SneakersSO
Member
MS can make Marvel vs Killer Instinct.
I know its a joke, but this would be a licensing nightmare to get done. If MvC4 can't happen due to licensing, this certainly wouldn't be possible
MS can make Marvel vs Killer Instinct.
Nope. There isn't one. But I don't even want a fighting game out of this initiative. It's been done. Games with great stories that are repsentative of their characters would be great.
Everyone is really hung up on the idea of a Marvel fighting game.
Go back one page & you'll see why that won't happen.I'd love an X-men RPG.
But this is pretty huge for Sony. And Insomniac for that matter.
Nope. There isn't one. But I don't even want a fighting game out of this initiative. It's been done. Games with great stories that are repsentative of their characters would be great.
Everyone is really hung up on the idea of a Marvel fighting game.
And most importantly, make an exception to that stupid-ass ban for Capcom. I mean, Capcom could technically go for the license, but they've been playing things too safe for their own good as of late. They need to take a few risks every once-in-a-while, & MvC4 would be a risk worth taking.I just cant wrap my head around the idea that all that talk and there is NO plan for a new Marvel vs Capcom.
I just cannot. That series has a HUGE legacy. It dominated the FGC with pure HYPE for so many years. It can still generate insanely good moments in the tournaments. I do not get it.
Give Capcom the budget, the overseeing, whatever they need, but please, realize that a genius FGC is more recognition, respect and - obviously - brand power than any random game could ever be.
I hope publisheres all around the world will start considering financing these types of projects purely for fame and respect (which strengthens, not erodes the brand). Obviously, you need to be in a good financial shape for that, but if anyone, Marvel can do it.
In an interview about the upcoming Spider-Man, they said they look at everything that Spider-Man appeared in (Merchandise, Comics, Movies, cartoons....)
Anyone else like the idea of Obsidian doing a RPG game, maybe avengers (as x-men is a nogo) or something?
MVC4 pls
Im not sure exactly what this means for MVC, i wonder how they view capcom, it always feels like they're really passionate about marvel.
Come on marvel, i beg of you, please, MVC4!
Welcome to the Mahvel Army, my friends.fixed.
What could they do? Disney doesn't want to publish console/PC games anymore. It's not like Activision could put out great Spider-man games. That and they (Marvel) went to Sony to talk about a potential Spider-Man project. Marvel also wanted Spider-Man to be treated as if it was a First-Party IP/title.
Sony Pictures and Sony Interactive Entertainment do operate independently. That's why the previous Spider-Man games were licensed to different developers and multi-platform. I understand Marvel and Disney seeking publisher and developer deals, but making it exclusive to one platform is bad business.
Should capcom really make mvc4? Casuals hate them. I think NRS should make MK vs marvel. With tons of sp content and stiff gameplay. Also most capcom heroes were masks so face design/ animation won't be hard for NRS this time lol.
NRS already has DC, so I don't think they would work with Marvel. And if Capcom really focuses on filling the game with content, they may be able to get past the backlash towards SFV's lack of content at launch.Should capcom really make mvc4? Casuals hate them. I think NRS should make MK vs marvel. With tons of sp content and stiff gameplay. Also most capcom heroes were masks so face design/ animation won't be hard for NRS this time lol.
Pretty much, yeah.Isn't NRS a wholly owned subsidiary of WB now?
Doesn't seem like they would have a vested interest in working with Marvel properties.
Sony Pictures and Sony Interactive Entertainment do operate independently. That's why the previous Spider-Man games were licensed to different developers and multi-platform. I understand Marvel and Disney seeking publisher and developer deals, but making it exclusive to one platform is bad business.
From Software. Iron Man.
I don't really see Obsidian doing this as they don't seem to have a good working relationship with other publishers. They're very much a "We'll work on it until it's done" studio, which has seemingly annoyed previous partners.
My understanding of this Marvel deal is they're trying to work with publishers and studios, not publishing any game themselves.
That depends on if they lift the infamous X-Men/F4 ban anytime soon. But knowing Ike Perlmutter, I wouldn't get your hopes up.Good shit Marvel. Hopefully this will also lead to more Marvel games like X-Men returning.
I just cant wrap my head around the idea that all that talk and there is NO plan for a new Marvel vs Capcom.
I just cannot.That series has a HUGE legacy. It dominated the FGCwith pure HYPE for so many years. It can still generate insanely good moments in the tournaments. I do not get it.
