Topher
Identifies as young
SteamOS isn't as open as you think it is. It's like Android, open in name only, not practicality for the average user.
Wrong. Linux is completely open. Steam OS is Linux.
SteamOS isn't as open as you think it is. It's like Android, open in name only, not practicality for the average user.
Average user.....Wrong. Linux is completely open. Steam OS is Linux.
Not sure if Jez has been told this or just his assumptions but I am leaning towards someone has told him to put this info out there
"As such, Xbox Helix will be the most open Xbox ever. You'll be able to boot up the Windows Desktop from here, and install other PC stores such as Steam, Epic Games, GOG, Riot Client, Battle.net, and much more"
https://www.windowscentral.com/gami...asha-sharma-re-affirms-new-xbox-is-on-the-way
Check die size on cpu + gpu.
GPU is similar to rtx5070 in size. CPU is like a ryzen 7 processor.
Add extra costs for node shrink etc.
Seems like it can be priced at 1200 even with profit margin etc.
Only question is, if die shrink can reach 5080 level of performance. Considering how much AMD is banking on RDNA 5, I think it should be capable of.
The games running on the device are not Linux native binaries. They are windows games run via a translation layer.Wrong. Linux is completely open. Steam OS is Linux.
Exactly. Average user is computer illiterate.Average user.....
![]()
I am tired already.The only thing I know 100% from this thread, console wars are back on the menu...
![]()
If Jason Ronald is involved it would be gimped somehow. Like how Series S has affected some releases for the Series X.Which may mean Xbox light become the lead platform to develop on for a while, which can only be a good thing.
Sharma done more in a couple of week, than Bond did in years
[h3][/h3]
\![]()
It's either 9070 tops and not 5080 raster with 5090 RT.
But, I guess we'll see.
If Jason Ronald is involved it would be gimped somehow. Like how Series S has affected some releases for the Series X.
What does that have to do with that I said?
I admit.....I'm being very hard-headed about all of this. @HeisenbergFX4 can attest to that. I'd say I have good reason. These are the same people who tried to tell the world that a gotdang phone was an "Xbox". Same folks who slapped their "Xbox" logo on a Windows PC handheld and insisted it was an "Xbox". Now Microsoft is saying this multi-store device that sounds awfully like just another PC is actually a "console". Sorry, but Microsoft has cried wolf too many times to take their words at face value, in my mind.
I've said before, I don't listen to what Microsoft says for this very reason (among others). When they show what this actually is then I'll know. Until then, I'll be stubborn, and maybe even a little pedantic. That's on Microsoft.
"Just four games"
Because they have their own living room box coming and a SteamOS they want to push with it. Why would they aide the Microsoft store more-so and undercut their own box?Why wouldn't they?
It's easy money for them, just like they get from any other PC on the planet
Nothing is exclusive to steam. You can run lutris or heroic or whatever you want with the steam proton layer. Which btw is not even the most advanced one. Because other proton layers (like protonGE for example) can just take the steam proton layer and add stuff to it.Compare that to Xbox Full Screen Experience features on handhelds that will apply systemwide like Default Profiles or Advanced Shader Delivery. When MS creates windows APIs, they are available to everyone and their mothers.
Google before the anti trust, created APIs that were linked specifically to Playstore and Play Services, that's why Amazon app store could never succeed. Android is open in name only.
Correct me If I'm wrong as I don't use it but Epic and other storefronts would use Lutris right? Not the advanced version of Proton that Steam has. Basically SteamOS created APIs on top of an open platform that are exclusive to their store and games.
What does that have to do with that I said?
We are talking price here, Adam.
Probably limited online only release into "Tier 1" countries.I guess they will just be selling these through their own store?
I can't imagine too many places would be willing to stock a $1000+ machine. Especially off the back of being unable to shift (much, much cheaper) Xbox Series consoles.
Correct me If I'm wrong as I don't use it but Epic and other storefronts would use Lutris right? Not the advanced version of Proton that Steam has. Basically SteamOS created APIs on top of an open platform that are exclusive to their store and games.
Exactly. Average user is computer illiterate.
![]()
Because they have their own living room box coming and a SteamOS they want to push with it. Why would they aide the Microsoft store more-so and undercut their own box?
I'm not the person you need to be replying to. Tell @vaibhavpisal
Edit: Better yet....
