This.
At the Olympics when someone finishes their routine and the judges give their numbers, they tally everything up and show who won. They don't go "uhhh but Marco had a lot more style... Yeah, style! So HE wins, not Peter..."
Style would have been factored into the judges numbers. With technical analysis there is and should be no subjectivity. Just recorded data.
To those saying that it's just the style that DF has and should be expected from them, they need to understand that people go to them for answers on which version is going to look best, and they trust it will be on concrete data. There isn't any other site out there that I'm aware of that's dedicated to that sort of thing to the extent DF is, so we can't just go to some other site. If they are going to do things half assed and miss things that average Joe's can clearly see in simple gifs then why are they even doing it?
It just seems like the kind of behavior of people that don't like admitting when they're wrong, or when they get tagged when playing with their friends say "oh I wasn't playing anymore...". If they want to be the Xbox analysis team that's cool and that's fine, but I'd like to get in depth technical analysis on my PS3 and PS4 games from a source I know pays attention to details and doesn't slip up when translating something they should be experts in to us simpletons that can see when we're being shortchanged.