• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

KeplerL2: PlayStation handheld reportedly with 24GB memory, PS6 console with 30GB

Prediction: Next gen will start in 2028 and this is what they will be doing:

PS6 (home console) - 600€
PS6 Portable (play natively everything the PS6 can play) - 400€
PS6 Portal (they won't name it PS2 Portal...they will keep the 6 for this one since people already know what Portal stands for) - 200€

Keeping the naming simple and clear, like they have always done.

3 different entry points for their ecosystem for different prices.
a bit low for the portable but otherwise I agree on everything
 
Prediction: Next gen will start in 2028 and this is what they will be doing:

PS6 (home console) - 600€
PS6 Portable (play natively everything the PS6 can play) - 400€
PS6 Portal (they won't name it PS2 Portal...they will keep the 6 for this one since people already know what Portal stands for) - 200€

Keeping the naming simple and clear, like they have always done.

3 different entry points for their ecosystem for different prices.
Thats good to be tru but the Portable can be 500$, The switch costs 450$
 
Last edited:
Going to be much worse "next-gen" cause a lot of big budget AAA games are likely going to opt for full path tracing which is exponentially more expensive than the halfass heavily downgraded RT features PS5 games use.
You are doing the balance sheet from the wrong starting point IMHO.

A lot of big budget AAA games are likely going to opt for a native resolution (960x)540p with PT by the time they are making native ps6 games, meaning the effective use of the new PT hardware will be x4 more effective and the memory requirements for ML AI PT denoising will be smaller when performed at 540p native, with the subsequent PSSR2 upsampling providing the illusion of full PT quality around a native 1080p level and combined into a 4K quality for the raster visuals, so if anything things are going to be much better for RT/PT two or three years into next-gen IMO.
 
I agree with your points, but the base model can't be $800 to have a chance of succeeding. The hardware needs to be put into as many hands as possible, and making it more than the Pro doesn't make sense as they'll be losing too many sales. Releasing a Pro close to the base, or even at the same time might be an option but the PS6 will be delayed further if they can't target $600.

It's Nintendo's problem with Switch 2, and in the past the price would have fallen over time, but that's not a given any more.
Its a problem with US dollar, ppl in power want and keep it extremly weak, dont look at those 800$ like it was 600$ back in 2006 at ps3 launch, if ps6 launches holidays 2027 then those 800$ will have so lil value going forward sony will likely have to even rise ps6 price in a year or two.

I see usd has crazy low value now and some1 at the top working overtime to make it even less valueable in future, as proof i present u conversion over the years of currency of my country polish zloty(pln).
Mind u our economy sux and going from feb 2022 we are only country that has border with all 3- russia, bellarus(aka direct russia's proxy with tons of russian army stationed there) and ukraine- dont have to explain what it means ;X

And thats how pln to usd ratio was over the years:
Back at ps3 launch(so 600$) 1 usd end of nov 2006 was about 2,98pln
Now over 19years later it turns out weak polish currency(especially given major conflict right at our border) its: 1usd= 3,56pln so basically usd currency devalued itself at almost same rate over those 19 years...
We talking top1 economy in the world, with top1 military power/say in the world, something doesnt add up here, either poland is wakanda in disguise(despite being 99% white ;P )with our hidden tech/resources potential or current usd is crazy weak vs what it should be :messenger_tears_of_joy:
 
Again with this?

1st party: you own the IP
2nd party: you fund the development but own nothing and get some kind of exclusivity deal
3rd party: you don't do shit

1st party: you fund the general production expenses, oversee the project, and publish the title (there are virtually no examples of a publisher funding a game and not publishing it for that máster)
3rd party: you don't do shit

That's how it is, Sony only reports software revenue between first-party and third-party, and the stuff you consider second-party goes to the former. Let's not derail the thread any more, especially with concepts that you do not understand.


You're both right. nial nial you just ignored situations like Game Freak developping Pokémon exclusively for Nintendo while Nintendo doesn't technically own the IP. Same with Smash Bros, developped by Sora (+ Bandai Namco) or Kirby games (co-owned by Hal Laboratory).
 
That is a lot of memory.
And games will still have loading screens. especially the 3rd party indy games.
2GB to download the entire game. Yet Loading screens every level on a machine with 10 times the memory.
PlayStation could move to using a lot less memory and games would end up getting better as a result.
E.g., the PS2 has 36MB of memory and Rockstar got GTA San Andreas to work without any real load screens once it starts.
Initial load times at boot are understandable and in-game load times are unacceptable.
 
