I fully agree.
I said in another thread, the response of trying to make their popular product (Windows) more like their unpopular product (Windows Phone) is almost baffling.
If they did the reverse - and just made a phone with understandable min spec requirements that runs standard win32 executables, they might actually have a market niche to appeal to.
When the Rhineland was remilitarized, well, that was mildly concerning, but ultimately the incident didn't warrant any stern condemnation. And sure, no one was pleased with the Anschluss but in light of the particular circumstances, the response was understandably muted. And of course, while the recent annexation of the Sudetenland was deeply troubling, the Munich Agreement is now in full force and it's clear that any immediate danger has passed.
Now, I know that some alarmists are pointing out that, even as we speak, troops are amassing along the Polish corridor, but in spite of the somewhat checkered past of the principals, I am very confident that a corner has been turned and that all parties involved are sincerely invested in working together to resolve any issues that might arise.
Let's not rush to any hasty judgements, is all I'm suggesting.
I'm not too worried about this. MS Store is doomed to a horibble failure. Even if they fixed everything and pandered to PC interests, Steam is just too big and gamers too invested.
No. If MS begins to lock their first party titles behind the Win10 store, and they're games that people actually want the Win10 store will do just fine--proven they listen to all this kickback. EA does fine with Origin, Blizzard does just fine etc.
The great thing about the PC is that it's not locked to any one ecosystem.
I'm all for DX12 and Microsoft truly consolidating console and PC, but not at the expense of what makes the PC platform great--And being able to mix and match a million different input methods is one big reason.
When the Rhineland was remilitarized, well, that was mildly concerning, but ultimately the incident didn't warrant any stern condemnation. And sure, no one was pleased with the Anschluss but in light of the particular circumstances, the response was understandably muted. And of course, while the recent annexation of the Sudetenland was deeply troubling, the Munich Agreement is now in full force and it's clear that any immediate danger has passed.
Now, I know that some alarmists are pointing out that, even as we speak, troops are amassing along the Polish corridor, but in spite of the somewhat checkered past of the principals, I am very confident that a corner has been turned and that all parties involved are sincerely invested in working together to resolve any issues that might arise.
Let's not rush to any hasty judgements, is all I'm suggesting.
Quote worthy for a variety of occasions, smart and concise .
I don't know whether you were aiming for offensive and inappropriate, but if you were, you nailed it.
I don't think he was disagreeing with you. Just that the Win 10 store is worthless outside of the only place to get ms games. I am a bit worried about the dx12 stuff though. I'm guessing many games will be sticking to dx11 now.No. If MS begins to lock their first party titles behind the Win10 store, and they're games that people actually want the Win10 store will do just fine--proven they listen to all this kickback. EA does fine with Origin, Blizzard does just fine etc.
The great thing about the PC is that it's not locked to any one ecosystem.
I'm all for DX12 and Microsoft truly consolidating console and PC, but not at the expense of what makes the PC platform great--And being able to mix and match a million different input methods is one big reason.
I don't know whether you were aiming for offensive and inappropriate, but if you were, you nailed it.
Starts with vsync, ends with Jewish people.
That's it pretty much.Microsoft's reaction after spectacular failure in the phone market is to turn pcs into phones. It's insane and desperate.
what the fuck.
Weird that quote wasn't there in the beginning.
Anyways I will use it for exclusive games or cross platform play ones. I don't mind having a few games not in my steam library.
I first thought people would obviously know which post I was referring to. However, given your response, I guess it wasn't obvious and I made a good choice to edit in the post I was replying to.
I fully agree.
I said in another thread, the response of trying to make their popular product (Windows) more like their unpopular product (Windows Phone) is almost baffling.
If they did the reverse - and just made a phone with understandable min spec requirements that runs standard win32 executables, they might actually have a market niche to appeal to.
I don't know whether you were aiming for offensive and inappropriate, but if you were, you nailed it.
why
I don't want a unified platform if the platform is shit
vulkan please save us from this hell
Edit: I can easily live without every windows store game, but if scalebound comes to the store I dunno what I'll do.
why
I don't want a unified platform if the platform is shit
vulkan please save us from this hell
Edit: I can easily live without every windows store game, but if scalebound comes to the store I dunno what I'll do.
Winstore is an outsider in the PC world. If they want to attract gamers, they need offer similar and better options, like gog did. Otherwise they will fail.....
Got to say its why I invariably tune out when reading comments to what Phil Spencers said, judge by their actions and not their PR.Why We Fight
As the founder of a major Windows game developer and technology supplier, this is an op-ed I hoped I would never feel compelled to write. But Epic has prided itself on providing software directly to customers ever since I started mailing floppy disks in 1991. We wouldn’t let Microsoft close down the PC platform overnight without a fight, and therefore we won’t sit silently by while Microsoft embarks on a series of sneaky manoeuvres aimed at achieving this over a period of several years.
This day has been approaching for over 18 months, and I need to give credit to Microsoft folks, especially Phil Spencer, for always being willing to listen to Epic’s concerns with UWP’s paradigm, and to proposed solutions. Because they listened very patiently, I hoped and believed that Microsoft would do the right thing, but here we are. Microsoft’s consumer launch and PR around UWP are in full swing, and this side of the story must be told.
Microsoft’s intentions must be judged by Microsoft’s actions, not Microsoft’s words. Their actions speak plainly enough: they are working to turn today’s open PC ecosystem into a closed, Microsoft-controlled distribution and commerce monopoly, over time, in a series of steps of which we’re seeing the very first. Unless Microsoft changes course, all of the independent companies comprising the PC ecosystem have a decision to make: to oppose this, or cede control of their existing customer relationships and commerce to Microsoft’s exclusive control.
Tim Sweeneys viewpoint:
http://www.theguardian.com/technolo...-pc-games-development-epic-games-gears-of-war
Got to say its why I invariably tune out when reading comments to what Phil Spencers said, judge by their actions and not their PR.
At least there seems to be some traction in getting this out there - though Im not sure I subscribe to his viewpoint regards this being the first step to a closed PC system run by MS, I think a lot of soldiers have to be knocked down to get there and I just cant see what carrot MS could dangle just to get third parties to solely publish on UWP (EDIT: Ah its a neglecting/degrading win32 performance stick)
ps3ud0 8)
That's it pretty much.
Except it's try to turn PCs into phones. I hope it fails as spectacularly as their mobile ventures, and I think the chances are pretty good.