• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Fraternity chanting the n-word

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is not about teaching these adults a lesson or trying to make them better people. These adults sung a song about lynching black people and how they weren't welcome in their group.

A university should have an atmosphere were all people are comfortable in the environment. How do you think someone would feel if their school just said "let's try redeeming them, they're not so bad" and closed the case?

I'm workplaces racism and other hurtful things are not tolerated because of the effect it has on the environment that their employees are in. It is not punishment for breaking taboos.
I'm not saying just say aww shucks. I am saying try to rehabilitate them instead of cutting then loose and just making them even more racist but quiet about it. If you can even just fix a couple of these idiots and get rid of the others it's at least worth a try right? Or are we all fucked and racism is inherent and can't be fixed. Again I'm not saying let them off about free just try to rehab first before completely expelling them. If there is no progress then cut them loose. They are still going to be known as bigots and idiots but maybe some of the could become good people.
 
What do you guys think these kids parents think of this?

Probably instilled racist values in them?

Like I said earlier, these kids are bound for corporate America, they will become our future CEOs. politicians and law enforcement. The frat will just instill in them sociopathic values through teaching them how to rape women and unapologetic racism and classism.

Fuck Greek life, it's a detrimental culture to the campus.
 
Probably instilled racist values in them?

Like I said earlier, these kids are bound for corporate America, they will become our future CEOs. politicians and law enforcement. The frat will just instill in them sociopathic values through teaching them how to rape women and unapologetic racism and classism.

Fuck Greek life, it's a detrimental culture to the campus.

Eh, we're talking about the University of Oklahoma, not Harvard or Princeton!
I do agree though, fraternity "men" are the type to end up in corporate America.
 
Since when did rule of law become based on hurt feelings?

These guys were racist assholes, fine. The fraternity was closed down and they'll suffer the consequences socially. But they shouldn't be expelled from school or even arrested (lol) just for being assholes. They were over the top, sure, But the main difference between them and the thousands of other racist assholes of all races in college was that they got caught. That's basically what society is becoming: A competition to see if you don't get caught. Everyone's an asshole, but being caught being an asshole (or being an asshole in the wrong context) ruins your life. I mean, there's a sub-community on GAF that features regular, blatant racism, gets away with it, and then has posters lecture others on how bad racism is.
 
Since when did rule of law become based on hurt feelings?

These guys were racist assholes, fine. The fraternity was closed down and they'll suffer the consequences socially. But they shouldn't be expelled from school or even arrested (lol) just for being assholes. They were over the top, sure, But the main difference between them and the thousands of other racist assholes of all races in college was that they got caught. That's basically what society is becoming: A competition to see if you don't get caught. Everyone's an asshole, but being caught being an asshole (or being an asshole in the wrong context) ruins your life. I mean, there's a sub-community on GAF that features regular, blatant racism, gets away with it, and then has posters lecture others on how bad racism is.

Which one would that be, Admiral
 
Since when did rule of law become based on hurt feelings?

These guys were racist assholes, fine. The fraternity was closed down and they'll suffer the consequences socially. But they shouldn't be expelled from school or even arrested (lol) just for being assholes.
Isn't that up to the university's administration if there happened to be a legitimate breach of their code of conduct and they ended up deeming it as such? (I don't know anything about the University of Oklahoma, though.)
 
but yahoo comments always tell me Racesium is a figment of black people imagination, and it doesnt go on any more

smh that is disgusting
 
That's not an accurate assessment. Expulsion is being presented as an "in addition to" the closing of the chapter, as opposed to "instead of." The solution cannot be worse in that manner. They will not have a "bigger chip on their shoulder," because the closing of the frat is a given.

The idea behind what I'm saying is that we know that a mob mentality pushes people to do (or not do) certain things. The racist chant (which we established did not start with those people) is part of that particular negative culture. People participate in it because the rest of their fraternity brothers participate in it. The same concept applies to why hazing still happens year after year in many places. By shutting down the chapter, you send a message, and destroy the method by which this particular part racist culture is passed along.

This pretends the sole reason these people indulged in racism and espoused views supporting institutional racism was because they were in a frat, when it's also entirely possible they were racist and supporters of institutional racism before they joined the frat (maybe that's even why they joined this frat, given we now how evidence this song isn't exactly a secret or isolated incident with SAE). Nor does shutting down the chapter preclude these people from simply joining another frat, or another chapter of the same frat, and continuing to be racists after the chapter is closed.

You're basically making every excuse under the sun for these guys, and assuming that because they or the students to follow can no longer join this particular SAE chapter, you've stopped the racist culture from propagating when you've done no such thing. You're also basically saying their racism isn't really their fault because it's caused by the frat and mob mentality, even though they're adults free to associate or not associate with racists. You're also making the error of pretending mob mentality is any sort defence for poor behaviour, when it's only ever used as a means for explaining poor behaviour, not excusing it.
 
lol

Thought you might actually be brave

I think you should take life less seriously if you think posting on a videogame message board is ever defined as "bravery."

Isn't that up to the university's administration if there happened to be a legitimate breach of their code of conduct and they ended up deeming it as such? (I don't know anything about the University of Oklahoma, though.)

Ultimately it is up to the administration, but I'm arguing that they don't need to be expelled from school simply for being assholes. They're assholes, sure, but their social consequences will be bad enough as punishment.
 
Do you honestly think any of your soft solutions will have an effect on these people?

If you truly believe these methods are soft and have no effect then you do not understand rehabilitation and education. This is a fundamental ignorance on your part.

