ctrl + F Lawnmower Man
You gotta be kidding me
I have to agree. There's something about 90s CG that looks more disturbing than modern CG. I haven't seen The Lawnmower Man but that gif actually unnerves me a bit.Actually I think it works a bit better now because 90s CG is a bit unnerving to look at.
Does this count?
This makes me want to watch it. 5ish rating on IMDB, not good. But I like the idea of a CGI nightmare zone.ctrl + F Lawnmower Man
You gotta be kidding me
I like how his upper body actually starts accelerating upwards after it's been cut.
This. This I have always hated for how bad the arms lookThe falling scene in Robocop
Though the arms always looked off to me.
Damn. I didn't even think twice about this when I saw the movie. I'm sure in 5 years we'll all be talking about how shitty it looks
Time, resources, financial, physical constraints often prevent the visual effects of some of these films to be fully realized. I'm sure you like your work to be criticized by arm-chair internet experts on your work done under duress, yeah ?
While I agree that the CG here has "aged", it still holds up better than so many of the other examples in this thread. There was still a lot of careful attention to detail applied to the lighting, animation and positioning of the camera that helps the scene overcome its technical limitations.
It sort of depends on what kind of definition people have for best. I think the best kind of cgi is usually the one you don't even notice.Feels like it would be much harder doing the reverse of this thread (with no puppet animation).
This. This I have always hated for how bad the arms look
I really can't believe this! :OAttack of the Clones
How can you hate it? It's part of the charm, something my friends and I had laughs about at school and have fond memories of.
All three Star Wars prequels have aged dreadfully.
Honestly, I thought it looked really good and seemed to fit the Tron world. It only looked out of place in that scene from 1989. Should have kept him in the dark because it did not look good in natural lighting.
I was gobsmacked by the T-800 in Terminator Genesys. Pretty seemless.
Spawn deserved better
The shark in Jaws looks terrible. Stiff and robotic as fuck.
Oh jeez another GAF thread shitting on visual effects when you guys don't know anything about the process. Carry on as usual.
Is that the one where the actual surfers are clearly guys with her head superimposed? I've never seen the movie; I just remember reading about it when it came out.
whats wrong with it?Off topic but what about recent release who's CGI is gonna hold up in time.
I nominate the creation scene in Noah(2014).
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KMDWWDZ8ozE
That is not noticeable when in motion.
The rest of Jurassic Park holds up amazingly, that first T-Rex scenes and raptors.
JP aged like fine wine, except for the first dinosaur reveal scene, that brachiosaurus, when you watch it again in HD, it doesn't hold up well.
Basicly during test screenings the mask they originally used had alot of complaints. There were some scenes they couldn't reshoot and in that one seen they used CGI to change it.Is that real?... why?...
Basicly during test screenings the mask they originally used had alot of complaints. There were some scenes they couldn't reshoot and in that one seen they used CGI to change it.
This post has more info. http://www.campblood.net/forum/index.php?topic=7978.0
Attack of the Clones
The Burly Brawl looked like hot trash even in 2003. All the hype for that scene just made it worse.
The first Toy Story is a classic, but it aged quite a bit for today.
The first Toy Story is a classic, but it aged quite a bit for today.
CLU's face in TRON: Legacy. I mean, the rest of the movie still looks fine.
I think even in 2010 people were put off and going "uncanny valley," but it was made extra jarring to me after being surprisingly impressed by Ant-Man 'de-aging' Michael Douglas and even Arnold in Terminator Genisys.
They were updated somewhat for the 3D release and Blu-ray. It was a whole new render with updated shaders and lighting, plus added resolution since the original wasn't 1080p. Not hugely so because they wanted it to still look like Toy Story, but an improvement.I want a Special Edition of Toy Story 1 with updated visuals.
Spawn looked awful back then too. Terrible movie in all regards.The CG effects in the 90's Spawn movie look so awful.
I thought spawn had some ok cgi in it.
The cape always looked cool to me too.
God we need a new spawn movie.
I thought spawn had some ok cgi in it.
The cape always looked cool to me too.
God we need a new spawn movie.
I thought spawn had some ok cgi in it.
The cape always looked cool to me too.
God we need a new spawn movie.
This makes me want to watch it. 5ish rating on IMDB, not good. But I like the idea of a CGI nightmare zone.
Why not just get a couple guys in suits in front of a green screen? Unnecessary use of CG is really annoyingAttack of the Clones
I was told the back story for mal.
Company had like a week to do it, so they just mashed up a warewolf from *citation needed* that they were working on, from a previous movie. Warewolf in paris maybe?
They had no time to even animate a mouth.
Something to that efffect. Clearly a rush job, but literally had no time to do it.