I don't think DS3 problem is MT's and I dont believe that single player games are doomed to loot boxes if SoW is successful so we'll have to agree to disagree.
We can only wait and see, I certainly hope not.
As far as DS3 goes, it's a pretty straight line from MT's to it's failure. EA demanded MT's, so they had to implement a new weapon crafting system to support it. This in turn leads to some crazy OP weapons and universal ammunition. To balance this they sped up the necromorphs, which now swarm the player. It's no longer a horror game and fans of the series hate it.
It had other serious problems, but the MT's fundamentally changed the way the game was played and broke the survival horror progression.
So MT system that has risen worries about being Pay 4 Power system because you literally can get some powerful cards with € is fine because game has content and gets some maps for free in future?
At least that is my understanding of their gambling box, feel free to correct me.
Regardless isn't it little hypocritical to judge one game (SoW) for system a lot like that mentioned above, but give another game pass on it because that system in that case gives few free maps down the line?
I'm not giving it a pass just yet, I said I'm willing to see how it turns out. I don't like MT's in any form but in general a massive online shooter using them instead of a season pass is an easier pill to swallow than a single player game using them to let players skip a grind. My opinion is entirely subject to change though, I haven't played either of the games I am discussing.