Sinh_Magnus
Member
Seems good? I'm still on "wait and see" approach, but I had tons of fun with the first game.
Bleak and bland world is worrying.
The first game's biggest weakness was that exactly.
edit: SPOILER ALERT - the Gamespot video review seems to show the last battle and what comes after the ending...[/QUOTE]
The fuck?!
Thanks for the warning, was just about to watch it!
How to try to put one positive and one negative in a single sentence and ending up with two positives in my book.
I DO want that management part, I DO want to manage my army and I DO want to be the owner of a small army in the middle earth.
Please and thank you.
You get a free physical "Ring of Power" as well, to be sent out at a later date, and some free DLC.I enjoyed the first game so I'm glad to see this one review well.
I was on the fence on picking this up at launch but Best Buy has the $10 preorder bonus on this one so its effectively $38 after GCU, so I think I will pick it up after all.
yup, not even gonna bother with this one.
![]()
The last negative sounds far more impactful than the 3 positives.
How on earth can gamespot justify showing the end mission and ending itself. Personally I dont really care about Tolkien lore, but there are many fans that would be looking forward to the story elements.
I agree that the voice acting is superb. Troy Baker is always good.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eD3h0894QY
Optional but still influenced the game design
Seems like some sites reviewd lower because of the rampant microntransactions. Good on them.
Game itself looks quite good, though my gaming budget for this month is already strained. Maybe in the next months.
In the game's actual final act, you cycle through the four fortresses you explored previously for a total of 20 more defending siege battles. If you haven't upgraded the Orcs you met early in the game--and up until this point, there was no reason to--you have to replace and upgrade your entire retinue of Orcs to match this more powerful invading force. The enemies you face level up with each encounter, so you're also forced into upgrading each castle over and over again, either by building up your current Orc army or finding new fighters and replacing the old. This Sisyphean quest has no corresponding significant characters to keep you company or explain why it's important to tackle the defense missions in the order you do. It's not even clear, exactly, why you want to do them at all.
More than once I felt like giving up on this quest thinking I'd stumbled onto some optional side content that was clearly only made for obsessed completionists. But enduring on, I found that finishing every stage unlocks the final cutscene and credits. It did not feel worth it.
It's an entire section that should have been cut or severely truncated, and playing through the repetitious levels felt like padding meant only to make the game last longer. But although the game's final act is the most egregious, there are several other systems that Shadow of War fails to justify.
Seems like some sites reviewd lower because of the rampant microntransactions. Good on them.
Bleak and bland world is worrying.
The first game's biggest weakness was that exactly.
edit: SPOILER ALERT - the Gamespot video review seems to show the last battle and what comes after the ending...
This sounds bad...
Wow cant belive they are giving those good scores considering how its all build around loot boxes and microtransactions
I remember ACGs review, I believe, said you could just spam that flip jump parry or whatever through the whole game making it comically easy... hope thats been addressed
That's a baseless assumption that no one here has any proof of.Optional but still influenced the game design
And yet the Gamespot review says it has varied exciting new locations.Bland locations again? I don't understand how that happens in a Lord of the Rings game twice.
Yes...fuck all those people calling out bullshit micro transaction practices.
When do reviewers start to dock points for heinous anti-consumer practices?
Or is it because they're under payroll that they don't have the guts.
It's because they played the game and didn't see any reason to score it lowerWhen do reviewers start to dock points for heinous anti-consumer practices?
Or is it because they're under payroll that they don't have the guts.
That's a baseless assumption that no one here has any proof of.
I'm actually glad they showed it. Knowing that in order to get the true ending, you have to serious grind 20 battles puts me off the game completely. I didn't see anything amazing about it either. Story didn't even seem worth it, TBH.
Yeah. It was the final nail in the coffin for me. This is far more worrying than any loot box concerns.
That tends to be the reality of loot boxes.Actually, many of the reviews seem to suggest the opposite of what he is claiming in that the loot boxes feel tacked on after the fact.
This sounds bad...
Good scores but sadly this game is ruined for me by its shitty loot boxes and other microtransactions.
Still no buy from me.
Yeah I remember a video making the rounds of some guy killing endless waves of orcs without even looking at the screen. He was just pressing the same button over and over.
How and why?
There is absolutely no reason to buy these loot boxes with actual money when, investing time in this game, gives you enough ingame currency to purchase these.
The sudden hate is amazing.
I knew this game screamed grind with the way it pushed fortresses on the first announcement >_<
Sounds as bad as Arkham Knight's ending
I am curious why so many in here have selected this particular game as the hill they want to die on as it pertains to micro-transactions and loot boxes, especially considering how prevalent these forms of monetization have become.
Loot boxes are a hot button issue right now. It is also that time of year when AAA games are in full bloom.
I am curious why so many in here have selected this particular game as the hill they want to die on as it pertains to micro-transactions and loot boxes, especially considering how prevalent these forms of monetization have become.
They seem to be a hot topic for this game in particular with people slandering it as the pinnacle of anti-consumerism while turning a blind eye to the many other companies and developers doing similar things.