Apparently what you are asking is impossible, even RTX60xx or Titan wont have what you asking for .. and both will be in the thousands $$$

Be realistic
Being realistic you can't ask for a 16x RAM pool and 10x power jump like in previous generations. The underlying technology hasn't advanced that much and is turning itself smarter to compensate for that. And that is obviously reflected in the products made with said technology. But the 160bits bus is just cheap.

The way I see it there are two possible outcomes:
- The IA bubbles burst before November 2027: Magnus (assuming it has at least the option of a console OS) will be the more compelling choice and PS6 will be looked at as the anchor, the Series S of its generation.
- The IA bubbles doesn't burst before November 2027: then PS6 is the only system in the market that makes sense. While PS6 is priced like a 400€ from 2013 + inflation (probably 550 without disk) everybody else is trying to sell Maseratis to minimal wage Japanese office workers. But I give this scenario a 5% chance of happening. Magnus (assuming it has at least the option of a console OS) will be the shit to have. (Assuming it has at least the option of a console OS).
 
Last edited:
PlayStation could move to using a lot less memory and games would end up getting better as a result.
E.g., the PS2 has 36MB of memory and Rockstar got GTA San Andreas to work without any real load screens once it starts.
Initial load times at boot are understandable and in-game load times are unacceptable.
No, PS2 had 32MB and 4MBVRAM, GTA5 on PS3 was more impressive what they did with 256MB of MAIN RAM
 
Last edited:
a bit low for the portable but otherwise I agree on everything

Thats good to be tru but the Portable can be 500$, The switch costs 450$
Switch 2 is a hybrid console. I'm sure it's always going to cost more. That said the hardware is also weaker and cheaper do produce so...who knows.

I based those 400€ on two things:
- Sony is more willing to lose money on each unit sold than Nintendo. I really don't believe Switch 2 costs nearly as much to produce as they are selling it for. (i mean this for day one sales, now i'm not sure)
- Sounds weird for Sony to price a portable for 500€ and its home console for 600. Only 100 bucks separating both? hum
 
Its a problem with US dollar, ppl in power want and keep it extremly weak, dont look at those 800$ like it was 600$ back in 2006 at ps3 launch, if ps6 launches holidays 2027 then those 800$ will have so lil value going forward sony will likely have to even rise ps6 price in a year or two.

I see usd has crazy low value now and some1 at the top working overtime to make it even less valueable in future, as proof i present u conversion over the years of currency of my country polish zloty(pln).
Mind u our economy sux and going from feb 2022 we are only country that has border with all 3- russia, bellarus(aka direct russia's proxy with tons of russian army stationed there) and ukraine- dont have to explain what it means ;X

And thats how pln to usd ratio was over the years:
Back at ps3 launch(so 600$) 1 usd end of nov 2006 was about 2,98pln
Now over 19years later it turns out weak polish currency(especially given major conflict right at our border) its: 1usd= 3,56pln so basically usd currency devalued itself at almost same rate over those 19 years...
We talking top1 economy in the world, with top1 military power/say in the world, something doesnt add up here, either poland is wakanda in disguise(despite being 99% white ;P )with our hidden tech/resources potential or current usd is crazy weak vs what it should be :messenger_tears_of_joy:
That doesn't really matter for their biggest market though. It would still be $800 in the US, and more than the Pro is at the moment.

I personally don't think think there's any way PS6 sells at $800 and if it does Sony would be expecting weak sales.
 
Native resolutions are dead, why would bandwidth matter? PSSR3 & FSR5 will likely be out come launch (Late 2027?) No reason to not use heavy upscaling at this point.
 
That doesn't really matter for their biggest market though. It would still be $800 in the US, and more than the Pro is at the moment.

I personally don't think think there's any way PS6 sells at $800 and if it does Sony would be expecting weak sales.
Was 299usd back in 1995(so psx launch) expensive or cheap back then coz it was pretty cheap, we got proof of that even here:

U can tell by the reaction 299$ was considered bargain bin price.
And when u quickly put it into inflation calc, 299$ in 1995 is 635$ today, now we are still almost 2years away from holiday 2027 launch, usd will keep losing value all that time, and it will keep losing even more after that...
 
