Diddy Kong
Banned
I mean, you could pretty much say this about any 5+ year old console and it would apply..
It's like it launched 4 years ago or something...
I'd like to believe that, but then we get new consoles with more power and that's mostly put to new shiny. Which is why this kind of plea falls on deaf ears for me.I'm going to guess the former.
AI, physics, novel gameplay schemes, etc.
Of course. If people don't get what he's saying then what's the talk about when PS5 will arrive all about? If nothing is holding games back on PS4 then why do we need PS5?There are multiple ways to interpret what he is saying. "Man, consoles suck, PC 4 life!" is one way but I don't think it's accurate. I think he is saying that he wishes consoles had better hardware.
Then let's compare Horizon ZD. Probably the best comparison. I think most people would say the Horizon ZD holds it's own. I play Witcher on the pc maxed out and Horizon amazes me with what how it looks and run on a $400 box. But it's ok to disagree on the subject. Maybe I am jaded but nothing on my pc really blows me away anymore.
The way I see it developers,are struggling to meet the staggering fidelity seen in current tech.
This is effectively the entire argument of the #pcmasterrace folks, and you know what? They're right. Yet people still buy up consoles.
In theory yes. But they wouldn't be modern day PCs where your average person has no idea what any of those components are.
No because just making a simple UI doesn't mean you know how to upgrade the CPU or the RAM or the GPU in a super easy way. Its why plug and go devices are so huge, you plug it in and only have to worry about software updates. If someone is able to make a form factor where you can just plug in and un plug boxes for these things that connect to an internal mother board they will have figured it out.
Yeah Horizon ZD is an impressive game for sure, but put the same team with a 1080ti targeting 30fps and it'll obviously be a much more impressive game. When comparing console games with PC games people tend to forget that PC games usually run at least twice as fast. I'm running Forza Horizon 3 at three 1080p screens (6000x1080) at 60-70 fps. It runs at 30fps at 1080p (1920x1080) on XB1. If the devs targeted 30fps on PC too they could obviously make it look even betterMy point was that such comparisons are pretty pointless when looking at the games as a whole. Witcher will some things better while Horizon will do other things better. I too think that Horizon looks great, but that speaks more about the resources and talent of the studio and not about the hardware itself.
Ah, the imaginary world were consoles don't exist, and people are forced to play on PC's... Universally worse for the consumer and the industry.
Just look at the vast swathes of the world were console gaming isn't really a thing - we aren't getting inundated with endless quality titles from these promised lands. It's mostly just the odd MMORPG or pay to win crap not that dissimilar to mobile games.
Fact is consoles don't hold back gaming at all, if anything they bring it up and push it forward each generation by providing a really solid baseline. They bring in a larger player base, and much more money.
Just finished reading the article and outside of the horrible writing, isn't this an age old complaint devs have.
Just develop for PC, it's why they're there
Sure but what it comes down to is the market and clout. Generally PC is very misunderstood by the general consumer, even maligned. GAF is a pretty good example of that. It always amazes me just how jaded people here are when they have little to no understanding of it, and don't seem to care to learn in any shape or form, because they grew up with something different. It's like an ultimate irony of closemindedness in a community that prizes themselves on being open-minded.
Jaguar cpu is holding everything back.
Jaguar cpu is holding everything back.
Yeah Horizon ZD is an impressive game for sure, but put the same team with a 1080ti targeting 30fps and it'll obviously be a much more impressive game. When comparing console games with PC games people tend to forget that PC games usually run at least twice as fast. I'm running Forza Horizon 3 at three 1080p screens (6000x1080) at 60-70 fps. It runs at 30fps at 1080p on XB1. If the devs targeted 30fps on PC too they could obviously make it look even better
This is interesting. Not sharing an opinion = closemindess.
You sound like a blonde aired king talking to paesants.
Where did I saw that before ?
Lets pretend PS4 is holding back PC.
What changes? Games aren't going be made faster. Prices will likely remain the same. AAA Publishers continue to AAA. But you get marginally prettier visuals though, so yay?!?!
I trust the company that's been making consoles since 1995 and continues to enjoy overwhelming success because of it to know what's best for the industry.
But the game wouldn't exist at all in that alternate universe. You need to develop a console at a price point that most people can afford to build an install base large enough to justify the tens of millions of dollars it would have cost to develop Horizon.
It's nice to want things, but gamers with a 1080TI are a niche within a niche that is not nearly large enough to recover the costs of development. There's a reason why you don't really see any graphically intensive PC exclusive games with the exception of perhaps Star Citizen (and even then that's because it's crowd funded to an extreme degree and set in space).
If this developer really cared that much about performance by all means go ahead and make the most graphically intensive game for the PC only. Who is forcing him to hold the game back by putting it on PS4? But of course he won't because that would be financial suicide.
Not sharing an opinion = closemindedness? I'm confused where I stated something like that.
It's the same if you're a PC exclusive game who refuses to touch or aknowledge the merits and potential of consoles. I'm just saying being close minded and refusing to approach or learn about new things is a bad attitude to have.
It also cuts them off from tens of millions of users.If it's that bad they could just develop for PC?
$$$
Nope. Theres exactly 1 pc game with tech better than the best console games, and that game may not ever even release
Like, sure. However, it doesn't matter one bit when consoles provide experiences I can't have on PC.
I mean, you could pretty much say this about any 5+ year old console and it would apply..
It also cuts them off from tens of millions of users.
The original Engadget article is talking about an OG PS4, not a Pro. No idea where techstunt inferred that from.
https://www.engadget.com/2017/06/11/the-passion-behind-the-prison-break-in-a-way-out/
Also, weird comment considering their game is also meant to come out on an even weaker OG Xbox 1 as well.
And, as it happens a hell of a lot more often, when PC has experiences you can't have on consoles.
I feel the same way. And to some extent they're proving they may not even need it.
For me, this generation is the first where I'm feeling the diminishing returns of performance increases. Zelda is a great example. Aging hardware managed to give me one of the best open world game experiences I've had in a very long time.
I'm going to need to see a real showstopper on the PC that convinces me the aging PS4 is a roadblock to my gaming experiences.
I do think console cpu's are very anemic, but they talk as if everybody with PC's upgrade their gear every two years or something. If there were no console business and people with similar budgets had to buy PC's (and consoles still provide a nice bang per buck), he'd still need to cater to pc's from 5 years if he wanted to sell games to a wider audience).
I do think console cpu's are very anemic, but they talk as if everybody with PC's upgrade their gear every two years or something. If there were no console business and people with similar budgets had to buy PC's (and consoles still provide a nice bang per buck), he'd still need to cater to pc's from 5 years if he wanted to sell games to a wider audience).