The game drops to 20fps occasionally .
The game doesn't run at 20fps.
Oh wow..big different.... Thanks...
The game drops to 20fps occasionally .
The game doesn't run at 20fps.
I still don't understand why it scored so high given it's running the way it is. Surely that would take a few points off from it being a 10/10 game?
(I'll never understand the review system)
I still don't understand why it scored so high given it's running the way it is. Surely that would take a few points off from it being a 10/10 game?
(I'll never understand the review system)
The point that I am trying to make , or be corrected on is: The is nothing in the Wii U Architecture that is superior to the Switch's in a pound to pound comparison. Unless I have underestimated the AMD that's in Wii U, None of this is a hardware issue.
I'm fine with people complaining about frame rate issue to begin with, it's just that they immediately define the game with it and belittle the experience the reviewers and previewers had IN SPITE of these issue is where I take offense with it.Some people here trying to defend 20fps it's really impressive. When it comes to Zelda, they ask you to forgive performance issues, that 20fps is ok because the game is amazing. Sure, won't stop me from playing it, but people have the right to complain about this kind of performance, even if it is the almighty Zelda/Nintendo.
You should check out some Bethesda and Rockstar reviews.
Some people here trying to defend 20fps it's really impressive. When it comes to Zelda, they ask you to forgive performance issues, that 20fps is ok because the game is amazing. Sure, won't stop me from playing it, but people have the right to complain about this kind of performance, even if it is the almighty Zelda/Nintendo.
I still don't understand why it scored so high given it's running the way it is. Surely that would take a few points off from it being a 10/10 game?
(I'll never understand the review system)
Some people here trying to defend 20fps it's really impressive. When it comes to Zelda, they ask you to forgive performance issues, that 20fps is ok because the game is amazing. Sure, won't stop me from playing it, but people have the right to complain about this kind of performance, even if it is the almighty Zelda/Nintendo.
Seems odd for Nintendo to create a system so heavily bottleneck by memory bandwidth.
The is no power in the dock, at the very least anything possible on the docked version is possible with the portable plugged into a wall.No it isn't. The Switch performs better when docked than when undocked. That's a fact, irrespective of whatever is going on with Zelda.
I see nothing wrong with their comment. What they mean is that with technology nowadays - as it's obvious better each year - we shouldn't be dipping that low.
It was noted by the vast majority of critics though.That's a noteworthy thing that was sadly unnoted by the vast majority of critics.
Bad performance was acknowledged. In most of the reviews. What?True. In the age where games are called out for dropping from 30 to 28 FPS, it's weird seeing so many people defending 20 FPS stretches. Not saying they're 100% the same people, but you get my point. Bad performance should be acknowledged, not defended or deflected.
It was noted by the vast majority of critics though.
No it isn't. The Switch performs better when docked than when undocked. That's a fact, irrespective of whatever is going on with Zelda.
BUT THE DLC BUTTON!!!!Not even going to bother with the day one update if it doesn't help with performance.
do we know how powerful Switch is compared to PS4 and Xbox one yet?
Is anyone particularly defending the performance? It seems like the main point of contention is from manbabies whining about a metacritic number.
They're the exception, not the majority disappointed with the performance of this title in docked mode.If you look at the post history of people specifically mentioning metacritic you'd see it's not as poor as you think.
Came to say that as well.
They've been in the game 30+ years.
Technology has advanced incredibly.
Why are we ok with 20 FPS?
It's not possible, because the Switch doesn't upclock when just plugged into the wall (for several reasons).The is no power in the dock, at the very least anything possible on the docked version is possible with the portable plugged into a wall.
GTA V didn't run significantly better on 360, PS3 and 360 were about neck and neck.
GTA V just ran like shit on both platforms.
talking about how the performance issues in Zelda mean it should have received worse scores, no brainer, right?
and yet GTA V was mired with performance issues and you don't even remember them.
but that's not a bad thing. Just ask yourself why you don't remember those performance issues too strongly.
Did you have a good time with GTA V? Was it an awesome game for you?
Just because it didn't help where DF tested doesn't mean it doesn't help everywhere lol.Not even going to bother with the day one update if it doesn't help with performance.
Came to say that as well.
They've been in the game 30+ years.
Technology has advanced incredibly.
Why are we ok with 20 FPS?
Yep.The switch is clocked up, yes. But it's up to the software to properly take advantage of it.
Wait, is that what you're saying?
I know but wheather it's a bug or the system simply can't handle some areas without the frame rate chugging then that must factor into a final review score? 10/10 means it's perfect, it's means it's flawless.It doesn't run that way routinely? I mean, I could be wrong but it seems like you play the game for 100 hours and might experience it in brief spots here or there, not a constant, game breaking issue. I have yet to read any reviews say 'this game runs at 20 fps almost all the time'
BUT THE DLC BUTTON!!!!
Anything on the Wii U version? Really wanna pick it up but worried it will be kinda busted.
As has been pointed out time and time again, 10/10 does. It mean perfect. No game is perfect.I know but wheather it's a bug or the system simply can't handle some areas without the frame rate chugging then that must factor into a final review score? 10/10 means it's perfect, it's means it's flawless.
Brief drops to 20 FPS at very random intervals. It's not like the game has consistent performance issues.
Edit: Not to say I wasn't expecting rock solid 30, but still. I hope they fix this for those who want a good big screen experience.
I know but wheather it's a bug or the system simply can't handle some areas without the frame rate chugging then that must factor into a final review score? 10/10 means it's perfect, it's means it's flawless.
It was noted by the vast majority of critics though.
I stumbled across a menu to set your default TV output resolution while messing around with my switch last night. Any word if setting it to 720p changes performance at all? Not sure if this has been covered yet, I'd test myself but unfortunately I'm at work.
Looking at these scores, I don't think anything will change. When every outlet that matters doesn't dock points for technical issues, the devs don't have much incentive to make it a priority.
No, it means it's close to flawless, this would be a flaw.I know but wheather it's a bug or the system simply can't handle some areas without the frame rate chugging then that must factor into a final review score? 10/10 means it's perfect, it's means it's flawless.
If Fallout 4 was called Zelda and had bombs and shit it'd be at 98 right?