The way I see it there are two possible outcomes:
- The IA bubbles burst before November 2027: Magnus (assuming it has at least the option of a console OS) will be the more compelling choice and PS6 will be looked at as the anchor, the Series S of its generation.
Did you really just equate the PS6 to the Xbox Series S, and Magnus to a PS5?
Come on.

Is Magnus three times the GPU power? No.

What we're looking at—if these specs are even final—is a gap closer to the PS4 vs Xbox One era, something in the 25–30% range on paper, before accounting for custom hardware decisions from either Sony or Microsoft. And as history shows, Sony tends to squeeze a lot out of their designs.
 
Last edited:
Prediction: Next gen will start in 2028 and this is what they will be doing:

PS6 (home console) - 600€
PS6 Portable (play natively everything the PS6 can play) - 400€
PS6 Portal (they won't name it PS2 Portal...they will keep the 6 for this one since people already know what Portal stands for) - 200€

Keeping the naming simple and clear, like they have always done.

3 different entry points for their ecosystem for different prices.
How the hell are they going to make something more powerful than a PS5 Pro for less? At best they're gonna match the same price. Same thing for the handheld, no way they're gonna be cheaper than Nintendo. A realistic target to me would be same price as the Steam Deck 512GB model .
 
Prediction: Next gen will start in 2028 and this is what they will be doing:

PS6 (home console) - 600€
PS6 Portable (play natively everything the PS6 can play) - 400€
PS6 Portal (they won't name it PS2 Portal...they will keep the 6 for this one since people already know what Portal stands for) - 200€

Keeping the naming simple and clear, like they have always done.

3 different entry points for their ecosystem for different prices.
Since they say longer than people think, I bet 2029 or even 2030 for next gen.
 
Was 299usd back in 1995(so psx launch) expensive or cheap back then coz it was pretty cheap, we got proof of that even here:

U can tell by the reaction 299$ was considered bargain bin price.
And when u quickly put it into inflation calc, 299$ in 1995 is 635$ today, now we are still almost 2years away from holiday 2027 launch, usd will keep losing value all that time, and it will keep losing even more after that...


It will go up and inflation is one of the reasons why we get these increases, but not above the Pro price. That would be suicide from Sony and I'm sure they'll be targeting $600 to avoid a huge dropoff.
 
How the hell are they going to make something more powerful than a PS5 Pro for less? At best they're gonna match the same price. Same thing for the handheld, no way they're gonna be cheaper than Nintendo. A realistic target to me would be same price as the Steam Deck 512GB model .

By taking less margins? Or even small loss.
 
Native resolutions are dead, why would bandwidth matter? PSSR3 & FSR5 will likely be out come launch (Late 2027?) No reason to not use heavy upscaling at this point.
Yes and we still has terrible IQ, FSR is piece of shit
kRFWI0Q83GJKyHCn.png
 
Did you really just equate the PS6 to the Xbox Series S, and Magnus to a PS5?
Come on.

Is Magnus three times the GPU power? No.

What we're looking at—if these specs are even final—is a gap closer to the PS4 vs Xbox One era, something in the 25–30% range on paper, before accounting for custom hardware decisions from either Sony or Microsoft. And as history shows, Sony tends to squeeze a lot out of their designs.
Even a One vs PS4 is a bad outcome. Remember how that ended…

OT: Christ, I swear the iPhone keyboard is getting worse by the minute!!
 
Its a problem with US dollar, ppl in power want and keep it extremly weak, dont look at those 800$ like it was 600$ back in 2006 at ps3 launch, if ps6 launches holidays 2027 then those 800$ will have so lil value going forward sony will likely have to even rise ps6 price in a year or two.

I see usd has crazy low value now and some1 at the top working overtime to make it even less valueable in future, as proof i present u conversion over the years of currency of my country polish zloty(pln).
Mind u our economy sux and going from feb 2022 we are only country that has border with all 3- russia, bellarus(aka direct russia's proxy with tons of russian army stationed there) and ukraine- dont have to explain what it means ;X

And thats how pln to usd ratio was over the years:
Back at ps3 launch(so 600$) 1 usd end of nov 2006 was about 2,98pln
Now over 19years later it turns out weak polish currency(especially given major conflict right at our border) its: 1usd= 3,56pln so basically usd currency devalued itself at almost same rate over those 19 years...
We talking top1 economy in the world, with top1 military power/say in the world, something doesnt add up here, either poland is wakanda in disguise(despite being 99% white ;P )with our hidden tech/resources potential or current usd is crazy weak vs what it should be :messenger_tears_of_joy:

Taking two models - I know the PS3 was an outlier, but look at how it did relative to its price today adjusted for Inflation.

