So you don't read Anandtech because you believe a poster talking out his arse.
No, his reasons are perfectly valid; we'll get a more accurate comparison once AMD's new chips come out later this year (or early next).
I'd also like to address the "faster chips due to smaller process" points too: smaller processes don't magically make a chip faster, but rather
allow for faster clocks/processes due to
completely indirect effects. I like to make the analogy of "headroom" (for threshold voltages, frequencies, tracing/race conditions, etc) such that the designer can tweak various parts of the chip for more performance. I actually teach a course related to process tech and manufacturing too...
Speaking of processes, the more exciting news of today is Intel's new Quark chip --
that's the new ARM competitor if the price is right.