SolidSnakex
Member
What rumor? The game has been confirmed for launch awhile ago.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=482486
What rumor? The game has been confirmed for launch awhile ago.
I guess I'm the only one that wasn't very impressed by that Metal Gear demo.
Why weren't you impressed?
You should realize Nintendo's reality. They are running out of resources, they are trying to cover too much ground with 2 platforms and software development has become more complex and intensive over the years.Japanese 3rd party would have to be absolutely stellar to fix this whole situation. Usually, you must let your potential launch buyers know what exactly they can expect in the future. This whole ,,launch window only'' strategy is flat-out idiotic, even more so since the launch really isn't that spectacular anyway. People try to label it as great, though it completely lacks what you'd want from a Nintendo console (Nintendo games that aren't cash-ins with hardly any effort behind them) and unlike 3DS etc, as already mentioned, you don't have any idea what's beyond. They must be in super arrogance mode again to start their new console like this. Or maybe they just completely mishandled their development. In both cases they need some serious slapping, because I fear the future for this thing if they succeed with this ridiculous strategy.
Yea thats been debunked to hell and back. Itll be a launch title.
I guess I'm the only one that wasn't very impressed by that Metal Gear demo.
You should realize Nintendo's reality. They are running out of resources, they are trying to cover too much ground with 2 platforms and software development has become more complex and intensive over the years.
That's why, after the Wii release i wished for them to focus on a single platform. Imagine the type of output we would've been getting if they just concentrated in the 3DS for example, by now we could be hiring about the next Zelda or Metroid offerings. Instead a ton of energy was invested in R&D for the next home console.
You should realize Nintendo's reality. They are running out of resources, they are trying to cover too much ground with 2 platforms and software development has become more complex and intensive over the years.
That's why, after the Wii release i wished for them to focus on a single platform. Imagine the type of output we would've been get we woud get if they just concentrated in the 3DS, by now we could be hiring about the next Zelda or Metroid offerings. Instead a ton of energy was invested in R&D for the next home console.
You should realize Nintendo's reality. They are running out of resources, they are trying to cover too much ground with 2 platforms and software development has become more complex and intensive over the years.
That's why, after the Wii release i wished for them to focus on a single platform. Imagine the type of output we would've been getting if they just concentrated in the 3DS for example, by now we could be hiring about the next Zelda or Metroid offerings. Instead a ton of energy was invested in R&D for the next home console.
I don't know how to put this withouth upsetting people but... notice that the quality of their games is lower these days and they are outputting very similar products. So yes, im worried about the resources. I was hoping for them to concentrate on the 3DS and cook more the WiiU concept or launch the hybrid consoleNintendo Knows they need more resources. Over the past year they have been expanding tremendously and hiring devs from all over the place. Nintendo is even building a new EAD R&D team that will have 1,500 devs working in it so i wouldn't really worry about their ability to dish out first party content.
Well we can't blame here, the 3DS was going through serious growing pains so they needed to save the situation by focusing even more resources towards it.Yeah, I actually feel that 3DS is actually getting too much 1st party devotion. DS was great for its variety of 3rd party games and hence lack of 1st party or underwhelming software such as the Zeldas never really stood out. For the 3DS, they are already pumping out a ridiculous amount of Nintendo games that actually would have been expected on home consoles (Paper Mario, Luigis Mansion... Kid Icarus also seems like a game made for the Wiimote). Though I believe there surely could have been a much better balance.
3DS gets Pushmo, Paper Mario and Fire Emblem from Intelligent Systems within the shortest amount of time while for the WiiU they develop... the most miserable looking Wario game in history? Nintendo could have handled development better than this, right now the WiiU couldn't possibly look any less ambitious.
