Apocryphon
Member
Nah, Sony have made some dumb decisions in the past but they aren’t this stupid.
A ps5 remote play handheld could make use of the mobile network I think. But the benefit could be dualsense control and very low price. If it doesn't run games itself it could easily be under $100. Also you need not necessarily need a ps5, as it is conceivable multiplayer games could be hosted in some ps5 and output to a few portable handhelds.Why not just use a phone for this purpose? Especially if it doesn't do cloud.....
A ps5 remote play handheld could make use of the mobile network I think. But the benefit could be dualsense control and very low price. If it doesn't run games itself it could easily be under $100. Also you need not necessarily need a ps5, as it is conceivable multiplayer games could be hosted in some ps5 and output to a few portable handhelds.
But you can't make a PS5 level hardware system in a portable. It's literally impossible lol
But no1 cares About remote play.You know the price of steam deck right? You know how long the battery last to play PS4 quality games?
The value of that thing sucks big time
What are you suggesting is a complicated and expensive product when it can be done better and cheaper using remote play
But no1 cares About remote play.
Yeah they should wait and invest in better battery life, give it a year or 2 Instead of remote play.
Switch also has terrible battery life. Like 2.1/2 hours for BOTW when I bought it, still sells bucket loads
My point is it doesn't necessarily need to be your very own ps5, depending on how it is designed. The ps5s of others could host coop and noncoop multiplayer and share their compute.This device NEEDS a PS5
My point is it doesn't necessarily need to be your very own ps5, depending on how it is designed. The ps5s of others could host coop and noncoop multiplayer and share their compute.
Even single player could potentially be used with others ps5s. Sony could give ps store credits for sharing ps5 compute with others.
Switch sells because it has exclusive software that you can play only on that tablet...
Nobody buys a Switch to play third-party games
I won’t have decent hardware inside.on the bright side, might be one of the top emulators once hacked....
It doesn't need to be, it's driving 1/4 the resolution.
It doesn't - but we already know what a '1080p equivalent' of the PS5 power is - it's called the Series S.Why do some of you guys still think that power only helps resolution?
It doesn't - but we already know what a '1080p equivalent' of the PS5 power is - it's called the Series S.
That said - same applies to this as any portable XBox ideas that aren't literally a 1:1 match of a Series SKU in handheld form factor. If it requires porting/patching of games to run (and 1/4 resolution change would require exactly that) - it will miss out on a sizeable portion of the library (and by extension - be seen as the weak value proposition to the potential consumers).
I'm curious to see how true this is once all games aren't cross-gen anymore.
As long as it has a big block of memory and basically the same architecture (which isn't hard at this point tech wise) it should be even easier than series S ports, even ones that aren't cross gen.
Dude, you've gotten it all wrong.I didn't hear this new until now.
I wonder how credible the source is because if Sony where going to release a handheld they would have the best chance at market performance by releasing before or around the same time as Nintendo's next handheld.
My issue with believing this is to do that they would have to build interest in the product, show off the games launching with it and releasing soon after, and have a whole marketing campaign arranged. Nintendo is expected to launch or announce their new console this year. This would mean Sony would have announced console by now if this is real.
Sony hasn't said anything so I believe this is false. There's no way Sony would release a handheld late after the competition without build up.
I wouldn't say worst ever, not by a long shot. Sony's E3 2006 is in a whole other league.PlayStation is in trouble.
When a studio that's been working for five years on their game - Firewalk's Concord - shows up only with a 30s CG, then there's fucking trouble.
This shit was unacceptable: announcing Haven's 2029 game before Factions, showing a movie trailer at a game showcase, having all that third-party shovelware, no date on Spider-Man 2, no Stellar Blade (a 2023 game, let me remind you)... terrible, their worst ever game event.
E3 2006 at least had a strong first-party presence, which is what PlayStation has always been all about.I wouldn't say worst ever, not by a long shot. Sony's E3 2006 is in a whole other league.
I wouldn't say worst ever, not by a long shot. Sony's E3 2006 is in a whole other league.
About that...Nah, Sony have made some dumb decisions in the past but they aren’t this stupid.
The dumb-Sony ear clearly isn’t over…About that...
Maybe it never truly left.The dumb-Sony ear clearly isn’t over…
0%…no OLED on this100% it will have HDR OLED display which is awesome! Don't mind about specs anymore.
0%…no OLED on this
Printing money.What on earth is Sony doing?
Printing money.
Considering they're using Android in Portal, they can definitely enable Cloud gaming. I think Sony doesn't want to offer a $199 device that could make buying a PS5 redundant ... at least not yet.The existence of Q-lite implies the existence of the Q-pro
Let’s go for a last dance Jimbo
Considering they're using Android in Portal, they can definitely enable Cloud gaming. I think Sony doesn't want to offer a $199 device that could make buying a PS5 redundant ... at least not yet.
I don't get it. How is this different than the Portal?
Ahahhaa. They got me. Thanks for clarifying.This is the Portal. Someone bumped an old thread
Ahahhaa. They got me. Thanks for clarifying.