Wolfenstein 2 is using the same engine, right ?
Correct.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nintendo/comments/58n70h/nintendo_switch_is_a_successor_to_the_wii_u_not/
It's an home console with portable capabilities, stop with the portable excuse.
lmao
Wolfenstein 2 is using the same engine, right ?
https://www.reddit.com/r/nintendo/comments/58n70h/nintendo_switch_is_a_successor_to_the_wii_u_not/
It's an home console with portable capabilities, stop with the portable excuse.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nintendo/comments/58n70h/nintendo_switch_is_a_successor_to_the_wii_u_not/
It's an home console with portable capabilities, stop with the portable excuse.
I don't really get why people keep on saying this. Half the framerate, significantly lower resolution and significantly lowered graphical settings, why shouldn't this run on Switch? Digital Foundry even simulated the Switch's capabilities with a PC and they got to run the game as well without any big problems.
Nah we don't need semantics.That holds about as much water as the DS being the "third pillar" of Nintendo consoles. Unrelated entirely to the lack of any further Game Boy products. Whether it is or it isn't the portable future, Nintendo are not going to say they're done with the 3DS.
Beyond that, the hardware of the Shield Tablet, coupled with the overall technological advancement of mobile gaming, also dampen the "wow" factor here.
The switch benefits from being approached as a single platform, and optimization goes a long way. It's exciting all the same.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nintendo/comments/58n70h/nintendo_switch_is_a_successor_to_the_wii_u_not/
It's an home console with portable capabilities, stop with the portable excuse.
There's no TX1 Shield Tablet.
No it isnt until they stop mandating that games have to run in portable mode.https://www.reddit.com/r/nintendo/comments/58n70h/nintendo_switch_is_a_successor_to_the_wii_u_not/
It's an home console with portable capabilities, stop with the portable excuse.
No it isnt until they stop mandating that games have to run in portable mode.
This is such a stupid discussion, if it has to run at portable speeds (which all games currently do) then its a portable. 🙄
Or hell fucking look at it.
I don't get why they never remove the joy-cons to get the point across even more strongly. It's still the same processing capabilities without them, obviously, and almost half the size.
Or hell fucking look at it.
Or do that lolWhy not get silly with it and proper the other consoles up on their pads?
Tho the Pixel tablet does use the X1, albiet without using Nvidia drivers, nor is it exactly a good size for handheld gaming
The lengths people go to, to downplay this port is amazing.
Buh buh. DF built a similar PC (nevermind the fact that they themselves said it's a mere approximation), Buh buh, it's not a portable, (despite the fact that you can use it like a portable)
This port is an impressive feat, not just for the hardware, but the company porting it as well.
The lengths people go to, to downplay this port is amazing.
Buh buh. DF built a similar PC (nevermind the fact that they themselves said it's a mere approximation), Buh buh, it's not a portable, (despite the fact that you can use it like a portable)
This port is an impressive feat, not just for the hardware, but the company porting it as well.
And DF even said they expect their Switch PC approximation to get owned by the actual system.
I already played Doom on my PC (with a 770 card) so I probably won't be double dipping but I might get W2 on Switch for the portability.Correct.
...it literally is a portable my dude. What confuses you?https://www.reddit.com/r/nintendo/comments/58n70h/nintendo_switch_is_a_successor_to_the_wii_u_not/
It's an home console with portable capabilities, stop with the portable excuse.
If these are from handheld mode, it looks great!
If Docked mode, then not so great.
There's no TX1 Shield Tablet.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nintendo/comments/58n70h/nintendo_switch_is_a_successor_to_the_wii_u_not/
It's an home console with portable capabilities, stop with the portable excuse.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nintendo/comments/58n70h/nintendo_switch_is_a_successor_to_the_wii_u_not/
It's an home console with portable capabilities, stop with the portable excuse.
Looks as compromised as ports to Nintendo hardware for the past several generations.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nintendo/comments/58n70h/nintendo_switch_is_a_successor_to_the_wii_u_not/
It's an home console with portable capabilities, stop with the portable excuse.
Same could be said for the drive by troll posts.
Never change.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nintendo/comments/58n70h/nintendo_switch_is_a_successor_to_the_wii_u_not/
It's an home console with portable capabilities, stop with the portable excuse.
There are however people who to this day believe that the Switch cannot run GTA 5.
Let's have a measured response we can all agree with:
- Amazing it is running on portable hardware of the size dimensions the Switch is.
- Image quality is clearly a compromise to get it to run with lots of processing effects intact.
- Pixel count will be interesting. Sub 720P Isn't necessarily a disaster - see Snake Pass for a decent sub 720p image.
- Kudos to ID for not releasing bullshots and showing it how it is.
- People will buy this for portable.
- People buying to play docked will be disappointed in IQ and should get PS4 or PC version instead.
Well...the thing struggles a lot to run Breath of the Wild and there's like nothing happening on screen during most part of the game besides Link running. Still my GOAT tho.
Nothing trollish about any of the reactions here. It looks like it does to suit the limitations of the platform. That goes for ALL platforms. It's just the wording you didn't like.
Exactly. I don't get it if you have to put qualifiers for why something looks amazing it probably doesn't look too great.
I still don't get the awe in these ports. They are nearly a generation behind in graphics quality like previous handhelds were to their console counter parts.
It's like people didnt expect handheld graphic technology to have increased in the 6 years since the Vita.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nintendo/comments/58n70h/nintendo_switch_is_a_successor_to_the_wii_u_not/
It's an home console with portable capabilities, stop with the portable excuse.
Yes it will be the same as Zelda. So 3-3 1/2 hours.Jesus that looks great!
Now if they can keep battery life at 3-5 hours on the go ????
Well...the thing struggles a lot to run Breath of the Wild and there's like nothing happening on screen during most part of the game besides Link running. Still my GOAT tho.
The lighting looks great for a Switch game, but I don't understand why the images are so blurry despite already being at only 720p?
The lighting looks great for a Switch game, but I don't understand why the images are so blurry despite already being at only 720p?
I would have been happy for them to sacrifice the lighting to get it running at 60fps though. I think the huge lighting upgrade is one of the biggest differences between Wolfenstein on Xbox 360 (which runs at 60fps) and this.