Also, I made this thread to keep us from getting too far off track.
http://m.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=922954
http://m.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=922954
http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat...e_against_adnan_syed_dissected_did_adnan.html
Slate's spoiler special for episode six is up. Also, I just found out that Rabia has a spoiler free blog that she's been writing.
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/splitt...er-lies-the-anatomy-of-a-wrongful-conviction/
I'm going to add both of these to the OP.
I guess this is what I'm wrestling with. It's not that the show is bad or interesting--obviously I'm still listening to it. It's that it's aimless. It opens so many worthwhile questions: Did he do it? Why does she care? Why does she think this case of all cases is worth reporting on? Regardless his guilt, what's twenty years in prison do to a kid who goes in from high school? How reliable is witness testimony, what can cloud of perceptions? Is our criminal justice system fair?
She's opened all these threads but her methods aren't really driving any of them toward answered in an intentional way. She's framing the thing around "did he do it?" but the methods she employs to investigate that question are naive and bound to fail to come to anything conclusive.
I think it's odd that you're asking for a Dickensian narrative here - to me what makes it interesting is that it isn't. What makes it interesting is that it's just another mundane case, but one we go deep into -- because. Because a regular old murder with someone in jail who might have done it and people connected to him or her or it who don't understand who or why or when tells us a lot about murder cases in general, about murder suspects and about police work and things we don't know for sure. It's interesting in and of itself and would not be half as interesting, in this case, as a piece of reporting, if it was pitched on a higher concept level. Perhaps it's not as interesting if your knowledge of 'everyday' murder cases is already intimate. For most people it's not, because a piece of journalism like this is rare and presentation of "mundane" real life crime minutia rarely this gripping. So it tells a lot of people valuable stories they haven't heard before.
Personally right now I do think Adnan was involved somehow but it might be drug related (the 3rd party) and he is far more afraid of retaliation (to his fam?). You'd think he would be screaming and crying with his own theories and proofs
intense episode. lots of new info, listening to adnan squirm when presented with a bunch of difficult evidence was uncomfortable, then the long statement of his feelings was fascinating. need to re-listen.
my running theory is basically that jay and adnan did it together, to a degree that you can only speculate and idk how much more this podcast can uncover. adnan knows that the state's case is wrong, and frustrated that it makes him out to be more callous and cold and is just incorrect, but can't throw jay in for it as the only way he knows totally that jay's clearly lying is because he did it with him. jay's testimony is all over the shop as he and jenn have edited it to reduce his involvement and lucked out with the police departments desire to get a conviction for adnan.
the thing is that doesn't really gell is that he could correct the record without protesting his innocence. but maybe, he is a smart guy, protesting his innocence is the only way to get the coverage that means his involvement can be reduced in public. or that it would just kill his family to admit guilt. or just that you need some hope on life sentence of escaping on a mis-trial because of jay's evidence and the sketchy 22 minute window presented to get through the day. or maybe he actually is innocent.
WooooorrrdWait so, about that Neisha call: She remembers Adnan calling her and putting Jay on the phone, but the prosecutor stopped her from revealing that they were at the porn store Jay worked at, meaning the call didn't happen until weeks after the murder (this is some Edgeworth level BS btw).
So after this guy made him help bury a body Jay is still inviting Adnan over to his work place and chilling with him. You'd think he'd want to spend as little time around him as possible.
And another thing, why did Adnan put Jay on the phone anyway? Maybe I'm just out of touch but why would someone put their friend (sorry, I mean "casual acquaintance") on the phone with some girl they're seeing casually? That seems off to me.
I still have no idea what's going on but I'm starting to lean to Adnan and Jay doing it together for some reason.
Finished episode five on the way to work this morning, going to listen to episode six on the way home.
So far I think Adnan is guilty. The case is mired in confusion and contradiction and it's certainly not clear cut, but I can't see a way in which anyone but Adnan did it. He's very convincing to listen to but I haven't heard a single thing to even slightly prove his innocence, while there's a bunch of things, admittedly weak, circumstantial or slightly off, that suggest he did it. Ok, there's the girl at the library, but she seems to be the only person in the world who remembers this encounter. Not even Adnan does, which is very strange.
One thing that stands out to me is how much information and evidence was overlooked or misinterpreted. Whichever way it would have leant in the case there seems to be so much that wasn't fully explored. Why didn't detectives investigate the route from episode five? The Best Buy phone. If Jay's evidence was the prosecution's key to the case, why did the jury believe a pot-smoking guy who changed his story half a dozen times? Surely that discredits him completely, even if the truth seeps out occasionally.
