His use of "She's real" because she doesn't fit modern standards basically says any woman that does fit modern beauty standards is by default, "not real".
Also using your wife's body as a teachable moment to get internet fame points is kind of shitty all the way down. Also also expected cookies because you find your wife sexy? Well, good on you, bro. I'm glad your sex life is okay? Congrats?
That's often a descriptor used by feminists when describing photoshopped magazine covers.
1. Heavily photoshopped magazine covers are technically
not "real" and contribute to issues. 2. Non-body-pos feminists who talk this way about actual non-photoshopped humans might need to revisit some reading lists.
Of course there are.
My point is should they stay confined and inaccessible to other colours (on a superficial level, let's I say) because they can't fully understand ?
I can't laugh at Eddie Murphy's jokes because I probably will never completely appreciate them ?
Well, this is certainly true, and I understand where this is coming from, I am just not sure this is the right way to approach the issue.
Let me get this straight:
You, apparently non-black person from the content of your post, has decided that it is your place to tell black woman who wrote article that her suggestion people think about the implications of using gifs that rely on black people being "extra" is not the right way to approach this issue you don't have a personal stake in?
The twitter user posted was laughing and retweeting a person saying they hoped he catches a disease for that post and right before that was retweeting people talking about Cyber Bullying being bad.
This kind of backhanded nonsense among "feminists" is so widespread I have a conference presentation on it in early October. It was particularly egregious around the women's march and is a huge problem. Same kinda deal with all the people who swear there's "not a racist bone in their body" and then do all sorts of racist shit.