I'm sure there are some small tidbits that we havnt seen yet, and we definitelly dont know all the details indeed (like how the friend list/system will work and if there is an universal achievements/trophy system). But i cant imagine that they're holding off something big and very significant at this point in fear of competition. Announcing more new games at this point would also surprise me a lot, especially games that are tailor made for the WiiU.Well no, they've not connected the dots. We don't know what the full OS will look like, what they intend to do with NFC, what apps/Wii U channels will be available, how deep their online service is, if Miiverse is implemented in all games, to what extent etc.
Then they didn't show their 2nd wave of games because Iwata thought their concepts could give ideas and get copied. I'm sure I read something along these lines.
I believe Nintendo is not unhappy to be underestimated while their competitors would still have time to change their plans.
Why weren't you impressed?
No Wii-U logo.
Nintendo seems to be very serious about holding their cards close until the last minute. For a logical guess, I don't think Iwata does not want Sony and Microsoft to get too uncomfortable with their position yet.I don't know how to put this withouth upsetting people but... notice that the quality of their games is lower these days and they are outputting very similar products. So yes, im worried about the resources. I was hoping for them to concentrate on the 3DS and cook more the WiiU concept or launch the hybrid console
Well we can't blame here, the 3DS was going through serious growing pains so they needed to save the situation by focusing even more resources towards it.
I don't know why they are so afraid to mark the territory in the home console realm with an early release into next gen. Nintendo operates at it's own rythm so i don't think arraving later than the competition would have hurt them significantly. We could have ended with a more polished WiiU system with better showcase games.
Yeah its kind of sad that wiiu isnt even getting current gen ports let alone the next gen stuff.
Other than NSMB I don't know how the game's quality has gotten lower.I don't know how to put this withouth upsetting people but... notice that the quality of their games is lower these days and they are outputting very similar products. So yes, im worried about the resources.
Quality is lower? Cause this gen they've released some of their best games ever... Although quality is, of course, subjective. And what do you mean by similar? Similar to who, themselves?I don't know how to put this withouth upsetting people but... notice that the quality of their games is lower these days and they are outputting very similar products.
There was that Amazon France listing posted... that put it at 350 Euro... roughly 280 GBP...Let's hope that's a Euro price, cos if it was £280 on launch, even I would hesitate.
I don't know how to put this withouth upsetting people but... notice that the quality of their games is lower these days and they are outputting very similar products. So yes, im worried about the resources. I was hoping for them to concentrate on the 3DS and cook more the WiiU concept or launch the hybrid console
Yes, themselves. How many games riding the same concept do we want? These games stick very close to the predecesors. For example, Galaxy 1 and 2. Now, the thrid Wii Fit, Pikimin 3, 2 New Super Mario Bros games months apart, yet another Luigis Mansion. Their New IP for the system launch is yet another tech demo mini game compilation with some of them riding in very old concepts. More Paper Mario RPG's. Among others.Quality is lower? Cause this gen they've released some of their best games ever... Although quality is, of course, subjective. And what do you mean by similar? Similar to who, themselves?
Yes, themselves. How many games riding the same concept do we want? These games stick very close to the predecesors. For example, Galaxy 1 and 2. Now, the thrid Wii Fit, Pikimin 3, 2 New Super Mario Bros games months apart, yet another Luigis Mansion. Their New IP is yet another tech demo mini game compilation. More Paper Mario RPG's. Among others.
Are there really that many internally developed Nintendo titles on either system right now?
I'm more concerned about how they will distribute their franchises throughout Wii U's and 3DS's life.
Wii had amazing first party support the first 4 years but the rest... was abysmal at best.
They need to sit down and plan this thoroughly
I don't know if Nintendo's conference news will end up causing more controversy and disappointment or actually put a smile on our faces. Maybe it's a combination of all of the above.
You are not getting the essence of my post, it wasn't about Galaxy being a game of x quality or my personal feelings about it. The point was that Mario Galaxy 2 while exellent was raiding the same concept as the first one. Also Galaxy is the highest quality game Nintendo has developed in the entire Wii cycle. Pikmin 3 is a ported up Wii game. Lugi's Mansion didn't have the quality or was a concept that needed yet another sequel, it was just a quick proyect to kick start the GC with a familiar Mario universe character. If they wanted something with Luigi at least come up with something fresh, as it is, it was just a quick way to recycle something they had in the closet for years. Wii Fit U it's like the latest iteration of a sport franchize.You're complaining about Galaxy 2? Really?