ModelLaunch YearLaunch PricePrice Adjusted for Inflation (2026)
PS32006$599$950
PS5 Pro2024$699$735
 
Even a One vs PS4 is a bad outcome. Remember how that ended…

OT: Christ, I swear the iPhone keyboard is getting worse by the minute!!

I feel you, man. I've got the Fold 7, and I still can't adjust to the screen being just a bit narrower. Even that tiny change throws everything off.
 
High end gpus released in 2022 will be more powerful than a console that will last until 2035. I expected a bit more than 2x Ram and x3gpu..
You're living in the past. The PS4 has x16 ram compared to the PS3. The PS5 only has x2 ram compared to the PS4.

Which aged worse? The PS5 gives a much better relative gaming experience in 2026 than the PS4 did in 2019.

We don't need ram to increase by massive multiples anymore.
 
How the hell are they going to make something more powerful than a PS5 Pro for less? At best they're gonna match the same price. Same thing for the handheld, no way they're gonna be cheaper than Nintendo. A realistic target to me would be same price as the Steam Deck 512GB model .
PS5 Pro isn't nearly as expensive to make as its price leads you to believe. Sony simply saw a market that would buy that console while using its gains to cut some losses the slim version is having.
They have mentioned that they make money from the PS5 Pro unlike the slim version. One was priced for the overall public. The other wasn't.

About Switch 2, why are we behaving like Switch 2 is just portable console? As far as i know they weren't losing money with each unit sold when the console came out. Sony is usually the one that loses some money at first and it offsets that loss with all the other Playstation services they have. Nintendo doesn't do this as much. And Valve? Do they have services like PS Plus that they can use to do that? They probably price everything so they don't love money and maybe even make some.

If PS6 Portable is 500 bucks, there's no way the home console is 600 then. It will be around 700 bucks lol.
 
PS5 Pro isn't nearly as expensive to make as its price leads you to believe. Sony simply saw a market that would buy that console while using its gains to cut some losses the slim version is having.
They have mentioned that they make money from the PS5 Pro unlike the slim version. One was priced for the overall public. The other wasn't.

About Switch 2, why are we behaving like Switch 2 is just portable console? As far as i know they weren't losing money with each unit sold when the console came out. Sony is usually the one that loses some money at first and it offsets that loss with all the other Playstation services they have. Nintendo doesn't do this as much. And Valve? Do they have services like PS Plus that they can use to do that? They probably price everything so they don't love money and maybe even make some.

If PS6 Portable is 500 bucks, there's no way the home console is 600 then. It will be around 700 bucks lol.
yeah them pushing out a region locked version for 100 bucks less is the biggest proof they are not taking any losses with switch 2
 
We all know for Nintendo such specs are science fiction. Thanks God we are not talking of Nintendo.

lol settle down little warrior, fanboyism has nothing to do it.

Unless there a massive turn around in ram prices in the next 2 years there is no way this will happen.
 
lol settle down little warrior, fanboyism has nothing to do it.

Unless there a massive turn around in ram prices in the next 2 years there is no way this will happen.
are you willing to bet $200 with me it wont happen? since you are so sure

get some mod to approve it and lets run it my friend
 
How about quote me and point out where specifically i was wrong then?
Or u aknowledge my train of thought is very logical and despite that u just wanted to post edgy gif? That can happen too so i dont blame u, but lets stick to facts here :P
Ok, sure,

I very much doubt it will be $800 ($600 - $700 maybe)
performance will be a priority (always is)
bandwidth reduction? (it isnt even reduced compared to this gen, but with the architecture they are going for it wont be an issue at all)
TF is not a good way to determine performance (I thought this was known for a long time?)
You are nuts if you think this will be anywhere close the the performance issues the Wii had (as in, nowhere near the level of performance other platforms have in the same gen, or issues with it being unbalanced, or as you put it 'weaksauce')
It wont have 'tons of compromises' (what do you even mean by this? what compromises are you expecting?)

