YianGaruga
Banned
This photo still pisses me off. The quality on display here is so far from what we have seen from the final product it's unreal. It's like the next level of bullshot.
It's called "concept art"
This photo still pisses me off. The quality on display here is so far from what we have seen from the final product it's unreal. It's like the next level of bullshot.
Shocker.
This game never had any chance coming out in February. It's doubtful it'll ever come out.
That's why he clarified that it's something beyond a normal bullshot, "the next level"It's called "concept art"
This photo still pisses me off. The quality on display here is so far from what we have seen from the final product it's unreal. It's like the next level of bullshot.
Incoming a bunch of apologists blaming your naivety for thinking that's how it was going to look or some shit. When in reality the 2.5d garbage was hidden in an FAQ.What happened?
![]()
Inafune-kun, denwa.
It's called "concept art"
[...]
All in all, my actual point in this thread is just that a few delays that don't even add up to a whole year yet do not warrant the kind of TRAIN-WRECK! SCAM! JOKE OF THE CENTURY! reactions that some people have shown in this thread. Is it annoying that people aren't getting a game they might still be anticipating? I'm sure it is. Still doesn't make those kinds of overreactions any less silly. True train-wrecks are projects like Soul Saga and Project Phoenix that have almost nothing to show after years of development (or "development"), at least MN9 seems like they do actually have a fairly polished version of the whole game in their hands already that, apart from disappointing some people with how it looks visually, is pretty close to the pitch that they gave and they are just struggling with the online portion at this late stage of development. That's not a train-wreck. Perhaps somewhat mishandled from a PR point of view, but all in all this still seems like it's actually a reality and not just some distant dream that might come to fruition if all stars align correctly 10 years from now.
That's why he clarified that it's something beyond a normal bullshot, "the next level"
Why must you bring back those nightmares...?Mighty Endless 9
Inafune-kun, denwa.
Of course it is! There was no reason to think the finalBut it's just concept art, the final game was never going to look like that. That's not a bullshot or along that vein because they were never saying the game was going to look like that.
Not that I'm saying it wasn't a bit scummy for them to make that the first thing you see on the kickstarter page, but it's not even close to an apt comparison.
Man they should of just released the game without the mp mode (then mp mode later)...
But it's just concept art, the final game was never going to look like that. That's not a bullshot or along that vein because they were never saying the game was going to look like that exactly.
But it's just concept art, the final game was never going to look like that. That's not a bullshot or along that vein because they were never saying the game was going to look like that exactly.
Not that I'm saying it wasn't a bit scummy for them to make that the first thing you see on the kickstarter page, but it's not even close to an apt comparison.
Then you should probably look at it from a different angle. Like how one is developed with your money, and how one isn't.
I'm obviously not commentating on the development itself, but rather, the higher standards because of the type of funding.
Of course it is! There was no reason to think the final
game wouldn't look anything like that. You might as well call the original trailer for Watch Dogs or Colonial Marines "concept art". They go out of their way to make it look like a screenshot, there's a HUD.
On par with this
![]()
But it's just concept art, the final game was never going to look like that. That's not a bullshot or along that vein because they were never saying the game was going to look like that exactly.
Not that I'm saying it wasn't a bit scummy for them to make that the first thing you see on the kickstarter page, but it's not even close to an apt comparison.
What happened?
![]()
On par with this
![]()
I think the same can be said of the developers of Mighty No. 9 lolyou don't seem to understand what concept art is
But even all the other pictures on the KS page use the same artstyle, so of course people believe they are aiming for that:
It's called "concept art"
Of course it is! There was no reason to think the final
game wouldn't look anything like that. You might as well call the original trailer for Watch Dogs or Colonial Marines "concept art". They go out of their way to make it look like a screenshot, there's a HUD.
But it speaks to a style they never had the slightest intention of following through on. They haven't even got a cel shader for beck & enemies
So you're arguing that developers should be more constrained by scheduling demands when crowdfunding a game than they should be when negotiating with a publisher?
There is at least a proportion of people who kickstart products on the notion that they want to reduce the influence of a publisher in the end product. It would strike me as hypocritical for such people to then turn around and demand a release earlier than the developer is satisfied with.
A pledge to Kickstarter, for me, is a pledge of trust in the developer to produce a product. This might fail. I accept that; the whole notion of risk means I must be willing to consider the possibility.
That was the first (and only image IIRC) that they used on the KS page, so of course people think that thats the style they were aiming for.
I guess this is why indie games don't launch on all platforms at once. This is coming to PC (Windows, Mac, Linux), PS4, PS3, Xbox One, Xbox 360, Wii U, PS Vita and Nintendo 3DS. Simultaneously.
That's 10 platforms! And they're working on net code for each one! It sounds like a total nightmare
That would be a career suicide decision.LOL
I'm totally expecting cancellation news at some point
That's a ridiculous undertaking for even a large accomplished studio. This was them biting off more than they can chew trying to get as much $ as possible and not thinking this through rationally.
Judging it from the pc demo, I gotta say it's pretty awful. The graphics are below average, the art style is beyond ugly, gameplay is dull, and despite them claiming the game it's almost complete, the cutscenes looked unfinished.Is this game good btw. ? I am sure you backers played some demos?
"Due to the inability to finalize some of the extensive network features..."LOL
I'm totally expecting cancellation news at some point
Correct. Even Activision don't release on 10 platforms at once with things like Call of Duty, outsourcing them to external teams.
Obviously this isn't an option for a smaller company...but it seems they thought fuck it, we will try it anyway
Yet here we are end of January just before the revised release, and they are delaying the game again, because they still can't fix this fucking bug in multiplayer, a feature that most people don't even care about.The game is pretty much done. We were doing bug fixes and we found some bugs in the network system that will affect the multiplayer. It's not like a 'showstopper' bug, but it'll make players really frustrated. We don't want that to be the experience for our players, so that's why we decided to delay and polish the game a little bit more.