New Wii Fit is only the 3rd in two generations, and wasn't the 2nd just a sort of upgrade? (Don't play WF so I have no clue...)
Pikmin skipped a whole gen.
You sort of have a point with NSMB, but I doubt we'll see another till next gen so it's not exactly bad (It's only 1 per system).
Yet another Luigi's Mansion? It's only the second, and the first was a launch title last gen.
We get 1 Paper Mario a gen, and this one seems to be quite different from its predecessors (World map, no exp, no partners, sticker system).
The only one worth complaining about is NSMB, and maybe Wii Fit. I mean, compare these with other developers. 4 Uncharted's, 4 Gears of War, 3 Final Fantasy XIII's, all in this gen... I could go on.
You can't be more farther from the truth Im not excited for the new SC, i just pointed out that i accepted what the series has become. ANd you keep ignoring the point im traying to make by focusing on Mario Galaxy. That was just an example.For someone who's seemingly excited for the Splintercell game I'm not sure how you're dogging Nintendo for making two SMG games.
Have played the two of them in GC, plus the 2 Wii controller enhanced versions. Fantastic games, yet not a system moving franchise friend. Plus is not a game taylor made for WiiU. Hope that is clear for you now.lol Pikmin 3 once again dismissed and tossed aside as just a "Up res Wii port"
Makes me question if only 5 GAFers have played a Pikmin game.
This gen would have been nintendos had they released this console in the first place.
Zomnbie u looks really good.
You are not getting the essence of my post, it wasn't about Galaxy being a game of x quality or my personal feelings about it. The point was that Mario Galaxy 2 while exellent was raiding the same concept as the first one. Also Galaxy is the highest quality game Nintendo has developed in the entire Wii cycle. Pikmin 3 is a ported up Wii game. Lugi's Mansion didn't have the quality or was a concept that needed yet another sequel, it was just a quick proyect to kick start the GC with a familiar Mario universe character. If they wanted something with Luigi at least come up with something fresh, as it is, it was just a quick way to recycle something they had in the closet for years. Wii Fit U it's like the latest iteration of a sport franchize.
Im not saying Nintendo shouldn't fall back to they sure fire printing money hits. The problem is that the frequency of the franchises is increasing, the concepts aren't getting much diversity or "newness" and the amount of earthsahing stuff (Mario 64, OoT for example) is diminishing. Where's the WiiU defining launch game? Where's the Super Mario World, Mario 64 or Wii Sport? The only Nintendo console with that type of Nintendo softness was the GameCube with Luigi's Mansion.
You are not getting the essence of my post, it wasn't about Galaxy being a good or bad game. The point was that Mario Galaxy 2 while exellent was raiding the same concept as the first one.
It's a sequel to one of the best platforming games ever. How much would you expect them to change the concept? I don't see Gears of War 2/3 changing their concept. That's what sequels do, they take the formula of the original and try to improve it as best they can.You are not getting the essence of my post, it wasn't about Galaxy being a game of x quality or my personal feelings about it. The point was that Mario Galaxy 2 while exellent was raiding the same concept as the first one.
Pikmin 3 is a ported up Wii game.
Lugi's Mansion didn't have the quality or was a concept that needed yet another sequel, it was just a quick proyect to kick start the GC with a familiar Mario universe character.
If they wanted something with Luigi at least come up with something fresh, as it is, it was just a quick way to recycle something they had in the closet for years.
Sport games are yearly, Wii Fit isn't...Wii Fit U it's like the latest iteration of a sport franchize.
The problem is that the frequency of the franchises is increasing, the concepts aren't getting much diversity or "newness" and the amount of earthsahing stuff (Mario 64, OoT for example) is diminishing.
