Support NeoGAF

[InfiniteCombo]

Even if he was talking CPU, vita's 4x A9 @444MHz is not exactly a match for 3x gekko's @1.24GHz, and that is before we consider the differences in RAM and caches.

Ahhh, a post with actual specs, instead of "I'm offended by this developer trying to insult my console of choice! Here are some pictures to prove why he's wrong!"

Does it even really make much sense to compare a handheld and a console from the same gen? That's "cray-cray" as the youngsters say...

 

[Escalario]

Ah Nicallis. Those guys that couldn't release La Mulana on WiiShop in NA/EU for whatever imaginary reasons, while the original developer of the game released it just fine in Japan.

 

[UnemployedVillain]

Xenoblade X looks great, but as a result of art style + hidden compromises + optimization tailored to one console. I don't think it's definite proof it's much better than the Vita. It's like saying PS3 is much better than the 360 because of The Last of Us.

Just stop. Really. Comments like this are beyond ridiculous. I don't know if you're playing devil's advocate or earnestly believe this, but you are factually wrong. Xenoblade X is definitive proof. If you think the Vita could approach it you're delusional

 

[blu]

Single threaded CPU render on Flash... ?

I know you're being facetious, but for the record, a single A9@444MHz would get murdered by one gekko @1.24GHz.

Does it even really make much sense to compare a handheld and a console from the same gen?

It doesn't.

 

[Codeblue]

Even if that were true, is there a reason Isaac can't run on Vita? I've never played the game. Is it super demanding or something?

 

[Canis lupus]

Vita if utilized well can reach visuals on the level of PS3 and PS3 is not that far behind the Wii U.

Vita could definitely run those stylized Wii U games at 480/544p.

 

[Aeana]

This is dumb.