I mostly mean that Gamespot gave lots of games a 6 recently. 9 seems out of no where.
8s and a 9 from the major outlets so far. I'm pleased to see that.
Destructoid:
Videogamer 5/10
After the shit storm they brewed up i never expected anything different.
Seems like the sites who are giving low scores are biased and want to get along with the recent bad previews. I think this is a good game overall and deserves to be around 80+ easily.
why do people say this? Would a game you don't like getting high scores displease you?
Numbers also aren't everything......
Either the scores are inflated, or the backlash against Syndicate on GAF was overblown...a lot.
You chose two reviews to suit your narrative, why are you laughing?
Aren't Kotaku black listed because they have leaked the last two games in the series?Kotaku didn't get a copy either for some reason. Weird as Totilo's a fan as I remember.
Seems like the sites who are giving low scores are biased and want to get along with the recent bad previews. I think this is a good game overall and deserves to be around 80+ easily.
Sorry I forgot, no fun allowed.
Didn't choose anything to suit my narrative, they were the first ones in the thread and then there was someone saying great scores. I found it funny. I got no no agenda here.
Aren't Kotaku black listed because they have leaked the last two games in the series?
Either the scores are inflated, or the backlash against Syndicate on GAF was overblown...a lot.
Scores all over the place. Gamespots review sounds fantastic while others sound like I expected.
He literally posted two reviews and said that though?
Both the Victory and Unity leaks.Ah, that might be it. Forgot they leaked Syndicate (or Victory as it was)
Nah dude, my friend had a cousin from the middle east and he swore it was totally unplayable, fucking ubisoft at it again.
Yes, my range was 75 to 85 so called it!Current Meta: 76
why do people say this? Would a game you don't like getting high scores displease you?
Numbers also aren't everything......
Would assume he's pleased because he's interested in buying the game and reviews can influence his final decision. Not hard to understand.
It means that I'm concluding from the scores of the reviews that the game is good. Which is a positive thing because it means it's worth playing.
Why would I be happy to see low scores? Of course I would be displeased if the scores were low. That would mean it would likely be a poor quality game not worth playing.
I like to play good video games, so knowing that there's a new good video game to play pleases me.
Chill.
I. Found. It. Funny.
Seems like the sites who are giving low scores are biased and want to get along with the recent bad previews. I think this is a good game overall and deserves to be around 80+ easily.
Assassins Creed Syndicate is the most fun Ive had with an Assassins game since Black Flag. In fact, I liked it more.
How can you possibly say thisCan't believe how some outlets can give this a 9. That's bordering on dishonest, seriously WTF?
If you haven't played it yet, how can you say that?Can't believe how some outlets can give this a 9. That's bordering on dishonest, seriously WTF?
Our videos are up, no written review due to lack of time so we'll do a "live review" tonight on our stream.
http://www.gamersyde.com/news_our_videos_of_ac_syndicate-17225_en.html
Also included, 2 fps analysis videos.
Ubisoft must have paid then good money.Can't believe how some outlets can give this a 9. That's bordering on dishonest, seriously WTF?
Can't believe how some outlets can give this a 9. That's bordering on dishonest, seriously WTF?
Videogamer seems to have encountered a lot of glitches, maybe they didn't get the day 1 patches? Or no one did?
They also have a video with glitches (mute recommended):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Mdn5Tn1zBo