Why not an option to choose?
Would be great. But very much doubt it.
Me 2. Been using my launch unit for almost 4 years now.
Jup rockin that baby also still. Even still use day one controller haha.
Why not an option to choose?
Me 2. Been using my launch unit for almost 4 years now.
Pre E3:
Xbox One: The odd exclusive / Barely played it
PS4 Pro: Multi-platform / Exclusives / Primary console
Post E3:
Xbox One X: Multi-platform games / The odd exclusive / Primary console
PS4 Pro: Exclusives
Like most people I made the switch to PS4 after what was a disappointing start to the gen with Xbox One. Given the power advantage and the fact its able to play UHD Blu-rays, ill be switching back. No fanboyism just the fact it will play better looking and performing games. (And yes I also have a great gaming PC)
Worth saying that it is a pre-alpha build.
Worth saying that it is a pre-alpha build.
After reading that technical performance of a given game i.e. Destiny 2 is still determined by the discretion of the developer for any given reason completely defeats the purpose of buying this system for me... I was considering buying this in place of a new gaming PC.
I don't want to get into semantics with what classifies as a "big game"... but I was expecting that one of the titles between GoW, Detroit, or Days Gone, would hit this fall... something they would push with a lot of marketing. GT Sport will of course be solid, though.
It's a strategy we've seen from Sony for quite a few years now... rely on 3rd party marketing to sell consoles in the holiday season and push your 1P stuff elsewhere. It works, but them not having a barrage of big games does free up just a bit of headspace that MS can insert the One X into.
Maybe I'm totally off base on that.
Can someone explain to me how exactly this thing is as small as it is? I saw a picture next to a One S and it seems noticably smaller.
Magic? Vodoo? A soul pact with Satan? Or just good engineering (and, if so, how exactly)?
Anyway, I'm going to look out for a teardown video come November ...
I was initially in denial that Xbox One X would run me $499, and when the price got announced I just accepted that I wouldn't buy one this year. Now I've finally come around and realized that the hardware is worth that price to me. I'll be playing the vast majority of my games on Xbox and I'll get no real benefit out of holding off on upgrading.
Where the hell are those pre-orders?
Are there enough games to justify the hardware?
Right now we don't know exactly how the majority of titles are going to be affected, in what way and to what extent.
I know it's a small thing, but I'd dig that if it were in the final build.
I'm super down on that release date. All these great games that come out in September and October and I have to let them sit on my hard drive without playing them. FeelsBadMan
I know! It's gonna be a long wait.
BTW - is it me or is every thread today been either Phil or Xbox One X related. It's crazy day
Really hope they give the option between 4K/30 and 1080/60 in Horizon 3, don't see why they wouldn't as long as it defaults to the whole 4K thing they have going on. Plenty of games on PS4 Pro seem to have options like these.
I don't know how people have come to the conclusion because the architecture is Jaguar these CPU's are suddenly useless. It's still a 2.3Ghz Eight Core Jaguar (with some possible changes), it's as if Jaguar has become some kind of anti-console buzzword. A great example is seeing just how big of a performance increase we can see in an ACTUALLY CPU bound game, like Battlefield 1 with 64 players. Looking at PS4 Pro footage I have no doubt it will be solid 60 on One X. Horizon 3 as well just recently had a complete overhaul of their multi threading taking the game from 30fps to 60fps on a number of PC's. I doubt One X's CPU would have any trouble with Horizon 3, same with Destiny. Destiny 2 is probably locked to 30fps for parity more than anything, just like there was parity between Xbox One and PS4 with the original.If a game is CPU bound, it doesn't matter how much you reduce the resolution, it won't run at 60fps.
Does anybody know if we can just plug and play our existing external hard drives that we used on Xbox One without having to redownload games?
I'm really not understanding this decision to submit it to the FCC so late and delaying pre-orders? It seems like the best bet would've been to open them immediately after the conference instead of letting the negativity and commentary set in for an undetermined amount of time before allowing preorders.
I'm really not understanding this decision to submit it to the FCC so late and delaying pre-orders? It seems like the best bet would've been to open them immediately after the conference instead of letting the negativity and commentary set in for an undetermined amount of time before allowing preorders.
549$ confirmed
I don't know how people have come to the conclusion because the architecture is Jaguar these CPU's are suddenly useless. It's still a 2.3Ghz Eight Core Jaguar (with some possible changes), it's as if Jaguar has become some kind of anti-console buzzword.
Hmmm I guess we'll have to wait and see, Battlefield 1 is probably the best example of a CPU bound game, as it hovers around 35-45fps in 64 player mayhem in multiplayer on PS4 if I recall. It's already gotten a huge boost with the Pro, excited to see it on One X. As well as Unity, although Unity has already gone from 20fps CPU bottlenecked to solid 30fps on the pro.The fact of the matter is that XBX's CPU only has a 200 MHZ overclock over PS4 Pro's. That's only going to amount to a few frames.
If Pro can't get 60fps in a CPU bound game(which usually means the OG PS4 game isn't 60fps either) than the Scorpio will not be 60fps in that game. Its really simple.
I'm super down on that release date. All these great games that come out in September and October and I have to let them sit on my hard drive without playing them. FeelsBadMan
Thought this would come with an elite controller.
JC:Could we see SKUs with bigger hard drives, or multiple colors? There's that incredible Gears of War laser-cut Xbox One S version for example ...
MN:So the plan that we're announcing now, the initial plan, is the launch with the black coloring that you saw today. We'll have some other news as we get closer and start taking preorders later in the year. Special versions and things like that, that we'll get to. We decided to keep it simple today, considering the tech specs we had to show and all the games we wanted to share. We just decided to spread some things out that we know people will be interested in, that goes in the area of special editions as well.
As someone who uses Xbox for all third party games and plans to buy a 4K TV eventually, absolutely! In the meantime we know there are automatic benefits like system-level supersampling for games that choose to target 4K.
I'm not buying an Xbox One X with the impression that devs will fine-tune things for the 1080p TV that I have in all or most cases. I'm buying in because I know Microsoft built in hardware functionality that does some of that work for them.
When will they be up for pre order?
So there are no OG Xbox, 360 or XB1 games that interest you at all? Fair enough!
It's done well so far but yeah, truly a weak ass CPU to be saddled with until the next gen.Wow are people still trying to defend the Jaguar Core? LOL
You need to face the reality, just like he Pro people needed to, that it's still a huge bottleneck.
You could have a 1080ti in there and it wouldn't matter for some games due to the egregious CPU bottleneck.
The CPU in the Pro and X is a 5 year old netbook CPU. It is AWFUL. It is anti-gaming in every way.
That's impressiveDamn. Path of Exile dev just said at xbox daily when they got the devkit they got it running at 4k/60 within 2 hours.
Damn. Path of Exile dev just said at xbox daily when they got the devkit they got it running at 4k/60 within 2 hours.
Those are good points. I have a 4K HDR TV. I'm in the situation where if I upgrade to an S, I'm guaranteed HDR titles. In effect some of what the X offers graphically, but at a much lower cost.
But if I go for an X, I'm paying a premium for the HDR and waiting for all developers to want to take advantage of the X's power. And while I wait for that, for the install base to get bigger, the price may drop and Sony may challenge.
I think what will be key is, as you say, what the hardware will handle automatically for devs, whether that's graphics or frame rate. The console has to do the work for the game, it the other way around.
Is the power button on the One X a physical one like the S?