TwEE-N-Toast
Banned
What, because people like to dress up they automatically do it for attention?
Yes, why else would you run around in a crowd dress like a clown?
What, because people like to dress up they automatically do it for attention?
Yes, why else would you run around in a crowd dress like a clown?
Some people feel empowered when they dress up as their favorite characters. Others do it for the sheer joy of being a part of their favorite sci fi/fantasy world.
Are we really going to get into "they asked for it" or "they like the attention anyway" sorts of things now? Can we agree that they're not asking for anything of anyone?
.Yeah because that's what I'm implying dude.
What, because people like to dress up they automatically do it for attention?
Yes, why else would you run around in a crowd dress like a clown?
And they don't need other people, in this case the crowds at these cons to "ping" off of?
Seems like the difference between signing for yourself and signing in front of a crowd and saying the crowd plays no part.
Despite not agreeing with you in your original assertion that they're doing it for attention, I'll ask you this: is that attention for their body or for their costume-making skills?
So it seems like there is some conflation about various photography angles but it's pretty clear what needs to be done
1) Clear and concise rules about what behavior will be tolerated and what repercussions will result from not following the guidelines.
2) Actual vetted security. No more of this cheap labor via perks given to volunteers. The big events should be past this.
3) Signage reinforcing what will be expected of attendees.
4) Some kind of dialogue about how photography will be handled at future events.
The fact that these things even need to be hashed out or discussed this much and they haven't been addressed for decades is just pathetic. This is a huge event full of industry professionals and fans. Get your shit together already and do what needs to be done to keep attendees safe and free from harassment.
That ranges from 0-100% to 100-0%. There are certainly people that are 100% there for, say, possibly getting a modeling contract. There are people on the other pole. There are also a whole bunch of people in between.Despite not agreeing with you in your original assertion that they're doing it for attention, I'll ask you this: is that attention for their body or for their costume-making skills?
I don't think any of these suggestions would be a problem.So it seems like there is some conflation about various photography angles but it's pretty clear what needs to be done
1) Clear and concise rules about what behavior will be tolerated and what repercussions will result from not following the guidelines.
2) Actual vetted security. No more of this cheap labor via perks given to volunteers. The big events should be past this.
3) Signage reinforcing what will be expected of attendees.
4) Some kind of dialogue about how photography will be handled at future events.
The fact that these things even need to be hashed out or discussed this much and they haven't been addressed for decades is just pathetic. This is a huge event full of industry professionals and fans. Get your shit together already and do what needs to be done to keep attendees safe and free from harassment.
You know, I think it's hard not to draw attention if this is your "costume": http://www.tested.com/art/makers/46...y-gallery-750-photos/item/comic_con_2014_777/
Found that off the cosplay thread next door. I mean... I'm actually surprised that this was considered an ok thing to "wear". Can't see any form of body suit on here either...
It's not ok to have non-consensual touching, but don't expect to NOT be ogled at or have photos of or anything. It can still attract... creepy people, I'm sure. Like a magnet.
Or how about we stop telling people what to expect because they're in cosplay and just shame/kick out the creepy assholes?
The more important indecencies to me are the creeps who ruin things for everyone because they have boners.Well if security catches them or people complain, then yeah. There's kind of a lot of attendees to really keep their eye out on everyone. Still, that costume is a lot less than a slave Leia. How less does a costume have to be before it's considered indecent and not ok for a public place? Actually showing off parts?
The more important indecencies to me are the creeps who ruin things for everyone because they have boners.
So almost naked girl = ok, guys being aroused by said almost naked girl because of boner = indecent? Gotcha.
Well if security catches them or people complain, then yeah. There's kind of a lot of attendees to really keep their eye out on everyone. Still, that costume is a lot less than a slave Leia. How less does a costume have to be before it's considered indecent and not ok for a public place? Actually showing off parts?
If you had to choose, which one would you put in front of your child?So almost naked girl = ok, guys being aroused by said almost naked girl because of boner = indecent? Gotcha.
Mumei's anime warnings just don't convey the same fear that bish gifs do. Gotta toughen up that image!
So it seems like there is some conflation about various photography angles but it's pretty clear what needs to be done
1) Clear and concise rules about what behavior will be tolerated and what repercussions will result from not following the guidelines.
2) Actual vetted security. No more of this cheap labor via perks given to volunteers. The big events should be past this.
3) Signage reinforcing what will be expected of attendees.
4) Some kind of dialogue about how photography will be handled at future events.
The fact that these things even need to be hashed out or discussed this much and they haven't been addressed for decades is just pathetic. This is a huge event full of industry professionals and fans. Get your shit together already and do what needs to be done to keep attendees safe and free from harassment.
If Comic-Con (or wherever that is) wants to rule that as indecent and demand she put on more clothing, they're within their rights to do so. But if someone wearing that is allowed on the show floor, she deserves as much right to not be harassed as any other guest in attendance.
You know, I think it's hard not to draw attention if this is your "costume": http://www.tested.com/art/makers/46...y-gallery-750-photos/item/comic_con_2014_777/
Found that off the cosplay thread next door. I mean... I'm actually surprised that this was considered an ok thing to "wear". Can't see any form of body suit on here either...
It's not ok to have non-consensual touching, but don't expect to NOT be ogled at or have photos of or anything. It can still attract... creepy people, I'm sure. Like a magnet.
