azertydu91
Hard to Kill
Would that void a contract? No they are the one breaking it.Was Microsoft a party in that original contract, though or was it changed after Microsoft acquired BZ as their parent company?
Would that void a contract? No they are the one breaking it.Was Microsoft a party in that original contract, though or was it changed after Microsoft acquired BZ as their parent company?
At some point we have to agree, Sony can't have every game. I welcome MS having some notable big name exclusive
To quell the fake outrage, Pete shouldve added "..and its going to run at a locked 30fps, no performance mode."
Issue isn't making this exclusive. It's the bullshit "please trust us, this time will be different" messaging that's the issue.Huge franchises like Indi or Spiderman shouldn't be allowed to be exclusive. Sucks.
Look at all thesegamesthought experiments we will give the ps5 in the future.
Issue isn't making this exclusive. It's the bullshit "please trust us, this time will be different" messaging that's the issue.
Don't trust big companies, no matter how much you love or hate their toys. Problem solved.Issue isn't making this exclusive. It's the bullshit "please trust us, this time will be different" messaging that's the issue.
Indy does have the whip, still I don't think he will able to travel the city by swinging from buildings like SpiderMan.So Sony get's spider man and Xbox gets indiana jones?
I hope indiana jones is as good as spider man..but I have my doubts..
Where I or what I quoted said anything about cancelled version?Who did Sony buy and cancelled planned versions of their games?
Good thing it's not fully exclusive. Call me when it is.Call me when Sony take a multiplatform game series fully exclusive, rewriting initial contracts etc.
Stellar blade was first announced for Xbox and pc too before sony making it exclusive you know? why is it okay for sony to make a known ip like SFV ,FF exclusive while microsoft shouldn't? even though bethesda is microsoft owned company and they help and fund their projects.Another PS5 build canceled. Good guy Phil "when everyone plays we all win" Spencer.
Indy does have the whip, still I don't think he will able to travel the city by swinging from buildings like SpiderMan.
Also in this case, Indy is a licensed game, would Microsoft be free to just give it out to other platforms?
What?I find it very interesting that Disney signed this off. They had to agree to it. I guess a discussion was had and after Spider Man they agreed to let Xbox have their Disney exclusive. Is it just going to be Uncharted 4 indiana jones edition.
I bet there will be some fun times in the finance department when the first Indiana Jones royalty check comes in and they compare it to the Spiderman onesI find it very interesting that Disney signed this off. They had to agree to it. I guess a discussion was had and after Spider Man they agreed to let Xbox have their Disney exclusive. Is it just going to be Uncharted 4 indiana jones edition.
What?
Spiderman had nothing to do with this and everyone knows it. A big fat check did all the talking.
I find it very interesting that Disney signed this off. They had to agree to it. I guess a discussion was had and after Spider Man they agreed to let Xbox have their Disney exclusive. Is it just going to be Uncharted 4 indiana jones edition.
pocket change.So Microsoft is willing to pay to keep a game the size of indiana jones off PS5 with Disney, that must be one hell of a cheque.
Microsoft can do what they like with their properties. But they should drop the PR about bringing games to as many people as possible.Stellar blade was first announced for Xbox and pc too before sony making it exclusive you know? why is it okay for sony to make a know ip like SFV exclusive while microsoft shouldn't? even though bethsda is microsoft owned company and they help and fund thier projects.
Its exactly what they are supposed to be doing.MS smarty keeping the big games exclusive to Xbox.
Stellar Blade was never announced for Xbox...Stellar blade was first announced for Xbox and pc too before sony making it exclusive you know? why is it okay for sony to make a known ip like SFV exclusive while microsoft shouldn't? even though bethesda is microsoft owned company and they help and fund their projects.
is sony's messaging being the White Knight of gaming?Stellar blade was first announced for Xbox and pc too before sony making it exclusive you know? why is it okay for sony to make a known ip like SFV exclusive while microsoft shouldn't? even though bethesda is microsoft owned company and they help and fund their projects.
Call me when Sony take a multiplatform game series fully exclusive, rewriting initial contracts etc.
Who did Sony buy and cancelled planned versions of their games?
Case by case basis, meaning, every case there's a new game, it's exclusive to Xbox.
Sony bought Psygnosis in 1993 and Psygnosis kept making multiplatform games until 1997, and Playstation + PC games into the 2000s.How do we know that’s never happened? Lol
I mean really before the internet who knows what deals have happened?
Tomb raider 2 was planned for sega Saturn.. Sony paid some money and poof no more tomb raider 2 on Saturn.
Wipeout was multiplatform before Sony bought psygnosis.
Spider-Man was multiplatform at one time before Sony took it in house.
I’m sure there are many others.
So Sony get's spider man and Xbox gets indiana jones?
I hope indiana jones is as good as spider man..but I have my doubts..
Marvel was shopping for an exclusive suitor, even apporached MS.I have a feeling the usuals will ignore the first part of your comment lol. I mean, MS are the same guys the turned down a Spider-Man exclusive game developed by them. I feel like they learned their lesson from that given insomniacs Spider-Man’s massive success.
“case by case basis”
yep Xbox can totally be trusted while behind the scenes they go as far as to renegotiate an existing contract in order to remove the competition
final fantasy...wasnt that a nintendo thing before FF7....but none of it matters because its 20+ years ago....so by the same metric...people will get over this in....20 years or so. I guess?How do we know that’s never happened? Lol
I mean really before the internet who knows what deals have happened?
Tomb raider 2 was planned for sega Saturn.. Sony paid some money and poof no more tomb raider 2 on Saturn.
Wipeout was multiplatform before Sony bought psygnosis.
Spider-Man was multiplatform at one time before Sony took it in house.
I’m sure there are many others.
No, you are missing the forest through the trees on how MS lied to regulators and the public about this and tried painting Sony as the only ones to money hat IPs.So what i'm gathering from this thread is "It's totally OK for Microsoft to moneyhat exclusivity like Sony, does - they just need to be bigger dicks about it" Got it...
…are you really comparing the circumstances around FFVII to Indiana Jones?final fantasy...wasnt that a nintendo thing before FF7....but none of it matters because its 20+ years ago....so by the same metric...people will get over this in....20 years or so. I guess?
It was never cancelled it is the same game with the same trailers and gameplay you can see on YT they just changed the name.Stellar Blade was never announced for Xbox...
Project EVE was announced for Xbox, not Stellar Blade, but apparently project eve was cancelled.
Sony funded SFV, there are interviews of Capcom saying so. Capcom was in the shit at the time and the only way to make the game was with Sony funding.
We've heard those scripted complaints over and over, get some new material.
They paid to break the contract to stop PlayStation players getting the game. Dick move.Where I or what I quoted said anything about cancelled version?
Good thing it's not fully exclusive. Call me it is.
Truth.Microsoft haven’t changed. Phil talks out both sides of his mouth.