Again, we need to hear episode seven. Six was sort of intended to make you against Adnan.Completely caught up now, having finished episode six. Adnan looks more guilty than ever. I just can't see a way in which he isn't guilty. Proof he did it is thin on the ground, but proof otherwise is non-existent.
Yeah that's stuck in my mind as well. Especially when she questioned him about it and he says he kept in contact with close friends, kind of avoiding answering the question it sounded really bad for his case to me.I can't get over him not calling her once he learned she was missing. Even though he called her like 3 times the night before.
That is just bizzare.
Jay is one of the sketchiest dudes I've ever heard of. He has to have taken part in it in some way, it's ridiculous. I want her to speak with Jay directly.Wait so, about that Neisha call: She remembers Adnan calling her and putting Jay on the phone, but the prosecutor stopped her from revealing that they were at the porn store Jay worked at, meaning the call didn't happen until weeks after the murder (this is some Edgeworth level BS btw).
So after this guy made him help bury a body Jay is still inviting Adnan over to his work place and chilling with him. You'd think he'd want to spend as little time around him as possible.
And another thing, why did Adnan put Jay on the phone anyway? Maybe I'm just out of touch but why would someone put their friend (sorry, I mean "casual acquaintance") on the phone with some girl they're seeing casually? That seems off to me.
I still have no idea what's going on but I'm starting to lean to Adnan and Jay doing it together for some reason.
I really hope we get an episode that goes more in depth on this as well. All I remember is her saying that the report stated it had to happen within that amount of time, but with how mishandled so much of the evidence has been I want that to be investigated.I want to be on Adnan's side. My wife's family lives in the discussed area. My wife's cousins knew adnan's family growing up. Have been over. Feel horrible for what his family has gone through and lives through still. His mother and father especially. I feel life through my in laws I know them. Very typical Pakistani family.
I'm hooked. I want to believe him.
But two questions nag me which go against Adnan:
1. We learn him and Hae are still in touch and friendly. She calls him when she has an accident. He and his friends also insist he was a playa, party animal, who had 2-3 girls he was talking too or seeing at once. So if he isn't depressed and furious with her, why would he not once page her or call her after its confirmed she is missing?
Her friends all call and try. Adnan says be was in constant touch with the friends an getting information first hand. But not one call?
I get not calling when the cops called cause he might be thinking she is just out with her boyfriend and will be in trouble with her parents. But he called her 3 times the night before and never again. Doesn't add up.
2. The Nisha call. If he is at school at track practice, who calls Nisha? Jay? Why would he? Wouldn't she remember speaking only to Jay?
One thing that does go in his favor in my mind is I just don't imagine him and Jay (if they were in this together) killing her in broad day light and then instead of being in a rush to bury her, drive around town randomly hitting up friends houses and smoking pot. Wouldn't anyone try to hide or get rid of the evidence ?
They so casually spend the evening taking huge risks at every turn, especially Adnan since it was Ramadan.
And how do we know she was killed that day at all? Is the coroner's report or autopsy revealing anything that says she was killed that day that tike for sure? Is that all on what Jay says?
Personally right now I do think Adnan was involved somehow but it might be drug related (the 3rd party) and he is far more afraid of retaliation (to his fam?). You'd think he would be screaming and crying with his own theories and proofs
All he does is poke holes. Almost like he wants to be freed but only if he gets off on incompetent police work and prosecution.
I think the thing that gets me the most is that Adnan said Jay and him weren't really friends. So why would he call Jay to partake in what he said?
Once police have a suspect they think is guilty, they stop investigating the case and looking for new leads. Literally happens all the time.
Certainly tried as an adult.How old was Adnan when he got charged murder? Wasn't he too young to be charged for life?
I appreciated that all the students were saying that there was way too little evidence to convict. The most exciting part of the episode was the teaser for the next one though.Anyone listen to episode 7 yet? Not much in terms of new evidence, but SK has an entire superteam of people investigating with her now. This is pretty exciting.
The deal with Jay is going to be a pivotal episode. There is so much shady shit with Jay it's unbelievable.
To me, Jay was definitely directly involved in the killing itself. And if he was, I think that likely means Adnan was as well... but the evidence is not yet enough to convict.
I'm not wild about them bringing in this team of investigators. The series was already lacking a narrative voice from the prosecution side. Now, in addition to Adnan himself and Sarah struggling to remain neutral, there is a whole team of people operating from the assumption that he is innocent and trying to prove it.