Nah, most forms of this aren't cool, either.Just like how people can make such comments on people wearing something a little more scantily clad in public. It happens.
I don't know I just like posting that.
That woman keeps wearing the same costume all the time. I guess it's her favorite. She must've gotten over the whole complaining on facebook thing cause she's still wearing the same thing.
Nah, most forms of this aren't cool, either.
Zero Suit Samus, I assume?
I want to add that unless there already is one, each of these cons should have a blacklist and they should be interfacing with other cons about theirs. Also a blacklist would be a hell of a lot more kosher if written up by a neutral security team whose only focus is the safety of attendees and not some volunteer staff with all kinds of other motives.
But again, this would have to come about after some real reorganizing and professional handling of these events. As it is now, it's just amateur hour.
You know, I think it's hard not to draw attention if this is your "costume": http://www.tested.com/art/makers/46...y-gallery-750-photos/item/comic_con_2014_777/
Found that off the cosplay thread next door. I mean... I'm actually surprised that this was considered an ok thing to "wear". Can't see any form of body suit on here either...
It's not ok to have non-consensual touching, but don't expect to NOT be ogled at or have photos of or anything. It can still attract... creepy people, I'm sure. Like a magnet.
1. That costume isn't even showing anything
2. That costume is about as "provocative" as wearing a bikini
3. What the hell?!
1. No it's not, but just about.
2. I'd say less than a bikini.
3. You can't say that guys in a crowd that big wouldn't stare at that. I'm not sure what's to get when someone in a place with lots of people would end up getting ogled lustfully by someone. You think it wouldn't happen? Something like that directs the eyes and attracts people to it. Not everyone is a good person to just look and go "hey that's a nice costume!"
I also think it's worth establishing that -- and I could be mistaken here -- I think most of us would agree that it's ok to notice and look at someone wearing a sexy costume. I don't think it's exactly a thin line between "my eyes work and as such will be drawn to a costume like that" and the type of person that is accused of behaving creepily. We are all (mostly at least) adults here. We need not pretend to not have sex drives. But that doesn't excuse behavior that would suggest having never seen an attractive person in public before.
I also think it's worth establishing that -- and I could be mistaken here -- but I think most of us would agree that it's ok to notice and look at someone wearing a sexy costume. I don't think it's exactly a thin line between "my eyes work and as such will be drawn to a costume like that" and the type of person that is accused of behaving creepily. We are all (mostly at least) adults here. We need not pretend to not have sex drives. But that doesn't excuse behavior that would suggest having never seen an attractive person in public before.
I also think it's worth establishing that -- and I could be mistaken here -- I think most of us would agree that it's ok to notice and look at someone wearing a sexy costume. I don't think it's exactly a thin line between "my eyes work and as such will be drawn to a costume like that" and the type of person that is accused of behaving creepily. We are all (mostly at least) adults here. We need not pretend to not have sex drives. But that doesn't excuse behavior that would suggest having never seen an attractive person in public before.
We are all (mostly at least) adults here. We need not pretend to not have sex drives. But that doesn't excuse behavior that would suggest having never seen an attractive person in public before.
Creeps are out there, and women wearing stuff like that should be aware that these things COULD come up and happen. Not that it should, but realistically speaking it still does.
Not everyone knows how to act properly in public though, unfortunately with certain drives getting the best of people.
I also think it's worth establishing that -- and I could be mistaken here -- I think most of us would agree that it's ok to notice and look at someone wearing a sexy costume. I don't think it's exactly a thin line between "my eyes work and as such will be drawn to a costume like that" and the type of person that is accused of behaving creepily. We are all (mostly at least) adults here. We need not pretend to not have sex drives. But that doesn't excuse behavior that would suggest having never seen an attractive person in public before.
I mean... yeah. Women in sexy cosplay do know that these things could happen, and cons are likely to have a disproportionate number of people that don't know how to act properly in public.
This is entirely the point.
The group from the OP wants a clear and well-publicized harassment policy. This is in part so that women who are harassed know what actions can be taken and that the con will stand behind them, and in part so that the people who don't know how to act properly in public will know what constitutes harassment and will know not to do it. Ditto the advisory against surreptitious photography, though that was someone else.
The arguments you're making are the reason for the proposals from the OP.
But obviously "we're all adults and know how to behave in public" doesn't apply to everyone, or this wouldn't be a problem. And the thing that worries me personally is I don't know what I look like to other people. I don't know when I come across as normal and when I come across as creepy.
So I worry. I worry about where my eyes are when I walk down the street, whether that girl noticed my double- or triple-take and got creeped out by it, etc.
I think movements like this are important, and I hope they gain traction, but at the same time I can empathize with the backlash because articles like this make me feel uncomfortable. They make me wonder when I've inadvertently offended people. And they make me worry about doing so the next time I go out. I don't know what it's like to be on the receiving end of creepiness, so I can't really identify with that side of the argument, but I do know what it's like to be fearful of how I come across.
This feels so close to the Stephen A Smith story.The rest of my posts were in reply to everyone that seemed to think I was saying it was ok that harassment goes on, but I spoke in a realistic matter that these things do happen, especially when people are wearing more revealing clothes. It shouldn't be ok, but not every guy out there is mature.
maybe if the cosplayers stopped being treated in such a way it'd help?
maybe if the cosplayers stopped being treated in such a way it'd help?