People did this last gen with the PS5 (and the PS4, and PS3 to a degree) turned out great from a performance standpoint at launch, was funny to see DF getting things totally wrong and jumping to conclusions, they never learn
 
PS5 Pro isn't nearly as expensive to make as its price leads you to believe. Sony simply saw a market that would buy that console while using its gains to cut some losses the slim version is having.
They have mentioned that they make money from the PS5 Pro unlike the slim version. One was priced for the overall public. The other wasn't.

About Switch 2, why are we behaving like Switch 2 is just portable console? As far as i know they weren't losing money with each unit sold when the console came out. Sony is usually the one that loses some money at first and it offsets that loss with all the other Playstation services they have. Nintendo doesn't do this as much. And Valve? Do they have services like PS Plus that they can use to do that? They probably price everything so they don't love money and maybe even make some.

If PS6 Portable is 500 bucks, there's no way the home console is 600 then. It will be around 700 bucks lol.
Indeed. And I don't see how PS6 would be less expensive than PS5 Pro current price (750$). I am expecting it to cost between 799$ and 999$.

And PS5 Pro has only 16 GB of GDDR6. There is a reason Sony want to extend PS5's lifecycle to be as long as PS4 (12 years). They know most customers will need a cheaper price point than the cost of a PS6.
 
Again with this?

1st party: you own the IP
2nd party: you fund the development but own nothing and get some kind of exclusivity deal
3rd party: you don't do shit
There are different types of 3rd party. 3rd party timed exclusives could have marketing deals, reduced licensing fees, or just a payment though some are absolutely do nothing and earn 30%.
 
Ok, sure,

I very much doubt it will be $800 ($600 - $700 maybe)
performance will be a priority (always is)
bandwidth reduction? (it isnt even reduced compared to this gen, but with the architecture they are going for it wont be an issue at all)
TF is not a good way to determine performance (I thought this was known for a long time?)
You are nuts if you think this will be anywhere close the the performance issues the Wii had (as in, nowhere near the level of performance other platforms have in the same gen, or issues with it being unbalanced, or as you put it 'weaksauce')
It wont have 'tons of compromises' (what do you even mean by this? what compromises are you expecting?)

People did this last gen with the PS5 (and the PS4, and PS3 to a degree) turned out great from a performance standpoint at launch, was funny to see DF getting things totally wrong and jumping to conclusions, they never learn
I said it wont be like wii(jump from gcn to wii was almost non existant, there are videos of that on yt), more like n64 to gcn jump.
Performance cant be priority when u got hard powerdraw limit of 160W while for example ps5 pr0 has hard limit of 240W from the wall. Hell base ps5 from holidays 2020 has well over 200W powerlimit too :)
Keeping it affordable enough will likely be priority, aka keeping it in line with 300$ psx from 95, aka likely around 800$ in 2028( they cant make it 599$ launch price holidays 2027 only to bump it by 100$ in 2028 and another 100$ by 2030, no? ;P)
 
Indeed. And I don't see how PS6 would be less expensive than PS5 Pro current price (750$). I am expecting it to cost between 799$ and 999$.

And PS5 Pro has only 16 GB of GDDR6. There is a reason Sony want to extend PS5's lifecycle to be as long as PS4 (12 years). They know most customers will need a cheaper price point than the cost of a PS6.
Sony would never release their new console for that price. To do that they wouldn't have a single PS6 release exclusive, not even on the same level as Demon's Souls.
They would rather wait until 2028/2020 to release the console and have it cheaper then.
That said...they will cover some of those costs. They have quite a lot of money from other services and they are still trying to have their PS4 userbase to move on to PS5 in 2026. Releasing another console next year makes no sense to me.
 
Since I think that a) the PS5 still has some untapped power left and b) I just don't wish Playstation hardware to leave affordibility at release.
People still have this 90s mentality where consoles had "untapped" power. We're in 2026. What untapped power do you think there is left when we got games dropping to 720p using DRS to maintain 60fps?
 
People still have this 90s mentality where consoles had "untapped" power. We're in 2026. What untapped power do you think there is left when we got games dropping to 720p using DRS to maintain 60fps?
Fanboys are not gonna agree with you lol
 
Top Bottom