Do you think throwing people in jail without attempting rehabilitation and offering education is a good solution to a lot of crime? If you agree then you're more aligned with my line of thought than you think. If you disagree then you have a warped sense of rehabilitation and education. I know you're not advocating they be thrown in jail, this is just a parallel with more dangerous acts.
 
I think you should take life less seriously if you think posting on a videogame message board is ever defined as "bravery."

34adbc5b_s19921_burn-sick.jpeg
 
Ultimately it is up to the administration, but I'm arguing that they don't need to be expelled from school simply for being assholes. They're assholes, sure, but their social consequences will be bad enough as punishment.
The university might also do so for their own best interest if people get angry enough. But if it turns out at all like it did for that girl from UCLA (who uploaded the YT video denigrating the Japanese people making phone calls in the library during the tsunami), they'll end up leaving on their own accord after enough harassment, anyway.
 
Just to point out one minor amendment needed in your first sentance. This is how *America* free speech works. Other countries hold different standards, and absolutely no-one on earth has completely unlimited speech all the time, so you cannot claim a sole monopoly on the idea of free speech.

In this case I think the University can expe them because the language was threatening and excluding.they were nit just using the n word or stating their views.

Their song had implications . Violation of code of conduct for sure.
 
Ultimately it is up to the administration, but I'm arguing that they don't need to be expelled from school simply for being assholes. They're assholes, sure, but their social consequences will be bad enough as punishment.

If the University deem these people not worthy of their teaching because of their unethical behavior I don't really see how that's unfair.
Also not all assholes are created equals.
I mean there's a difference between my dog poops and this
3r3CQ0H.png

What I mean is that there's "cutting the line at the cafeteria" assholes and the "kick disabled people for fun" assholes, that doesn't make them equal.
 
Please stop disrupting the thread with personal attacks and false accusations. We're trying to discuss a serious issue here.

Isn't that what you tried to do when you complained about a sub-community here, but then you were too much of a coward to actually name it?
Let's not pretend like you actually think this is a serious issue.
 
Isn't that up to the university's administration if there happened to be a legitimate breach of their code of conduct and they ended up deeming it as such? (I don't know anything about the University of Oklahoma, though.)
The whole reason this has devolved in to a First Amendment discussion is because, being a government-related body, expulsion may not be within the university's scope of punishment. If the perpetrators are eventually not expelled, there will be people ripping the university for going soft on them even though such a punishment might never have been legal in the first place.

Surprised they can just kick them off campus that fast. I can see them having their charter suspended, and the school expelling the frat, but I am surprised they can kick them out of the house in 48 hours. Doesn't it operate like a rental property where you have to give some type of reasonable notice of eviction?
I was a bit surprised at that too, but it seems the chapter house is actually owned by the university and the university is getting the displaced students alternative housing.
 
Isn't that what you tried to do when you complained about a sub-community here, but then you were too much of a coward to actually name it?
Let's not pretend like you actually think this is a serious issue.
Lol nice response.
 
Threatening to murder people in a chant is beyond what I would consider to be beyond the realm of protected speech. Is it considered protected because it's non-specific? So if I chant "let's murder black people" it's cool, but if I chant "let's murder Jeff the black guy from study hall" that's over the line? Just trying to understand the subtleties of being a racist piece of shit in today's complex world.
 
The sad part is this is an institutional chant. Its been around for a long time, and if you could look inside many people's brains in this country, you'd be shocked at how little has changed.

Of course, its barely been half a century, since all of that stuff was legally advocated at the highest offices in the country
 
Do black fraternities get lumped in with the others in anti-Greek sentiments?

Usually we do not, no. We usually end up managing many (or most) of the campus events in our communities, from social to entertainment to service...so we tend to be very well regarded. Unless the subject matter turns to hazing, we're rarely a topic of discussion. Sometimes people dislike us because the time commitment required for all the meetings, service and social events tends to pull people away from their established circle of friends. Just not enough hours in the day to hang out with everyone and the commitment has to be with the frat/sorority. That's the life commitment.
 
Yikes, "chanting the n-word" is a massive understatement. How can young people be this hateful? I shouldn't be surprised, it happens all the time, but man :/ It's so sad that this is not behavior exclusive to people on their deathbeds.
 
This pretends the sole reason these people indulged in racism and espoused views supporting institutional racism was because they were in a frat, when it's also entirely possible they were racist and supporters of institutional racism before they joined the frat (maybe that's even why they joined this frat, given we now how evidence this song isn't exactly a secret or isolated incident with SAE). Nor does shutting down the chapter preclude these people from simply joining another frat, or another chapter of the same frat, and continuing to be racists after the chapter is closed.

You're basically making every excuse under the sun for these guys, and assuming that because they or the students to follow can no longer join this particular SAE chapter, you've stopped the racist culture from propagating when you've done no such thing. You're also basically saying their racism isn't really their fault because it's caused by the frat and mob mentality, even though they're adults free to associate or not associate with racists. You're also making the error of pretending mob mentality is any sort defence for poor behaviour, when it's only ever used as a means for explaining poor behaviour, not excusing it.

I'm not excusing anything. The fact is that fraternities tend to foster a certain group mentality. In another frat, they could be the same racist person, sure. But ideally that other frat wouldn't accept that behavior. This in turn stifles that sort of thought.

Ever heard the saying (and I'm paraphrasing) "show me a man's friends and I can tell you who they are?" That is very, very true. Sure, they could all just be completely racist to begin with. But that behavior was being facilitated by the people that they were around in that fraternity. In some frats, the group mentality is used for good - community service, social justice, etc. In this particular case, it was toxic. That's the reasoning for shutting down the frat. How these people behave as individuals afterwards is another matter. Hopefully that involves them not perpetuating racism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom