• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Serial: Season 01 Discussion - This American Life meets True Detective

Status
Not open for further replies.

BearPawB

Banned
I can't get over him not calling her once he learned she was missing. Even though he called her like 3 times the night before.

That is just bizzare.
 

RedShift

Member
Wait so, about that Neisha call: She remembers Adnan calling her and putting Jay on the phone, but the prosecutor stopped her from revealing that they were at the porn store Jay worked at, meaning the call didn't happen until weeks after the murder (this is some Edgeworth level BS btw).

So after this guy made him help bury a body Jay is still inviting Adnan over to his work place and chilling with him. You'd think he'd want to spend as little time around him as possible.

And another thing, why did Adnan put Jay on the phone anyway? Maybe I'm just out of touch but why would someone put their friend (sorry, I mean "casual acquaintance") on the phone with some girl they're seeing casually? That seems off to me.

I still have no idea what's going on but I'm starting to lean to Adnan and Jay doing it together for some reason.
 

Peru

Member
I guess this is what I'm wrestling with. It's not that the show is bad or interesting--obviously I'm still listening to it. It's that it's aimless. It opens so many worthwhile questions: Did he do it? Why does she care? Why does she think this case of all cases is worth reporting on? Regardless his guilt, what's twenty years in prison do to a kid who goes in from high school? How reliable is witness testimony, what can cloud of perceptions? Is our criminal justice system fair?

She's opened all these threads but her methods aren't really driving any of them toward answered in an intentional way. She's framing the thing around "did he do it?" but the methods she employs to investigate that question are naive and bound to fail to come to anything conclusive.

I think it's odd that you're asking for a Dickensian narrative here - to me what makes it interesting is that it isn't. What makes it interesting is that it's just another mundane case, but one we go deep into -- because. Because a regular old murder with someone in jail who might have done it and people connected to him or her or it who don't understand who or why or when tells us a lot about murder cases in general, about murder suspects and about police work and things we don't know for sure. It's interesting in and of itself and would not be half as interesting, in this case, as a piece of reporting, if it was pitched on a higher concept level. Perhaps it's not as interesting if your knowledge of 'everyday' murder cases is already intimate. For most people it's not, because a piece of journalism like this is rare and presentation of "mundane" real life crime minutia rarely this gripping. So it tells a lot of people valuable stories they haven't heard before.
 

Brakke

Banned
I think it's odd that you're asking for a Dickensian narrative here - to me what makes it interesting is that it isn't. What makes it interesting is that it's just another mundane case, but one we go deep into -- because. Because a regular old murder with someone in jail who might have done it and people connected to him or her or it who don't understand who or why or when tells us a lot about murder cases in general, about murder suspects and about police work and things we don't know for sure. It's interesting in and of itself and would not be half as interesting, in this case, as a piece of reporting, if it was pitched on a higher concept level. Perhaps it's not as interesting if your knowledge of 'everyday' murder cases is already intimate. For most people it's not, because a piece of journalism like this is rare and presentation of "mundane" real life crime minutia rarely this gripping. So it tells a lot of people valuable stories they haven't heard before.

I'm not looking for a Dickensian narrative so much as I'm looking for an angle, any angle. What she's made is totally toothless. It just seems like she's missing a lot of opportunities to contextualize any of the mundane things that happen. It doesn't even need a single thesis statement so much as it needs to actually address the questions it raises. How many segments have ended with "hmm I don't know what to make of that"? If this line of inquiry told you nothing, why are you sharing it with us?

I dunno. Capote hit the scene more than fifty years old, right? There's no way you make a true crime story and don't get compared to that, and Serial just totally deflates in the face of In Cold Blood.
 

effzee

Member
I want to be on Adnan's side. My wife's family lives in the discussed area. My wife's cousins knew adnan's family growing up. Have been over. Feel horrible for what his family has gone through and lives through still. His mother and father especially. I feel life through my in laws I know them. Very typical Pakistani family.

I'm hooked. I want to believe him.

But two questions nag me which go against Adnan:

1. We learn him and Hae are still in touch and friendly. She calls him when she has an accident. He and his friends also insist he was a playa, party animal, who had 2-3 girls he was talking too or seeing at once. So if he isn't depressed and furious with her, why would he not once page her or call her after its confirmed she is missing?