@vaibhavpisal tell him he is wrong
Their own box will be much cheaper for starters
I don't see them excluding a Windows Device, like they didn't exclude the fake "Xbox" ROG Ally while having Steam Deck to sell
Their own box will be much cheaper for starters
I don't see them excluding a Windows Device, like they didn't exclude the fake Xbox ROG Ally while having Steam Deck to sell
It's a fight for mindshare and once again, Valve wants to push their SteamOS adoption.Their own box will be much cheaper for starters
I don't see them excluding a Windows Device, like they didn't exclude the fake "Xbox" ROG Ally while having Steam Deck to sell
Depends on POV.
Steam Machine is a pc with a relatively locked ecosystem.
Xbox Helix is a console with open marketplace.
I see xbox as more open. I don't want to make changes to steam box. Its counterproductive to what the system is.
My man, stop pulling shit out from your ass. It's not because of Pete Hines request, delusional.They can't do it for ABK games, especially COD until at least 2038. Bethesda will get annoyed if they're forced to do it. Pete Hines asked why ABK games got to remain multi platform but not Bethesda. That's when MS started changing strategies.
Really all this comes back to whether it is an open Windows PC, like Rog Xbox Ally, or not. The question is if it isn't and MS needs Valve to opt-in then will they? If Xbox is just a PC then it doesn't matter.
They will sell the hardware at a profit. No money lost.
I don't see much difference: Microsoft WANTS Steam, Steam has no reason to say no....
So in the end: Who cares?
The games running on the device are not Linux native binaries. They are windows games run via a translation layer.
So in order to accomplish that, Steam integrated Proton into their backend. There are certain features and APIs that are exclusive to Steam games only if I'm not mistaken. Like the shader compilation and Hardware Optimization Profiles.
Compare that to Xbox Full Screen Experience features on handhelds that will apply systemwide like Default Profiles or Advanced Shader Delivery. When MS creates windows APIs, they are available to everyone and their mothers.
Google before the anti trust, created APIs that were linked specifically to Playstore and Play Services, that's why Amazon app store could never succeed. Android is open in name only.
Correct me If I'm wrong as I don't use it but Epic and other storefronts would use Lutris right? Not the advanced version of Proton that Steam has. Basically SteamOS created APIs on top of an open platform that are exclusive to their store and games.
Exactly. Average user is computer illiterate.
Bring the xbox boys on board?so what's even the point?
As I said before, I don't agree that Valve has no reason to say no, but we will see
I don't really buy the idea that Microsoft is "throwing customers a bone." What makes more sense is that the hybrid PC‑console space is still largely untapped, and Microsoft actually has a better chance of succeeding there than continuing the traditional console war they've been losing ground in for years.imo this is a 50/50 chance of ever releasing. But, if it does release, I think this is Xbox washing their hands of hardware, here's why:
This is Xbox throwing their large library customers one last bone, here's an open platform pc, with a bluray drive and chip to play Xbox games. Yea it's expensive cause it's not subsidized with xbox functionality. Take it or leave it. We're done.
They put Steam on every Windows device on the planet, why should this one be any different?
Bring the xbox boys on board?
Dude....we are going in circles. Let's move on
So the next Xbox is basically just a PC with an Xbox sticker on it that can run older Xbox games through emulation?
Honestly...its the most logical thing for them to do. Why trying to fuck around with two different "ecosystems" when only one is really needed.
People put Steam on every Windows device with a client Valve provides. If it's just Windows, then yea, Steam is there for anyone to download... if it's a custom OS, then it can still happen, but would undermine Valves own gaming OS goals, me thinks. Valve has a vested interest to grow Linux gaming, not shrink it.They put Steam on every Windows device on the planet, why should this one be any different?
And a standard BluRay add on wouldn't work in a Windows environment?It would need one if they plan on people retaining their physical Xbox library. *
* We're asking if it will come with a disc drive or not in the first place.
The issue is Microsoft doesn't get the 30% cut on sales. And the need to pay for multiplayer also goes out the window. How exactly is Microsoft benefiting?Honestly...its the most logical thing for them to do. Why trying to fuck around with two different "ecosystems" when only one is really needed.
And a standard BluRay add on wouldn't work in a Windows environment?
People put Steam on every Windows device with a client Valve provides. If it's just Windows, then yea, Steam is there for anyone to download... if it's a custom OS, then it can still happen, but would undermine Valves own gaming OS goals, me thinks.
Looks like it's gonna be a great streaming machine + some Xbox exclusives games
Oh, Gears 2 and 3 are not on PC yet, nor the Xbox 360 games.What Xbox exclusives???
They are a third-party publisher now....
They also dont get a cut now, because no one wants the windows store (for very good reasons). And are you begging to pay for online gaming? This shit has to go anyway.The issue is Microsoft doesn't get the 30% cut on sales. And the need to pay for multiplayer also goes out the window. How exactly is Microsoft benefiting?