Hell, I'll get in on the fun too. 96Metascore predictions
Loris146 - 97
Fancy Corndog - 97
Alchemy - 97
Ricky_R - 95
VanCityGamer - 94
GribbleGrunger - 94
DukeBobby - 93
jacksepticeye - 93
Badosh - 92
Vire - 92
Pharmboy044 - 91
Soler - 91
Winners recieve hypothetical candy.
i don't know if you saw this... but, damn...
Sony is getting better all the time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7EXBvCsRQzI
Look at this hipster...
Hell, I'll get in on the fun too. 96
And what about a hypothetical plain pound cake? I think I'm the only person in the world who doesn't like candy or ice cream
i don't know if you saw this... but, damn...
Sony is getting better all the time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7EXBvCsRQzI
Damn, my daughter is due to be born the day after this releases here (in Japan, the 20th).
Don't know how I'm going to justify it to my wife .
Stopped reading at Quantic Dream.
name the child ellie and play the game but in real life.Damn, my daughter is due to be born the day after this releases here (in Japan, the 20th).
Don't know how I'm going to justify it to my wife .
Is it a scheduled birth, c-section or induced? Otherwise, babies rarely come on exactly the day they're supposed to, maybe you'll get "unlucky" and have to be stuck playing Last Of Us while you eagerly anticipate your brand new daughter?
95 sounds like a nice figure, not quite amazing but still okay.
The real question is, who has the balls to place their bet below 90?
I' going to say 93 and hope I'm wrong.
95 sounds like a nice figure, not quite amazing but still okay.
The real question is, who has the balls to place their bet below 90?
Stats aren't hard, we all already know this, and you are just stating the obvious. Guessing Metacritic averages is just something that evolved from marketing people over valuing metadata, subjecting developers to it, and therefore it infiltrating the industry's definition of success. Guessing Metacritic score is no more arbitrary than guessing who wins an Oscar or the final four and none of those impact the guesser in a meaningful way (unless they make a real wager). It's just fun little things enthusiasts come up with. Why does this surprise you?Why does the community at large give Metacritic so much weight? I just took Experimental Psychology and when you're analyzing results and scores, stuff like means are probably the least accurate description of the overall results because a single outlier score can pull the entire mean one way or another and misrepresent the actual results.
Personally I don't give much mind to a number scores. A number is an arbitrary designation, a singular icon that somehow has to represent every flaw and every success in a game. And that's just utter impossible.
What does a score of 7 or 8 or 8.5 even mean? I mean just look at the response to the Edge score. A 10 has weight because perfect scores are rare. But a perfect score from OPM? Disregarding because so many games have been awarded 5/5. Same scores, different meanings. For this reason alone reviews that give the same score aren't comparable and that's not even considering the actual review.
What matters is the content of a review. Describing what worked, what didn't, why, how it could have been improved. Maybe those good points are subtle. Maybe what amounts to a major flaw for a reviewer is only minor for another. But how can a number score explain all that? It can't.
haha exactly what I did
it's like the perfect way to tell whether someone can be taken seriously about game storylines
'did you like the story of Heavy Rain?'
'yes'
'ok thanks for your time, I'll ask someone else.'
The perfect scores for Naughty Dog's The Last Of Us continue to roll in, which is encouraging. But after playing the game for quite some time, it strikes me that perhaps the latest from the Uncharted developer will be revered for it's story. Not only will the story be praised, but it may even be seen as a pioneering narrative, maybe even akin to something Quantic Dream would produce.
95 sounds like a nice figure, not quite amazing but still okay.
95 sounds like a nice figure, not quite amazing but still okay.
What matters is the content of a review. Describing what worked, what didn't, why, how it could have been improved. Maybe those good points are subtle. Maybe what amounts to a major flaw for a reviewer is only minor for another. But how can a number score explain all that? It can't.
Stats aren't hard, we all already know this, and you are just stating the obvious. Guessing Metacritic averages is just something that evolved from marketing people over valuing metadata, subjecting developers to it, and therefore it infiltrating the industry's definition of success. Guessing Metacritic score is no more arbitrary than guessing who wins an Oscar or the final four and none of those impact the guesser in a meaningful way (unless they make a real wager). It's just fun little things enthusiasts come up with. Why does this surprise you?
I'm going with a 96.
95 is my actual guess but I'm giving it an extra point because I'm too excited.
I hope it sells well, haven't seen any tv spots--I'm guessing we'll see more once it's actually out.
this game won't have an oscar worthy story I'll tell you that
But who needs an oscar when you have citizen kane