Her friends all call and try. Adnan says be was in constant touch with the friends an getting information first hand. But not one call?

I get not calling when the cops called cause he might be thinking she is just out with her boyfriend and will be in trouble with her parents. But he called her 3 times the night before and never again. Doesn't add up.

2. The Nisha call. If he is at school at track practice, who calls Nisha? Jay? Why would he? Wouldn't she remember speaking only to Jay?

One thing that does go in his favor in my mind is I just don't imagine him and Jay (if they were in this together) killing her in broad day light and then instead of being in a rush to bury her, drive around town randomly hitting up friends houses and smoking pot. Wouldn't anyone try to hide or get rid of the evidence ?

They so casually spend the evening taking huge risks at every turn, especially Adnan since it was Ramadan.

And how do we know she was killed that day at all? Is the coroner's report or autopsy revealing anything that says she was killed that day that tike for sure? Is that all on what Jay says?

Personally right now I do think Adnan was involved somehow but it might be drug related (the 3rd party) and he is far more afraid of retaliation (to his fam?). You'd think he would be screaming and crying with his own theories and proofs


All he does is poke holes. Almost like he wants to be freed but only if he gets off on incompetent police work and prosecution.
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
Personally right now I do think Adnan was involved somehow but it might be drug related (the 3rd party) and he is far more afraid of retaliation (to his fam?). You'd think he would be screaming and crying with his own theories and proofs

Eh... even innocent people lose hope after spending years and years in prison. That fight is exhausting and draining. I don't think it's at all unrealistic for an innocent person to simply be over it after a certain point. Passionately fighting the system and gaining no traction for years would be spiritually crushing. I don't find his somewhat indifference to be a red flag in an of itself.
 

Cromat

Member
Love this show, thanks for posting about it.

As for the case, I think Adnan did it but that Jay is more involved than he let on.
The main reason is that who else could it have been? Adnan is the only person with a sort-of motive and it's unclear why Jay would make something like this up when it can very seriously affect him.

Also, as mentioned above the fact that he didn't call her after she was reported missing is very very weird.
 
intense episode. lots of new info, listening to adnan squirm when presented with a bunch of difficult evidence was uncomfortable, then the long statement of his feelings was fascinating. need to re-listen.

my running theory is basically that jay and adnan did it together, to a degree that you can only speculate and idk how much more this podcast can uncover. adnan knows that the state's case is wrong, and frustrated that it makes him out to be more callous and cold and is just incorrect, but can't throw jay in for it as the only way he knows totally that jay's clearly lying is because he did it with him. jay's testimony is all over the shop as he and jenn have edited it to reduce his involvement and lucked out with the police departments desire to get a conviction for adnan.

the thing is that doesn't really gell is that he could correct the record without protesting his innocence. but maybe, he is a smart guy, protesting his innocence is the only way to get the coverage that means his involvement can be reduced in public. or that it would just kill his family to admit guilt. or just that you need some hope on life sentence of escaping on a mis-trial because of jay's evidence and the sketchy 22 minute window presented to get through the day. or maybe he actually is innocent.

Wait so, about that Neisha call: She remembers Adnan calling her and putting Jay on the phone, but the prosecutor stopped her from revealing that they were at the porn store Jay worked at, meaning the call didn't happen until weeks after the murder (this is some Edgeworth level BS btw).

So after this guy made him help bury a body Jay is still inviting Adnan over to his work place and chilling with him. You'd think he'd want to spend as little time around him as possible.

And another thing, why did Adnan put Jay on the phone anyway? Maybe I'm just out of touch but why would someone put their friend (sorry, I mean "casual acquaintance") on the phone with some girl they're seeing casually? That seems off to me.

I still have no idea what's going on but I'm starting to lean to Adnan and Jay doing it together for some reason.
Wooooorrrd
 

RPS37

Member
Yay so I'm all caught up now! What's going on in here? Can't believe people thought this was fiction.
 
In a stunning twist, I have been following the show from the very beginning but have just caught up to this thread.