You want Super Mario World? You have NSMBU. Wii Sports? Nintendo Land. Those will be the defining launch games along with the smaller games like Pikimn, Zombi U and P-100.Where's the WiiU defining launch game? Where's the Super Mario World, Mario 64 or Wii Sport? The only Nintendo console with that type of Nintendo softness in it's launch was the GameCube with Luigi's Mansion.
I'm really excited about that as well. I'm not expecting new game announcements, but I think we'll get detailed information on the OS and MiiVerse. We'll also probably get details on any built-in applications as well as insight on capabilities such as video chat and multitasking.I actually can't wait to have a deep look at the OS during the conference.
It's incredible how you can't understand the main point that drive's a post and just center in taking some examples as literally as possible. It's even like you didn't read a word and just assumed im critisizing Galaxy.This reminds me of when Galaxy 2 was announced/released. Remember how many times you heard SMG2 called an expansion pack, by posters and even media/reviewers? How many reviews called Gears 3 (just picked a random example) an expansion pack because it mostly used the same assets and mechanics?
Or with NSMB2 and NSMBU: how many complaints about "milking the well dry"etc have we heard, from every corner of the internet? We have four NSMB games, that use similar art styles and mechanics, released over the course of about six years, on four platforms, the most recent two about three months apart. Then look at Uncharted, four games that use similar art styles and mechanics, released over the course of about six years, on two platforms, the most recent two about three months apart. Yet there is no huge outcry, no constant drumbeat about how Sony is creatively bankrupt etc.
Again, the hole point flew by. No point in proceding with the argument. Can't reason with people that are too invested in "x" company.It's a sequel to one of the best platforming games ever. How much would you expect them to change the concept? I don't see Gears of War 2/3 changing their concept. That's what sequels do, they take the formula of the original and try to improve it as best they can.
Okay... So they took a Wii game and decided to make to a Wii U game instead. I don't see your point here.
While it was a short game, and thus most likely quite a quick project, as you put it, it was still a quality title. A much improved sequel (At least it looks that way so far) with 3 different mansions, what, a decade later isn't something to complain about.
Fresh? How is ghost hunting not fresh? How many other ghost hunting games have you seen?
Sport games are yearly, Wii Fit isn't...
Saw this in GameStop too. Black WiiU for me!Totally forgot to post this last week when checked out what was new at my local Gamestop. Didn't have to look far.
Pretty much slap dab in front of the door as soon as you come in. I know other pics have been posted, but man if I didn't feel goosebumps seeing it face to face in my own neighborhood.
Almost like it's a small monolith that echoed off to me in an old wise man's voice, "don't forget about the 13th you little shit!!!"
It seems like it's hard to plan, since they will often push games until they are ready. From all the Iwata Asks and other interviews Ive read, it happens a lot. Which ultimately leads to better games, so Im fine with it.
I get your point, that you think Nintendo don't inject as much variation into their titles as they used to, and used various sequels (Ignoring things like the difference between say, Sunshine and Galaxy, or Majora's Mask and Wind Waker) to try and prove that point. So, instead of replying to my points, you're just waving them off with 'LOL NINTENDO FANBOY'. Veeeery sneaky.Again, the hole point flew by. No point in proceding with the argument. Can't reason with people that are too invested in "x" company.
I think they expect that to be Nintendo Land. It'll be a big seller no doubt, but I doubt it'll have the same effect as Wii Sports did.Not going to touch on Nintendo's software history over the last generation or so just yet, but I too lament the lack of a system defining, unique title at the launch of the Wii U. The absence of such a unique game from Nintendo contributed to my disappointment over their E3 showing. It's not a question of software quality, but the Wii U is absolutely missing the traditional ground breaking, system defining unexpected behemoth that, even if not at launch, is at least advertised.
It's Nintendo's safest, most predictable line-up yet, even if it is fun.