Haven't Sony stated that their new machine won't be enough for 4k gaming?
Anyway I seriously doubt we'll see any of that. At least I seriously doubt it.
Same goes for Microsoft's Scorpio. If anyone will come out with a 4k game it will have to Microsoft themselves. That isn't cheap ya know. That isn't easy. It'll take time.
Also I'm not sure I want the industry to even try, yet. I have already come to terms that the AAA bullshit is here to stay, killing of smaller B-A production games. I don't want to kill that segment completely.
Really hope Microsoft can show 4k@60fps with forza 7 and halo 6 next year.
I'm pretty sure even a console can do 4k 60fps, some developer will still do something like make native res higher or add some pointless effect to make it only able to do 30fps, because there are developers that think their game doesn't need 60fps.
I need to hear AAA Developers say "we're gonna be developing games for a optimal 1080p 60fps experiance" before i buy Scorpio, If its going to be 4k sub60 drops for the majority then i'm afraid i'm out! 60 fps is key for me!
I'm a PC gamer rocking a 1080p screen, but their assumption that I'm not interested in 4K is flat out wrong.
The problem is, I'd have to pay £400ish for a good 4K monitor, another £400 for a graphics card that could push out at 4K resolution, and even that a lot of games would struggle.
I'm being patient and waiting for the hardware to be there to handle 4K easily, then I'll jump in.
How close to the TV would I need to be to notice a difference between 1080 and 4k?
How close to the TV would I need to be to notice a difference between 1080 and 4k?
PC gamers will gladly go to 4k whenever the majority of the monitors are closer to the $250-300 range, and the required cards for them are likewise in that midrange price point.
It's all Marketing, I would wager most 3rd party are going to add bells and whistles to 1080/60
How close to the TV would I need to be to notice a difference between 1080 and 4k?
What the chart shows is that, for a 84-inch screen, 4k resolution isnt fully apparent until you are at least 5.5 feet or closer to the screen.
See the following:
https://carltonbale.com/does-4k-resolution-matter/
I wonder if people pushing for true 4k have even considered the implications on file sizes.
Quantum break had about 10 4k cutscenes no more than 20 mins in length.
On top of 44gb game install, you had to download 73gb extra data. For cutscenes.
I hope with this 6tf system, it has 4tb hard drives built in.
I wonder if people pushing for true 4k have even considered the implications on file sizes.
Quantum break had about 10 4k cutscenes no more than 20 mins in length.
On top of 44gb game install, you had to download 75gb extra data. For cutscenes.
I hope with this 6tf system, it has 4tb hard drives built in.
I don't want another halo 5 situation where they have to make lots of sacrifices to hit 60fps. I would prefer an amazing looking 1080/60 for halo. Forza on the other hand...
pretty sure they are just using 4k as a buzzword to make it apparent to the gaming public that Scorpio is super duper powerful and that they will not be losing the resolution warz anymore once it comes out.
It's time they start giving us options on how we want to play the games. I'd go for 1080p 60fps over 4K 30fps 99% of the time, personally.
This thread doesn't bode well for Phil's Scorpio message but maybe he can do a Greenberg, games output on your TV at 4K. Hopefully devs outside of Microsoft at least fall on the non 4K side.