I have nothing new to say that hasn't been said I was this thread, but I just went to the official Serial website and found out that Sarah Koenig has a striking resemblance to my sister.

#Jaydidit
 

GRW810

Member
Finished episode five on the way to work this morning, going to listen to episode six on the way home.

So far I think Adnan is guilty. The case is mired in confusion and contradiction and it's certainly not clear cut, but I can't see a way in which anyone but Adnan did it. He's very convincing to listen to but I haven't heard a single thing to even slightly prove his innocence, while there's a bunch of things, admittedly weak, circumstantial or slightly off, that suggest he did it. Ok, there's the girl at the library, but she seems to be the only person in the world who remembers this encounter. Not even Adnan does, which is very strange.

One thing that stands out to me is how much information and evidence was overlooked or misinterpreted. Whichever way it would have leant in the case there seems to be so much that wasn't fully explored. Why didn't detectives investigate the route from episode five? The Best Buy phone. If Jay's evidence was the prosecution's key to the case, why did the jury believe a pot-smoking guy who changed his story half a dozen times? Surely that discredits him completely, even if the truth seeps out occasionally.
 

Malyse

Member
Finished episode five on the way to work this morning, going to listen to episode six on the way home.

So far I think Adnan is guilty. The case is mired in confusion and contradiction and it's certainly not clear cut, but I can't see a way in which anyone but Adnan did it. He's very convincing to listen to but I haven't heard a single thing to even slightly prove his innocence, while there's a bunch of things, admittedly weak, circumstantial or slightly off, that suggest he did it. Ok, there's the girl at the library, but she seems to be the only person in the world who remembers this encounter. Not even Adnan does, which is very strange.

One thing that stands out to me is how much information and evidence was overlooked or misinterpreted. Whichever way it would have leant in the case there seems to be so much that wasn't fully explored. Why didn't detectives investigate the route from episode five? The Best Buy phone. If Jay's evidence was the prosecution's key to the case, why did the jury believe a pot-smoking guy who changed his story half a dozen times? Surely that discredits him completely, even if the truth seeps out occasionally.

Once police have a suspect they think is guilty, they stop investigating the case and looking for new leads. Literally happens all the time.
 

Amir0x

Banned
Jesus I am gripped. mid-Episode 5 and I'm all on the edge of my seat. But given the details Jay knew, seems everything is pretty much on why and how he knew it. I think Jay had to be involved in the murder itself.
 

GRW810

Member
Completely caught up now, having finished episode six. Adnan looks more guilty than ever. I just can't see a way in which he isn't guilty. Proof he did it is thin on the ground, but proof otherwise is non-existent.
 

Malyse

Member
Completely caught up now, having finished episode six. Adnan looks more guilty than ever. I just can't see a way in which he isn't guilty. Proof he did it is thin on the ground, but proof otherwise is non-existent.
Again, we need to hear episode seven. Six was sort of intended to make you against Adnan.
 

AcridMeat

Banned
I can't get over him not calling her once he learned she was missing. Even though he called her like 3 times the night before.

That is just bizzare.
Yeah that's stuck in my mind as well. Especially when she questioned him about it and he says he kept in contact with close friends, kind of avoiding answering the question it sounded really bad for his case to me.
Wait so, about that Neisha call: She remembers Adnan calling her and putting Jay on the phone, but the prosecutor stopped her from revealing that they were at the porn store Jay worked at, meaning the call didn't happen until weeks after the murder (this is some Edgeworth level BS btw).

So after this guy made him help bury a body Jay is still inviting Adnan over to his work place and chilling with him. You'd think he'd want to spend as little time around him as possible.

And another thing, why did Adnan put Jay on the phone anyway? Maybe I'm just out of touch but why would someone put their friend (sorry, I mean "casual acquaintance") on the phone with some girl they're seeing casually? That seems off to me.

I still have no idea what's going on but I'm starting to lean to Adnan and Jay doing it together for some reason.
Jay is one of the sketchiest dudes I've ever heard of. He has to have taken part in it in some way, it's ridiculous. I want her to speak with Jay directly.
I want to be on Adnan's side. My wife's family lives in the discussed area. My wife's cousins knew adnan's family growing up. Have been over. Feel horrible for what his family has gone through and lives through still. His mother and father especially. I feel life through my in laws I know them. Very typical Pakistani family.

