For a high 70s metacritic, ARMS has a good number of reviews that really love the game. A number of the non-scored reviews adore the game as well. For people that the game actually clicks with, the game is amazing. But there's probably also an equal amount of reviewers who find little merit in the game. So the 9 from Edge isn't surprising to me.
Edge scores are a joke, as always.
Someone please post the "Nintendo Salt" GIF.
You're right, it's scraps, I can't make out a single letter.
I'm impressed at the lengths the cunt of a postman went to to mangle my copy. It's so bent it's barely readable.
Edge scores are a joke, as always.
Edge scores are a joke, as always.
Someone please post the "Nintendo Salt" GIF.
Not that surprising..
Damn, now i want Injustice 2 on pc instead ot Tekken 7 😳
That is a sick cover.
Edge is just like Famitsu really.Native-advertising at its best.
Tekken 7 - 6
Injustice 2 - 8
Lol, Edge.
They had more fun with Arms? People here axts like it was done by a inexperienced developer when it is made by the same team that made MK8.ARMS - 9
Tekken 7 - 6
lol fuck off. What possible justification could there be for this?
ARMS - 9
Tekken 7 - 6
lol fuck off. What possible justification could there be for this?
Edge usually values creativity and originality. As any critic should really.ARMS - 9
Tekken 7 - 6
lol fuck off. What possible justification could there be for this?
Is it? Its several men with guns?
ARMS - 9
Tekken 7 - 6
lol fuck off. What possible justification could there be for this?
They had more fun with Arms? People here axts like it was done by a inexperienced developer when it is made by the same team that made MK8.
It's a cool game, I'm finding grandprix 4 an exercise in misery and pain though...So happy for ARMS scoring a 9. Well deserved, haven't had this much fun with a fighting game for a long time.
ARMS a score:9 but Tekken 7 a score:6?
You got to be joking me
EDGE review scores are always Nintendo biased
ARMS - 9
Tekken 7 - 6
lol fuck off. What possible justification could there be for this?
I wouldnt mind about giving Tekken a 6 but they gave Street Fighter V a 7 one year and 3 months ago....
Ah, those developers. The ones who put no single player content in MK8 and got 10's while Tekken is held to a different standard.
I'm pretty much a Nintendo fanboy these days but the favoritism is a bit too transparent sometimes.
It's not like every game needs extensive single player to get high scores or the opposite. It's always been an exrremely silly argument or are now going to complain why reviews don't dock off points for shitty multi player gameplay with no life and player base.Ah, those developers. The ones who put no single player content in MK8 and got 10's while Tekken is held to a different standard.
I'm pretty much a Nintendo fanboy these days but the favoritism is a bit too transparent sometimes.
I do agree that I get annoyed that no single player in MK8D was totally fine but suddenly in ARMS its a big issue that forces score to cap at 8 for the same reviewers.
The truth is probably something in between I feel... Single player being poor in multiplayer games should be noted but in the end multiplayer experience should be the by far most judged.
I'm sure you played all these games that only just came out to come to this balanced conclusion.
He has a point when metacritic has arms at 77 and they give it a 9. Actually if you look at a lot of high profile Nintendo games from Edge they barring a few they give high scores for. They gave splatoon a 90 according to metacritic when that game took a while content wise to get to where it is now.
He/she has a point. Tekken is in the 80's on metacritic and a 85 for PC version.
So it feels like it's more of a personal opinion on the game than subjective on it's actually content which it's super light on and has weird unlocks that are set by difficulty and players level.
He has a point when metacritic has arms at 77 and they give it a 9. Actually if you look at a lot of high profile Nintendo games from Edge they barring a few they give high scores for. They gave splatoon a 90 according to metacritic when that game took a while content wise to get to where it is now.
He/she has a point. Tekken is in the 80's on metacritic and a 85 for PC version.
So it feels like it's more of a personal opinion on the game than subjective on it's actually content which it's super light on and has weird unlocks that are set by difficulty and players level.
He has a point when metacritic has arms at 77 and they give it a 9. Actually if you look at a lot of high profile Nintendo games from Edge they barring a few they give high scores for. They gave splatoon a 90 according to metacritic when that game took a while content wise to get to where it is now.
He/she has a point. Tekken is in the 80's on metacritic and a 85 for PC version.
So it feels like it's more of a personal opinion on the game than subjective on it's actually content which it's super light on and has weird unlocks that are set by difficulty and players level.
isn't that literally what a review is
Yes it's your impression but looking at the over all scores for arms and looking at Edge being kind of pro Nintendo since they are based in UK isn't hard to see.
Every fair reviewer out there has at least talked about Arms lack of content, and weird difficulty that locks other modes behind the level of the player.
Get this crazy ass game, especially if you own a PSVR!Polybius [9] / PS4 and PSVR tested
@ the bolded, are you literally making shit up as you go or something? lol
Seriously go look up metacritic score for arms and tekken for me before throwing dumb ass gif's.
Edit double post.