Give Capcom the budget, the overseeing, whatever they need, but please, realize that a genius FGC is more recognition, respect and - obviously - brand power than any random game could ever be.
I hope publisheres all around the world will start considering financing these types of projects purely for fame and respect (which strengthens, not erodes the brand). Obviously, you need to be in a good financial shape for that, but if anyone, Marvel can do it.
MK vs Marvel? Hell no lets not forget this shit plus NRS animations and models suck:
![]()
As long as Capcom takes lessons learned from SFV and communicate better and not forced then Marvel 4 will be great.
That depends on if they lift the infamous X-Men/F4 ban anytime soon. But knowing Ike Perlmutter, I wouldn't get your hopes up.
/PJSalt....I just can't see a fighting game being a bigger success than an open world Spider-Man game, or an Iron Man tps, for example. I know the FGC would want a new MvC above all else, but the FGC simply isn't big enough to warrant Marvel's immediate attention. Look at Street Fighter 5. Darling of the FGC, commercial poison. Marvel need to think bigger.
Didn't you hear earlier in the thread, Ike Perlmutter is Nightmare.4 player co-op X-Men game with 20 playable characters, make my dreams come true.
Or how it would most likely look for MvC4.
![]()
So with this I can imagine he's establishing a universe similar to the movies... a sort of Marvel Game Universe (MGU) which is seperate from the movies and only draws inspiration from the comic books.
I can dig it.
I also dig the need for quality experiences... the arkham series is still the best superhero titles ever released. I hope insomniac challenges this with Spiderman.
With all this said... gonna need that Marvel vs. Capcom 4 tho.
They'd be better off just given the moves of the fallen X-Men/F4 characters to other existing Marvel characters (Captain Marvel gets Rogues moves, Black Panther gets Wolverine's moves, Loki gets Doctor Doom's moves, Groot gets Sentinel's moves, Gamora gets X-23's moves, Star-Lord gets Cable's moves, etc.).Lol
They should just make a NEW ORIGINAL CHARACTER called Doctor Dome with his exact moveset.
Unfortunately, Ike Perlmutter is one stubborn motherfucker.Just think of all the cool X-Men games that will never exist. You're never going to get the film rights back Marvel, just accept it and give us what we want.
Which seems very narrow-minded if true. Marvel still owns the X-Men comics and toys. It's crazy that they would sacrifice promoting their own X-Men stuff just to give Fox the middle-finger.
I just can't see a fighting game being a bigger success than an open world Spider-Man game, or an Iron Man tps, for example. I know the FGC would want a new MvC above all else, but the FGC simply isn't big enough to warrant Marvel's immediate attention. Look at Street Fighter 5. Darling of the FGC, commercial poison. Marvel need to think bigger.
Lol
They should just make a NEW ORIGINAL CHARACTER called Doctor Dome with his exact moveset.
If I recall, the Hasbro used their influence on the industry to get past the toy ban. Marvel seems to have a harder grip on the video game ban.There have actually been rumors for a few years about a soft ban on X-Men action figures within the figure collecting community, which have been completely destroyed recently by an upcoming wave of all X characters. The occasional second/third-hand report of comments made by people on the inside made it sound as if there was never a mandate disallowing it from happening, just that it was politically difficult while other options were easy, and people tend to follow the path of least resistance.
It's a totally different industry and all hearsay anyway, but I wouldn't be surprised if something similar was happening with games. We can all observe the lack of X-Men in recent titles, but we can't say for certain what is a mandate from up high versus the resting state that was settled into due to whatever internal forces. The latter certainly can be, and probably will be, changed by a deliberate shift in strategy such as this, and even the former is not immutable.
Doctor Doom hasn't been featured on Ultimate Spider-Man in a long time. In fact, they've phased out all of the X-Men & Fantastic Four characters from the cartoons as of recently.I know people are saying that Marvel wouldn't use X-Men & FF characters in these games, but there's really no reason not to. All of those movie politics should not affect any other medium. Dr. Doom was in the Ultimate Spider-Man animated series not too long ago.
You would have a point if Marvel was only allowing one game to be made, this deal seems like they want to see multiple games over the next few years. SFV was rushed and that's why it didn't do well not because it was a fighting game. Marvel 4 more than likely won't be rushed according to how Marvel is dealing with things this time around. The FGC is growing every year Evo is breaking multiple records in terms of attendance so it isn't like its 5 people in their basements playing these games.