I'm hooked. I want to believe him.

But two questions nag me which go against Adnan:

1. We learn him and Hae are still in touch and friendly. She calls him when she has an accident. He and his friends also insist he was a playa, party animal, who had 2-3 girls he was talking too or seeing at once. So if he isn't depressed and furious with her, why would he not once page her or call her after its confirmed she is missing?

Her friends all call and try. Adnan says be was in constant touch with the friends an getting information first hand. But not one call?

I get not calling when the cops called cause he might be thinking she is just out with her boyfriend and will be in trouble with her parents. But he called her 3 times the night before and never again. Doesn't add up.

2. The Nisha call. If he is at school at track practice, who calls Nisha? Jay? Why would he? Wouldn't she remember speaking only to Jay?

One thing that does go in his favor in my mind is I just don't imagine him and Jay (if they were in this together) killing her in broad day light and then instead of being in a rush to bury her, drive around town randomly hitting up friends houses and smoking pot. Wouldn't anyone try to hide or get rid of the evidence ?

They so casually spend the evening taking huge risks at every turn, especially Adnan since it was Ramadan.

And how do we know she was killed that day at all? Is the coroner's report or autopsy revealing anything that says she was killed that day that tike for sure? Is that all on what Jay says?

Personally right now I do think Adnan was involved somehow but it might be drug related (the 3rd party) and he is far more afraid of retaliation (to his fam?). You'd think he would be screaming and crying with his own theories and proofs


All he does is poke holes. Almost like he wants to be freed but only if he gets off on incompetent police work and prosecution.
I really hope we get an episode that goes more in depth on this as well. All I remember is her saying that the report stated it had to happen within that amount of time, but with how mishandled so much of the evidence has been I want that to be investigated.

Also just in general, if the guy is innocent, had no part in it, I just don't understand how he's so calm and collected talking about everything with her. This is just my own feeling so it's not backed by anything, but if I knew I was innocent and had no part in something as awful as murdering an ex girlfriend, I'd be pleading like crazy because getting a life sentence as an innocent man is my biggest fear in the world. Always struck me as odd.
edit: I understand he's been in jail for a long time now, so that feeling of giving up may have already come in, but with this new opportunity with so many new ears to the case, I dunno.

Glad I found this thread, this podcast is really incredible.
 
I think the thing that gets me the most is that Adnan said Jay and him weren't really friends. So why would he call Jay to partake in what he said?

That's the most damning thing about Adnan's story in this whole thing. Everything else is super open to interpretation, Jay could have easily internally felt threatened by Adnan enough to keep quiet, etc, etc. I bought Jay's reasoning throughout his testimony episode, for example.

The real nail in the coffin for me is Adnan having little recollection of being Jay's close friend but there being incontrovertible evidence of Jay having Adnan's phone and them using it together at the same time period at the time of the murder (calling Adnan's hookup, IIRC.)

Those two things just don't square. I felt especially in the Jay Testimony episode, every time Sarah tried to paint Jay's version as inscrutable, there was nothing he said I didn't believe could be possible in his own perception.

Still have to listen to this week's episode. Needless to say, I am totally loving this podcast.
 

Brakke

Banned
Once police have a suspect they think is guilty, they stop investigating the case and looking for new leads. Literally happens all the time.

DAs don't press charges they don't think they can make stick. DAs "literally all the time" force police to keep investigations open or else drop charges. Let's be precise about it. Police thought the case against Adnan was strong, DA thought it was strong, judge thought it was strong, and ultimately a jury thought it was strong.

There's a lot of layers between lazy/incompetent detectives and a criminal conviction. Since exactly zero of Sarah's lines of inquiry have turned up anything particularly valuable (except a possible misrepresentation at trial of one call), the claim that the police investigation was insufficiently thorough is very weak.
 

