAMING IS DEAD.

Gaining credits is easy, I've played for maybe 2 hours tops and 45 mins of that is actual racing. I have 300k already. This thread needs a enema.
If one of the cars cost 6,000,000 credits, then you will need to spend twenty times as long in order to buy one car. (Granted, it's the most expensive one) That's 15 hours of nonstop racing. And that's only if you don't spend any of it along the way.

That's ridiculous.
 

Grimsen

Member
If one of the cars cost 6,000,000 credits, then you will need to spend twenty times as long in order to buy one car. (Granted, it's the most expensive one) That's 15 hours of nonstop racing. And that's only if you don't spend any of it along the way.

That's ridiculous.

I wonder how much the upgrades cost for the really expensive cars. Getting rid of Car Brand Affinity altogether is such a dick move.
 

Mandoric

Banned
You do know that being fleeced means to be cheated. This is very upfront. It is either you spend time to get what you want or spend money to get instant gratification.

What's "upfront" about labeling the two MOST EXPENSIVE PER-COIN purchase methods "Recommended" and "Great value"?
 

Booshka

Member
How is it possible that the entire gaming journalism space turning a blind eye to this?

Get the game for free to review it, purchase a Token pack or two to test out the Premium model for research, write off the microtransaction on your taxes for a work related expense. You got yourself a pretty nice Forza experience for $0.
 

Ephemeris

Member
Reading this thread makes me not want to open the game. :/

I'd return it, but not sure what to get as its replacement (since I went ps4 for the multiplats i'm interested in). Already have DR3.
 

matsam

Neo Member
This is pretty much the only Xbone game I was excited about. Really hope DriveClub and GT7 won't be as bad. DLC and microtransations are really getting out of hand.

EDIT: Dang, I just read about them taking away the prize cars when you level up. That was my favorite part of the Forza games...
 

Booshka

Member
Reading this thread makes me not want to open the game. :/

I'd return it, but not sure what to get as its replacement (since I went ps4 for the multiplats i'm interested in). Already have DR3.

Open it, play it, put some time into it, report back with your feelings and experiences. Helps to get an honest perspective on something that everyone is so skeptical and cynical about.
 
I am extremely disappointed in the gaming media. Almost everyone ignored this in their review and their score. This is HUGE IMO and this in game purchase requirement is just ridiculous.
 

TheBear

Member
Where in today's game reviews do they discuss "value for money"?

What version of the game did the reviewers play? The version we all get prior to microtransactions? Or do they just get everything for free? Or are they using the company credit card for the DLC etc. I really think there needs to be some transparency here. They should be saying 'we ended up spending an extra $50 on top to get maximum enjoyment out of the game' and then pundits know that if they want the best experience in a certain game they should be prepared to spend that extra $50.
 
How is it even legal for them to promote the 2700 token pack as "Great Deal" when it is literally the worst deal there? You can't even justify it as marketing spin, this is a flat out mathematical lie.

It's hilarious that $1690 of DLC in a $60 game is not the thing I find most disgusting about all this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom