ElectricBlanketFire
Member
Seriously, who doesn't like girls kissing? Even a majority of straight men love seeing that. You have to be like CRAZY homophobic in order to be bothered by HLA.
It's not a matter of liking or disliking it.
Seriously, who doesn't like girls kissing? Even a majority of straight men love seeing that. You have to be like CRAZY homophobic in order to be bothered by HLA.
Someone's asking for an avatar quote.
Seriously, who doesn't like girls kissing? Even a majority of straight men love seeing that. You have to be like CRAZY homophobic in order to be bothered by HLA.
yeah, "physical assault" from what appears to be at least one, if not two, diminutive ladies that would not ever have occurred in the first place if officer dickbag hadn't acted like a fuckwit.
sorry, I see no excuse for this to have happened.
Guys, the officer used improper and unwarranted force on these gay women because they were kissing in public, and then they stood up for themselves.
That's being arrested for kissing. The officer used force in a situation where he was not legally justified to, and they protected themselves.
If an officer is pushing you around for kissing in public and you resist and are then arrested, then you weren't arrested for "assaulting an officer."
Holy shit.
They weren't arrested because they were gay, they were arrested for assaulting an officer. The initial contact with them was because of PDA which apparently some asshat employee didn't like and wanted them out of the store.
So it all started because some bigots wanted to get their bigot on, but the actual arrest was due to something else which happened after the buffoonery started.
so it seems to me he was the one looking for a reason, any reason, to arrest them.threatening to have them cited for trespassing because of their behavior.
Also surprised this kind of thing happens in Hawaii.
I was expecting Russia :d
Whoa wait a second. Officer was wrong and should not have escalated the way he did but let's not throw things around like "diminutive ladies". If we set the precedent while saying things like that, what will we be discussing when a woman DOES assault an officer ? Do we say to ok because she was a diminutive lady? Because she's a woman? Let's not add a whole new layer to this. Regardless of it being men or women, that cop shouldn't have acted like that at all.
They weren't arrested for kissing.
Still absurd, but read the article.
Just where are you getting that from? I didn't read that anywhere. Maybe I missed it.
As for the charges for assaulting an officer. Those charges were eventually thrown out, so that shows how weak they were.
The officer initially was
so it seems to me he was the one looking for a reason, any reason, to arrest them.
They said Harrison, who was off-duty but in uniform, followed them to the checkout along with a store employee, threatening to have them cited for trespassing because of their behavior.
They weren't arrested for kissing.
Still absurd, but read the article.
Is anyone reading the article? Edit: some have.
I thought Hawaii was one of the more liberal states?
What did the employees and other observers have to say about it, for example? Internet stories are quick to be sensationalized and outrage-promoting.
Worst cop ever.
Avatar quote of me playing a 3DS? Am I looking at hot 3D porn on it?
Avatar quote of me playing a 3DS? Am I looking at hot 3D porn on it?
I'm pretty sure the legal outcome gives a pretty good idea of who was in the right here.
if only...
Well, that's usually how a lot of the current things have occurred. An officer almost "picks" the fight and then nabs them. I believe if you are approached by an officer for a reason that isn't due to a violation, then your interaction with the person shouldn't be as an officer, but as a civilian.
There wasn't really a legal outcome in court though, they simply declined to prosecute. There are dozens of reasons why that makes more sense in this case than trying to throw the book at them. There will probably be more details forthcoming in the civil suit, which I'm sure we'll all forget about long before it happens. Or it gets settled out of court.
Somehow "Lesbian couple arrested for assaulting an officer who was off duty but still harrased then verbally, then accused them of trespassing and then engaged one of them physically" doesnt sound very concise as a news title. Im not a journalist tho.
or it's a baseless violation of rights that would be indefensible in court
I'm not sure why people are playing the "we don't know all the details" card here
They weren't arrested for kissing.
Still absurd, but read the article.
I did read the article. And they were arrested for kissing, essentially. The "assault on a police officer" was just an excuse to arrest them by an off-duty homophobe.
I guess what I'm wondering is why you're trying to justify it?
The thread title is, quite literally, incorrect. That doesn't make the situation better but there's no claim of that.
It makes the situation worse given the officer is (likely) willing to trump up the situation into assaulting an officer charges because he was so aggravated by them kissing.
But seriously, it's factually incorrect.
Seriously, who doesn't like girls kissing? Even a majority of straight men love seeing that. You have to be like CRAZY homophobic in order to be bothered by HLA.
I've been to Oahu and I've seen gay couples roaming around holding hands, kissing and whatnot publicly without being arrested for it. So its weird they'd be arrested for kissing. Perhaps the cop thought it was offensive to his religious beliefs and acted accordingly to his faith.
Huh assaulting an off-duty cop is still assaulting an officier charge or am I interpreting wrong?
I see were up to the "the OP title is wrong" with sprinkle of "we need more details" part of the thread
Yeah.
This seems horrible.
The two were arrested for assaulting a police officer and had to use the money they came to the islands with to post bail.
As a condition of their release, they couldn't leave Oahu and wound up sleeping in a park.
After five months, prosecutors threw out the case, said their attorney, Eric Seitz.
Yeah, otherwise cops are allowed to come up to you and beat the shit out of you for literally no reason. Fuck probable cause, just poke and prod civilians physically for whatever reason you want, and when they retaliate, boom. You got em.
So shoving a police officer to give you space is assault now? WTF?
Poor girls.
So shoving a police officer to give you space is assault now? WTF?
Poor girls.
the old "resisting arrest", a crime in and of itself regardless of anything prior, usually cops will antagonize and try and get a reaction, anything physical, no matter how minor would suffice.
"Oh she slapped his hand away, slam dunk".
So shoving a police officer to give you space is assault now? WTF?
Poor girls.