DoubleD

Member
Finished episodes 1-6 yesterday. Wow. I love how this podcast is produced.
First I want to thank the OP for recommending it in the recommendation thread and linking this one.
One thing that bothers me is how seemingly calm both guys are after allegedly burying a girl they both knew and that one had an intimate relationship with. The report from Kathy about Adnan and Jay's behavior at her apartment is disturbing and abnormal for two young men who just participated in such a horrible act. To me it doesn't sit right. The only one that shows any suspicious behavior is Adnan during that phone call he received and him running out of the apartment. Jay seemed mellow yellow. All smoking out and hanging. I would think that "normal" young men would show some sort of nervousness or something. Their behavior is almost disconnected like that of a psychopath. Go on with usual life after burying a body.
After episode six I am still not sure about Adnan. Jay is definitely suspicious and I believe he had more involvement than what he told the police and testified in court.
Looking forward to episode 7.
 
Anyone listen to episode 7 yet? Not much in terms of new evidence, but SK has an entire superteam of people investigating with her now. This is pretty exciting.
 

Zeeman

Member
Anyone listen to episode 7 yet? Not much in terms of new evidence, but SK has an entire superteam of people investigating with her now. This is pretty exciting.
I appreciated that all the students were saying that there was way too little evidence to convict. The most exciting part of the episode was the teaser for the next one though.
 

Amir0x

Banned
The deal with Jay is going to be a pivotal episode. There is so much shady shit with Jay it's unbelievable.

To me, Jay was definitely directly involved in the killing itself. And if he was, I think that likely means Adnan was as well... but the evidence is not yet enough to convict.
 

tokkun

Member
I'm not wild about them bringing in this team of investigators. The series was already lacking a narrative voice from the prosecution side. Now, in addition to Adnan himself and Sarah struggling to remain neutral, there is a whole team of people operating from the assumption that he is innocent and trying to prove it.
 
The deal with Jay is going to be a pivotal episode. There is so much shady shit with Jay it's unbelievable.

To me, Jay was definitely directly involved in the killing itself. And if he was, I think that likely means Adnan was as well... but the evidence is not yet enough to convict.

Seriously. I think this episode will likely define the rest of the series. Without more to go on I feel like there is not much they can do in the way of describing just how odd the whole case is. Sooner or later there has to be something for SK to go on herself.

I'm not wild about them bringing in this team of investigators. The series was already lacking a narrative voice from the prosecution side. Now, in addition to Adnan himself and Sarah struggling to remain neutral, there is a whole team of people operating from the assumption that he is innocent and trying to prove it.

I'm not sure what you mean? It seemed like SK made it pretty obvious that this team will be it's own seperate thing and will have nothing to do with her beyond this point. I took this episode as an answer to all the Lawyer types saying "There just isn't enough evidence" this whole time. Now SK will go back to doing her own thing while that team does their own.
 

Emerson

May contain jokes =>
I'm not wild about them bringing in this team of investigators. The series was already lacking a narrative voice from the prosecution side. Now, in addition to Adnan himself and Sarah struggling to remain neutral, there is a whole team of people operating from the assumption that he is innocent and trying to prove it.

What are you even talking about? Why should they operate from any other assumption? Innocent until proven guilty is supposed to be the default.
 

jond76

Banned
Too many strange things. The whole never trying to call after she went missing is a giant red flag for me. It tells me that he knew she was gone.

I wonder if she can track Jay down...
 

daveo42

Banned
I feel like I'm going to have blue balls for the next week over the end of episode 7 and what we will get in episode 8. I really want to hear Jay's story and how that all plays into this murder.

I'm not wild about them bringing in this team of investigators. The series was already lacking a narrative voice from the prosecution side. Now, in addition to Adnan himself and Sarah struggling to remain neutral, there is a whole team of people operating from the assumption that he is innocent and trying to prove it.

Having an actual team of legal investigators review the case front to back was probably a good idea, as was keeping her own investigation separate from theirs. Plus, there is a ton of stuff SK missed along the way with her own investigation because while she is skeptical, she also glossed over a lot of details related to the case because she thought the detectives and investigators at the time exhausted most every avenue. We found out this episode they dropped the ball way too often and that happens far more than we'd like to think.

I think we won't be hearing from that team of investigators at any point until the final episode where things wrap up.
 

tokkun

Member
What are you even talking about? Why should they operate from any other assumption?