I'm not wild about them bringing in this team of investigators. The series was already lacking a narrative voice from the prosecution side. Now, in addition to Adnan himself and Sarah struggling to remain neutral, there is a whole team of people operating from the assumption that he is innocent and trying to prove it.
Listening now. Its crazy how excited I am each new episode.Anyone listen to episode 7 yet? Not much in terms of new evidence, but SK has an entire superteam of people investigating with her now. This is pretty exciting.
I'm not wild about them bringing in this team of investigators. The series was already lacking a narrative voice from the prosecution side. Now, in addition to Adnan himself and Sarah struggling to remain neutral, there is a whole team of people operating from the assumption that he is innocent and trying to prove it.
What are you even talking about? Why should they operate from any other assumption?
Innocent until proven guilty is supposed to be the default.
My least favorite part of this episode was when the ending theme music started.
I am talking about the narrative that is presented on the podcast.
We already have Adnan saying "I am innocent."
We have Sarah who is trying to stay neutral, but who wants to think Adnan is innocent because he is a nice guy.
The narrative from the prosecution has been missing in this series. We don't have interviews with Jay. We don't have interviews with the investigators. We don't have interviews with the prosecution's lawyers.
Now we are going to have another group with a goal of proving Adnan is innocent. I am concerned that this will impact the narrative balance of the show to its detriment.
That is the standard for a legal trial of someone who has not been found guilty.
This is not a trial. There already was a trial, and Adnan was found guilty. "Innocent until proven guilty" is no longer relevant. Moreover, if this were a trial, we would have a voice from both the prosecution and the defense.
Finished episode five on the way to work this morning, going to listen to episode six on the way home.
So far I think Adnan is guilty. The case is mired in confusion and contradiction and it's certainly not clear cut, but I can't see a way in which anyone but Adnan did it. He's very convincing to listen to but I haven't heard a single thing to even slightly prove his innocence, while there's a bunch of things, admittedly weak, circumstantial or slightly off, that suggest he did it. Ok, there's the girl at the library, but she seems to be the only person in the world who remembers this encounter. Not even Adnan does, which is very strange.
One thing that stands out to me is how much information and evidence was overlooked or misinterpreted. Whichever way it would have leant in the case there seems to be so much that wasn't fully explored. Why didn't detectives investigate the route from episode five? The Best Buy phone. If Jay's evidence was the prosecution's key to the case, why did the jury believe a pot-smoking guy who changed his story half a dozen times? Surely that discredits him completely, even if the truth seeps out occasionally.
The fact that he was already convicted and has spent years in prison where every interview is conducted isn't enough of a counter balance? And they just did an episode whose stated mission at the top was to "lay out the entire case against Adnan."
I'm not sure what you want from them. Why would Jay or members of the prosecution grant an interview? They have absolutely no incentive to do that. She already said that she tried to interview the detectives and both were uninterested.
Too many strange things. The whole never trying to call after she went missing is a giant red flag for me. It tells me that he knew she was gone.
I wonder if she can track Jay down...
"That's a scanner scanning its little scanner heart out."
Hehe lovely.
Well, he did know she was gone. Everyone knew she was gone. This isn't evidence.
OP updated.
After episode seven, how are you leaning on Adnan's guilt?
This podcast is literally a stop everything else and listen.
I thought Deidre was largely full of shit. Her opinions on determining who tells the truth vs who doesn't, the number of charming sociopaths in the wild, and other aspects of the case held no weight with me. I'm only interested in her team's investigation of the forensic evidence: does it still exist? Can it be analyzed further? Might we find DNA linking the crime to a known criminal, Jay, or Adnan?
Sarah nervously asking Deirdre questions followed by Deidre manically answering using wild speculations (she wasn't completely familiar with the case at this point) were a waste of about 15 minutes.
I thought Deidre was largely full of shit. Her opinions on determining who tells the truth vs who doesn't, the number of charming sociopaths in the wild, and other aspects of the case held no weight with me. I'm only interested in her team's investigation of the forensic evidence: does it still exist? Can it be analyzed further? Might we find DNA linking the crime to a known criminal, Jay, or Adnan?
Sarah nervously asking Deirdre questions followed by Deidre manically answering using wild speculations (she wasn't completely familiar with the case at this point) were a waste of about 15 minutes.
Which things?I tend to believe her word and the words of some of her students since:
1. She's been doing this sort of work for decades
2. She teaches law and
3. Her students are studying law
The things Sarah missed or downplayed in previous episodes are highlighted here because she isn't familiar with the nitty gritty bits of doing investigative work for an actual law case and what threads should be followed or not. She's a great investigative journalist, but she's not a lawyer.