I am talking about the narrative that is presented on the podcast.

We already have Adnan saying "I am innocent."
We have Sarah who is trying to stay neutral, but who wants to think Adnan is innocent because he is a nice guy.

The narrative from the prosecution has been missing in this series. We don't have interviews with Jay. We don't have interviews with the investigators. We don't have interviews with the prosecution's lawyers.

Now we are going to have another group with a goal of proving Adnan is innocent. I am concerned that this will impact the narrative balance of the show to its detriment.

Innocent until proven guilty is supposed to be the default.

That is the standard for a legal trial of someone who has not been found guilty.

This is not a trial. There already was a trial, and Adnan was found guilty. "Innocent until proven guilty" is no longer relevant. Moreover, if this were a trial, we would have a voice from both the prosecution and the defense.
 

Amir0x

Banned
My least favorite part of this episode was when the ending theme music started.

I am seriously so depressed because there is basically nothing else I can turn to that's even remotely like this at this extensive depth. I just have to wait for next week lol
 

Emerson

May contain jokes =>
I am talking about the narrative that is presented on the podcast.

We already have Adnan saying "I am innocent."
We have Sarah who is trying to stay neutral, but who wants to think Adnan is innocent because he is a nice guy.

The narrative from the prosecution has been missing in this series. We don't have interviews with Jay. We don't have interviews with the investigators. We don't have interviews with the prosecution's lawyers.

Now we are going to have another group with a goal of proving Adnan is innocent. I am concerned that this will impact the narrative balance of the show to its detriment.

That is the standard for a legal trial of someone who has not been found guilty.

This is not a trial. There already was a trial, and Adnan was found guilty. "Innocent until proven guilty" is no longer relevant. Moreover, if this were a trial, we would have a voice from both the prosecution and the defense.

The fact that he was already convicted and has spent years in prison where every interview is conducted isn't enough of a counter balance? And they just did an episode whose stated mission at the top was to "lay out the entire case against Adnan."

I'm not sure what you want from them. Why would Jay or members of the prosecution grant an interview? They have absolutely no incentive to do that. She already said that she tried to interview the detectives and both were uninterested.
 
I'm so glad forensics was finally brought up. The lack of details about the crime scene findings has driven me crazy. Hopefully the team finds something. Anything.
 

NimbusD

Member
Finished episode five on the way to work this morning, going to listen to episode six on the way home.

So far I think Adnan is guilty. The case is mired in confusion and contradiction and it's certainly not clear cut, but I can't see a way in which anyone but Adnan did it. He's very convincing to listen to but I haven't heard a single thing to even slightly prove his innocence, while there's a bunch of things, admittedly weak, circumstantial or slightly off, that suggest he did it. Ok, there's the girl at the library, but she seems to be the only person in the world who remembers this encounter. Not even Adnan does, which is very strange.

One thing that stands out to me is how much information and evidence was overlooked or misinterpreted. Whichever way it would have leant in the case there seems to be so much that wasn't fully explored. Why didn't detectives investigate the route from episode five? The Best Buy phone. If Jay's evidence was the prosecution's key to the case, why did the jury believe a pot-smoking guy who changed his story half a dozen times? Surely that discredits him completely, even if the truth seeps out occasionally.

But that's just the thing. In a trial he should be presumed innocent. If you do that, as you're supposed to, and then look at what we know of the state's case, they don't have enough to PROVE that he did it. At least they didn't pursue enough avenues to prove without a doubt that he did it. Of course they built up a convincing case against him, that's their job, Adnan's side's job isn't to prove he's innocent, but that the case against him isn't correct, and in a lot of places, it isn't (so it seems).

I just caught up too so I don't know what's been discussed and what hasn't.
 

tokkun

Member
The fact that he was already convicted and has spent years in prison where every interview is conducted isn't enough of a counter balance? And they just did an episode whose stated mission at the top was to "lay out the entire case against Adnan."

I'm not sure what you want from them. Why would Jay or members of the prosecution grant an interview? They have absolutely no incentive to do that. She already said that she tried to interview the detectives and both were uninterested.

I understand that. I am just saying that as a listener, I personally think the show will be less interesting the more one-sided it gets because diminishes my trust that the facts I am being presented are balanced. YMMV.
 

Brakke

Banned
"That's a scanner scanning its little scanner heart out."

Hehe lovely.

Too many strange things. The whole never trying to call after she went missing is a giant red flag for me. It tells me that he knew she was gone.

I wonder if she can track Jay down...

Well, he did know she was gone. Everyone knew she was gone. This isn't evidence.
 

jond76

Banned
"That's a scanner scanning its little scanner heart out."

Hehe lovely.



Well, he did know she was gone. Everyone knew she was gone. This isn't evidence.

What I meant was while all her friends were trying to contact her, he was not. Seems weird. I'd try to contact a friend of they were reported missing. Yet he did not, making it look like he knew she was already dead.
 

KHarvey16

Member
The not trying to contact her thing doesn't really sway me. At first it seems like everyone just assumed she went somewhere of her own free will - maybe just took off for a bit. Once it became more it sounded like Adnan said he was with those friends when they were trying to contact her and was in direct contact all the time with the family and other friends. I dunno, I can imagine being with a group and one tries to call and it sort of satisfies that desire to try yourself.

It isn't something that causes me to go either way since I can easily see it both ways. I can see why he wouldn't, and I can see why he would. I can also see how a smart guy like him might call incessantly if he were trying to fool people about his innocence from the beginning.
 

Malyse

Member
OP updated.

After episode seven, how are you leaning on Adnan's guilt?

This podcast is literally a stop everything else and listen.
 

Bacon

Member
OP updated.

After episode seven, how are you leaning on Adnan's guilt?

This podcast is literally a stop everything else and listen.

I thought they lawyer's insights were interesting. Particularly her saying that her innocent clients typically don't have the answers that she is looking for. I still think Adnan didn't do it.
 
I thought Deidre was largely full of shit. Her opinions on determining who tells the truth vs who doesn't, the number of charming sociopaths in the wild, and other aspects of the case held no weight with me. I'm only interested in her team's investigation of the forensic evidence: does it still exist? Can it be analyzed further? Might we find DNA linking the crime to a known criminal, Jay, or Adnan?

Sarah nervously asking Deirdre questions followed by Deidre manically answering using wild speculations (she wasn't completely familiar with the case at this point) were a waste of about 15 minutes.
 

KHarvey16

Member
I thought Deidre was largely full of shit. Her opinions on determining who tells the truth vs who doesn't, the number of charming sociopaths in the wild, and other aspects of the case held no weight with me. I'm only interested in her team's investigation of the forensic evidence: does it still exist? Can it be analyzed further? Might we find DNA linking the crime to a known criminal, Jay, or Adnan?

Sarah nervously asking Deirdre questions followed by Deidre manically answering using wild speculations (she wasn't completely familiar with the case at this point) were a waste of about 15 minutes.

I thought her experience and insight helped put into context some of what we're hearing.
 

daveo42

Banned
I thought Deidre was largely full of shit. Her opinions on determining who tells the truth vs who doesn't, the number of charming sociopaths in the wild, and other aspects of the case held no weight with me. I'm only interested in her team's investigation of the forensic evidence: does it still exist? Can it be analyzed further? Might we find DNA linking the crime to a known criminal, Jay, or Adnan?

Sarah nervously asking Deirdre questions followed by Deidre manically answering using wild speculations (she wasn't completely familiar with the case at this point) were a waste of about 15 minutes.

I tend to believe her word and the words of some of her students since:

1. She's been doing this sort of work for decades
2. She teaches law and
3. Her students are studying law

The things Sarah missed or downplayed in previous episodes are highlighted here because she isn't familiar with the nitty gritty bits of doing investigative work for an actual law case and what threads should be followed or not. She's a great investigative journalist, but she's not a lawyer.
 
I tend to believe her word and the words of some of her students since:

1. She's been doing this sort of work for decades
2. She teaches law and
3. Her students are studying law

The things Sarah missed or downplayed in previous episodes are highlighted here because she isn't familiar with the nitty gritty bits of doing investigative work for an actual law case and what threads should be followed or not. She's a great investigative journalist, but she's not a lawyer.
Which things?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom